Literature DB >> 33484314

Distal biceps tendon repairs and reconstructions-an analysis of demographics, prodromal symptoms and complications.

Toni Luokkala1,2, Sijin K Sidharthan3, Teemu V Karjalainen4, Juha Paloneva4,5, Adam C Watts3,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographics, complications and prodromal symptoms (any pain or unpleasant sensation in the area distal biceps tendon preceding the injury) of distal biceps tendon tears (DBTTs) of patients treated with primary repair or Achilles allograft reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 228 consecutive DBTTs in 226 patients from a single centre were evaluated. The demographic data, prodromal symptoms and postoperative adverse events were documented.
RESULTS: There were 225 males and 1 female patient. The age distribution showed a bimodal pattern in the whole cohort, but once the 48 (20%) elite athletes were excluded, the age was normally distributed, peaking in the 5th decade. Direct repairs were performed in 184 cases and reconstruction with Achilles tendon allograft in 45 cases. An adverse event was observed in 34 (19%) patients who underwent direct repair and in 3 (7%) cases with graft reconstruction, corresponding to RR of 0.32 (95% CI 0.1-0.96, p = 0.04). Adjusting with the potential confounders (age, occupation and smoking), the OR was 0.35; 95% CI 0.09-1.3, p = 0.11). Adverse events included 28 (12.3% of all adverse events) lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN) neurapraxias, 5 (2.1%) other neurapraxias, 6 (2.6%) heterotopic ossifications and 1 (0.4%) re-rupture. Twenty-three (10%) patients reported prodromal symptoms before the tear.
CONCLUSIONS: DBTT is a condition that affects men predominantly. The observed bimodal incidence distribution was related to elite athletes, but in the normal population the peak occurs at the age typical to tendinopathies. LABCN neurapraxia was the most common adverse event, and graft use does not seem to predispose to adverse events.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biceps; Complication; Reconstruction; Repair; Tendinopathy; Tendon

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33484314     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03750-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  19 in total

1.  Distal biceps tendon reconstruction in chronic ruptures.

Authors:  Nickolaos A Darlis; Dean G Sotereanos
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures: An Epidemiological Analysis Using a Large Population Database.

Authors:  Mick P Kelly; Scott G Perkinson; Robert H Ablove; Jonathan L Tueting
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  A comparison of nonoperative vs. Endobutton repair of distal biceps ruptures.

Authors:  Andrew J Legg; Richard Stevens; Nanette O Oakes; Shantanu A Shahane
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Major complications after distal biceps tendon repairs: retrospective cohort analysis of 970 cases.

Authors:  Samuel E Ford; Jason S Andersen; David M Macknet; Patrick M Connor; Bryan J Loeffler; R Glenn Gaston
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 5.  Distal biceps tendon injuries.

Authors:  Ryan G Miyamoto; Florian Elser; Peter J Millett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Trends associated with distal biceps tendon repair in the United States, 2007 to 2011.

Authors:  Dean Wang; Nirav B Joshi; Frank A Petrigliano; Jeremiah R Cohen; Elizabeth L Lord; Jeffrey C Wang; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Primary repair of retracted distal biceps tendon ruptures in extreme flexion.

Authors:  Mark E Morrey; Matthew P Abdel; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon: conservative treatment versus anatomic reinsertion--clinical and radiological evaluation after 2 years.

Authors:  Claudio Chillemi; Mario Marinelli; Vincenzo De Cupis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group.

Authors:  Carl R Freeman; Kelly R McCormick; Donna Mahoney; Mark Baratz; John D Lubahn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Clinical and functional impairment after nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures.

Authors:  Christopher C Schmidt; Brandon T Brown; Daniel L Schmidt; Michael P Smolinski; Thomas Kotsonis; Kenneth J Faber; Kraig S Graham; Tyler J Madonna; Patrick J Smolinski; Mark Carl Miller
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  1 in total

1.  Distal biceps rupture: Evaluation and management.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Krishna Soni
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.