Literature DB >> 30139681

Major complications after distal biceps tendon repairs: retrospective cohort analysis of 970 cases.

Samuel E Ford1, Jason S Andersen2, David M Macknet1, Patrick M Connor2, Bryan J Loeffler3, R Glenn Gaston4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The major complication and reoperation rates after distal biceps repair are poorly defined. The purpose of this large retrospective cohort study of distal biceps repairs performed by multiple surgeons within a large orthopedic group was to more clearly define the rates and risk factors of clinically impactful major complications and reoperations.
METHODS: All distal biceps tendon repairs performed from January 2005 through April 2017 with a minimum 2-month follow-up were identified using Current Procedural Terminology code 24342. We included 970 patients. The primary outcome measure was the total major complication rate. Reoperations, minor complications, and risk factors were also tracked.
RESULTS: Repairs were performed via a single anterior incision in 652 cases and a 2-incision exposure in 318 cases. A 7.5% major complication rate and 4.5% reoperation rate were observed overall. Major complications occurred at the following rates: proximal radioulnar synostosis, 1.0%; heterotopic ossification or loss of range of motion with reoperation, 0.9%; tendon rerupture, 1.6%; deep infection, 0.5%; posterior interosseous nerve palsy, 1.9%; and complex regional pain syndrome, 0.6%. The 2-incision exposure was identified as a significant risk factor for the development of proximal radioulnar synostosis when compared with single-incision repair techniques (P = .0003; odds ratio, 19), occurring in 2.8% of 2-incision exposure cases. Lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve neuritis or numbness and radial sensory nerve neuritis or numbness were documented more frequently in the postoperative period among patients treated with a single-incision exposure (P < .0001 and P = .034, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Distal biceps repair is associated with a 7.5% major complication rate and 4.5% reoperation rate. The use of a 2-incision technique for repair increases the risk of radioulnar synostosis.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal biceps; complications; heterotopic ossification; proximal radioulnar synostosis; reoperation; rerupture; single incision; two-incision exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30139681     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  13 in total

1.  Distal Biceps Repairs in Females: A Large Single-Center Case Series.

Authors:  Allison J Rao; Gregory T Scarola; Taylor M Rowe; Nicholas C Yeatts; David M Macknet; Samuel E Ford; Ian S Hong; R Glenn Gaston; Bryan M Saltzman; Nady Hamid; Patrick M Connor
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-04-27

2.  Acute distal biceps tendon rupture: retrospective analysis of two different approaches and fixation techniques.

Authors:  Marco Di Stefano; Lorenzo Sensi; Leonardo di Bella; Raffaele Tucci; Efisio Bazzucchi; Luigi Zanna
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Modified Double-Incision Technique: Patient-Reported Outcomes With 10-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Sam Razaeian; Dafang Zhang; Afif Harb; Rupert Meller; Christian Krettek; Nael Hawi
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-20

4.  Distal biceps tendon repairs and reconstructions-an analysis of demographics, prodromal symptoms and complications.

Authors:  Toni Luokkala; Sijin K Sidharthan; Teemu V Karjalainen; Juha Paloneva; Adam C Watts
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Evidence-based Risk Stratification for Sport Medicine Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Betina B Hinckel; Charles A Baumann; Leandro Ejnisman; Leonardo M Cavinatto; Alexander Martusiewicz; Miho J Tanaka; Marc Tompkins; Seth L Sherman; Jorge A Chahla; Rachel Frank; Guilherme L Yamamoto; James Bicos; Liza Arendt; Donald Fithian; Jack Farr
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-10-01

Review 6.  Surgical outcomes and complications following distal biceps tendon reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Madison L Litowski; Jennifer Purnell; Kevin A Hildebrand; Aaron J Bois
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-10-31

7.  Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture Videos on YouTube: An Analysis of Video Content and Quality.

Authors:  Brian K Foster; William Mack Malarkey; Timothy C Maurer; Daniela F Barreto Rocha; Idorenyin F Udoeyo; Louis C Grandizio
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2021-12-01

8.  Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Ruptures in a Consecutive Case Series.

Authors:  Daniel P Berthold; Lukas N Muench; Antonio Cusano; Colin L Uyeki; Maria Slater; Lisa M Tamburini; Stephanie Geyer; Mark P Cote; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-09

9.  Clinical Outcomes After Revision Distal Biceps Tendon Surgery.

Authors:  Gagan Grewal; Eamon D Bernardoni; Mark S Cohen; John J Fernandez; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-29

10.  CLINICAL RESULT OF PATIENTS WITH DISTAL BICEPS TENDON RUPTURE WITH ENDOBUTTON.

Authors:  Jonatas Brito DE Alencar; Diego Frade Bernardes; Clodoaldo José Duarte DE Souza; Marcos Antônio Silva Girão; Pedro Henrique Messias DA Rocha; Fernando Antônio Mendes Façanha
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.