Literature DB >> 28666292

Outcomes of Posterior-Stabilized Compared with Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Umile Giuseppe Longo1, Mauro Ciuffreda1, Nicholas Mannering2, Valerio D'Andrea1, Joel Locher1, Giuseppe Salvatore1, Vincenzo Denaro1.   

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to compare clinical outcome scores, rate of complications, and range of motion (ROM) of posterior-stabilized (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) both pre- and postoperatively to establish which of the two kinds of implants have the best efficiency. A comprehensive search was performed of studies comparing CR and PS TKAs on PubMed, OVID/Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, Google scholar, and Embase databases. Finally, 37 studies were selected with a total of 5,407 knees in 4,445 patients. For the PS knees, the Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS) improved from 44.6 to 77.6 (p = 0.04), extension decreased from 6.6 to 1.8 degrees (p-value), and flexion increased from 115.2 to 119.4 degrees (p < 0.00001), compared with the CR knees. No significant difference in the Knee Society objective score (KSOS) (p = 0.82) or complication rates (p = 0.29) was found. The overall complication rate was 3.9%, 213 in 5,407 knees. Surgeons must be careful in interpreting these results, as an improved ROM for the PS group may not correlate to better patient outcomes. This meta-analysis has demonstrated that PS TKA has a statistically significant greater postoperative improvement of KSFS (p = 0.04), flexion (p < 0.00001), and extension (p = 0.02), compared with the CR group. These findings seem to lead the surgeons to prefer the PS design for TKAs especially to achieve a higher postoperative ROM in patients with high functional demands. On the contrary, the CR and PS TKAs have similar results in terms of complications and most of clinical outcomes analyzed in the included studies. Therefore, the long-term follow-up of high-quality randomized controlled trials is needed to clarify which of the two types of prosthesis provide the better clinical outcome and the lower rate of complications for osteoarthritis patients in particular cohorts. This is a systematic review (level II). Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28666292     DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  17 in total

1.  Midflexion instability in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Vincenzo Candela; Francesco Pirato; Michael T Hirschmann; Roland Becker; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Metaphyseal cones and sleeves are similar in improving short- and mid-term outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Giovanni Intermesoli; Francesco Pirato; Ilaria Piergentili; Roland Becker; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Fixed Tibial Inserts: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  John Krumme; Roma Kankaria; Madana Vallem; John Cyrus; Peter Sculco; Gregory Golladay; Niraj Kalore
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Octogenarians Are the New Sexagenarians: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Inferior to Posterior-Stabilized Arthroplasty in Octogenarian Patients.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Prem Haridas Menon; Abhijeet Salunke; Ilaria Mariani; Giovanni Palminteri; Giuseppe Basile; Nicola Ursino; Laura Mangiavini; Michael Hantes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  No difference in PROMs between robotic-assisted CR versus PS total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jarod A Richards; Mark D Williams; Neil A Gupta; Joseph M Kitchen; John E Whitaker; Langan S Smith; Arthur L Malkani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-08

Review 6.  Comparison of Functional Outcomes, Femoral Rollback and Sagittal Stability of Anterior-Stabilized Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Balgovind S Raja; Aditya K S Gowda; Sajid Ansari; Arghya Kundu Choudhury; Roop Bhushan Kalia
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 1.033

7.  A short-term radiological and clinical comparison between the bi-cruciate and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty A retrospective case controlled study.

Authors:  S Kalaai; Y F L Bemelmans; M Scholtes; B Boonen; E H van Haaren; M G M Schotanus
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-26

8.  Kinematics of bicruciate stabilized and cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Teruya Ishibashi; Takaharu Yamazaki; Shoji Konda; Masashi Tamaki; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Tetsuya Tomita
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.102

9.  Increased Intercondylar Femoral Box Cut-to-Femur Size Ratio During Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases Risk for Intraoperative Fracture.

Authors:  William F Sherman; Ashton Mansour; Fernando L Sanchez; Victor J Wu
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-05-11

10.  Comparison of Patient Satisfaction Between Medial Pivot Prostheses and Posterior-Stabilized Prostheses in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Lin; Xueyan Chen; Li Li; Zhenxing Li; Yu Zhang; Pei Fan
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.