Literature DB >> 33484584

Freshwater zooplankton microbiome composition is highly flexible and strongly influenced by the environment.

Ester M Eckert1, Nikoleta Anicic1,2, Diego Fontaneto1.   

Abstract

The association with microbes in plants and animals is known to be beneficial for host's survival and fitness, but the generality of the effect of the microbiome is still debated. For some animals, similarities in microbiome composition reflect taxonomic relatedness of the hosts, a pattern termed phylosymbiosis. The mechanisms behind the pattern could be due to co-evolution and/or to correlated ecological constraints. General conclusions are hampered by the fact that available knowledge is highly dominated by microbiomes from model species. Here, we addressed the issue of the generality of phylosymbiosis by analysing the species-specificity of microbiomes across different species of freshwater zooplankton, including rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods, coupling field surveys and experimental manipulations. We found that no signal of phylosymbiosis was present, and that the proportion of "core" microbial taxa, stable and consistent within each species, was very low. Changes in food and temperature under laboratory experimental settings revealed that the microbiome of freshwater zooplankton is highly flexible and can be influenced by the external environment. Thus, the role of co-evolution, strict association, and interaction with microbes within the holobiont concept highlighted for vertebrates, corals, sponges, and other animals does not seem to be supported for all animals, at least not for freshwater zooplankton. Zooplankton floats in the environment where both food and bacteria that can provide help in digesting such food are available. In addition, there is probably redundancy for beneficial bacterial functions in the environment, not allowing a strict host-microbiome association to originate and persist.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacteria; crustaceans; host parasite interactions; phylosymbiosis; rotifers; species interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33484584     DOI: 10.1111/mec.15815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  5 in total

1.  Host-Associated Bacterial Communities Vary Between Daphnia galeata Genotypes but Not by Host Genetic Distance.

Authors:  Amruta Rajarajan; Justyna Wolinska; Jean-Claude Walser; Stuart R Dennis; Piet Spaak
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Microbiomes of microscopic marine invertebrates do not reveal signatures of phylosymbiosis.

Authors:  V Boscaro; C C Holt; N W L Van Steenkiste; M Herranz; N A T Irwin; P Àlvarez-Campos; K Grzelak; O Holovachov; A Kerbl; V Mathur; N Okamoto; R S Piercey; K Worsaae; B S Leander; P J Keeling
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 30.964

3.  Population Differences and Host Species Predict Variation in the Diversity of Host-Associated Microbes in Hydra.

Authors:  Jan Taubenheim; Máté Miklós; Jácint Tökölyi; Sebastian Fraune
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Zooplankton as a Transitional Host for Escherichia coli in Freshwater.

Authors:  Andrea Di Cesare; Francesco Riva; Noemi Colinas; Giulia Borgomaneiro; Sara Borin; Pedro J Cabello-Yeves; Claudia Canale; Nicholas Cedraro; Barbara Citterio; Elena Crotti; Gianmarco Mangiaterra; Francesca Mapelli; Vincenzo Mondino; Carla Vignaroli; Walter Quaranta; Gianluca Corno; Diego Fontaneto; Ester M Eckert
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.005

5.  Daily feeding rhythm linked to microbiome composition in two zooplankton species.

Authors:  Alaina Pfenning-Butterworth; Reilly O Cooper; Clayton E Cressler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.