Literature DB >> 33483787

2020 international practice patterns in adult joint reconstruction surgery: a survey of members of the International Society of Orthopaedic Centers.

Daniel C Santana1, Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle2, Alison K Klika1, Briana Bloom2, Mathias Bostrom2, Nicolas S Piuzzi3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is important to assess global trends in the practice of adult reconstruction orthopaedic surgery to understand how new evidence is being implemented. The International Society of Orthopaedic Centers (ISOC) is a consortium of academic orthopaedic centers whose members' practices likely reflect contemporary evidence and indicate how orthopaedic surgery residents and fellows are trained.
METHODS: We administered a 65 question, electronic survey of adult reconstruction surgeons across the ISOC centers in September 2020 to assess practice patterns. Results were assessed using descriptive statistics or by modeling the underlying response distribution, and the analysis was stratified by hospital region.
RESULTS: 79 surgeons across 19 ISOC centers in 5 continents (Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, South America) completed the survey. Selected findings include: in total hip arthroplasty (THA), the posterolateral approach was used for 71 ± 42% of THA (mean ± standard deviation) and the direct anterior approach in 18% ± 34%. In total knee arthroplasty, posterior-stabilized (66% ± 39%) and cruciate-retaining (19  ± 33%) implants were most common. Robots were available in 56% (44 of 79) of surgeons' centers more commonly in Asia, Australia, and North America. Tranexamic acid was routinely used in arthroplasty by 99% (78 of 79) of surgeons. Eighty-six percent (68 of 79) submit data to joint or other registries. Virtual visits were used for 13% ± 16% of outpatient visits and by 82% (64 of 79) of surgeons overall.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings may be of use now for surgeons to consider the practices of their peers at high-volume academic institutions, and in the future as we track temporal trends.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Implant selection; Practice survey; Surgical approach; Virtual visit

Year:  2021        PMID: 33483787     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02876-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  7 in total

Review 1.  Arthroplasty registries around the world: valuable sources of hip implant revision risk data.

Authors:  Richard E Hughes; Aditi Batra; Brian R Hallstrom
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Outcomes of Posterior-Stabilized Compared with Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mauro Ciuffreda; Nicholas Mannering; Valerio D'Andrea; Joel Locher; Giuseppe Salvatore; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Variability in anesthetic care for total knee arthroplasty: an analysis from the anesthesia quality institute.

Authors:  Peter M Fleischut; Jonathan M Eskreis-Winkler; Licia K Gaber-Baylis; Gregory P Giambrone; Susan L Faggiani; Richard P Dutton; Stavros G Memtsoudis
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Practice Management Strategies Among Current Members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons.

Authors:  Jay R Lieberman; James A Browne; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Evidence-Based Orthopedic Surgery-From Synthesis to Practice.

Authors:  Ahmed K Emara; Alison K Klika; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide.

Authors:  Ofir Chechik; Morsi Khashan; Ran Lador; Moshe Salai; Eyal Amar
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The effect of fixation type on the survivorship of contemporary total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years of age: a register-based study of 115,177 knees in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 2000-2016.

Authors:  Mika J Niemeläinen; Keijo T Mäkelä; Otto Robertsson; Annette W-Dahl; Ove Furnes; Anne M Fenstad; Alma B Pedersen; Henrik M Schrøder; Aleksi Reito; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Development and Service Evaluation of an ad hoc Virtual Arthroplasty Clinic during COVID-19: Experiences from Irish National Orthopaedic Hospital.

Authors:  B Murphy; P Carroll; R Daly; A McLaverty; P Keogh; J O'Byrne; J Cashman
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2022-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.