Literature DB >> 33483631

Skeletal muscle depletion and nutrition support affected postoperative complications in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy.

Kaipeng Duan1, Xin Gao1, Luxin Wei1, Mengting Gong2, Bin Feng3, Jin Zhou4, Dongming Zhu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Body composition has been shown closely related to the outcome in surgical patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether preoperative skeletal muscle condition and postoperative nutrition would affect major complications in patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
METHODS: This retrospective study included 265 patients underwent PD. Body composition data was extracted from the L3 level of the preoperative CT scan. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to investigate correlations between body composition data and postoperative complications. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between postoperative nutrition strategy and the outcome.
RESULTS: Of all the 265 patients, major complications occurred in 81 patients (30.6%). Cutoff values for skeletal muscle depletion were defined by ROC curve analysis from postoperative complications in skeletal muscle index (SMI) (male 47.32 cm2/m2 and female 40.65 cm2/m2). Univariable analysis and multivariable regression revealed age (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.22-1.83, p = 0.026), SMI (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51-0.94, p = 0.015) and skeletal muscle density (SMD) (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64-1.03, p = 0.029) were independent predictors for major complications. Subgroup analysis showed the initial parenteral nutrition time (IPNT) (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.43-2.49, p = 0.032) and average protein delivery (APD) (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-0.89, p = 0.021) were significantly associated with major complications in patients with lower SMI.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative skeletal muscle index and density were independently associated with major complications in patients underwent PD. In patients with lower SMI, early parenteral nutrition and higher protein delivery were related to better outcome.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33483631     DOI: 10.1038/s41430-020-00851-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.884


  46 in total

Review 1.  Body Composition in Asians and Caucasians: Comparative Analyses and Influences on Cardiometabolic Outcomes.

Authors:  Sumanto Haldar; Siok Ching Chia; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry
Journal:  Adv Food Nutr Res       Date:  2015-08-12

2.  Predictive value of sarcopenia and visceral obesity for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy analyzed on clinically acquired CT and MRI.

Authors:  Minji Jang; Hyung Woo Park; Jimi Huh; Jong Hwa Lee; Yoong Ki Jeong; Yang Won Nah; Jisuk Park; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Anthropometric Changes in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Preoperative Therapy and Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Graciela M Nogueras-González; Laura R Prakash; Maria Q B Petzel; Nathan H Parker; An T Ngo-Huang; David Fogelman; Jason W Denbo; Naveen Garg; Michael P Kim; Jeffrey E Lee; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Jason B Fleming; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery.

Authors:  Arved Weimann; Marco Braga; Franco Carli; Takashi Higashiguchi; Martin Hübner; Stanislaw Klek; Alessandro Laviano; Olle Ljungqvist; Dileep N Lobo; Robert Martindale; Dan L Waitzberg; Stephan C Bischoff; Pierre Singer
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Cancer cachexia in the age of obesity: skeletal muscle depletion is a powerful prognostic factor, independent of body mass index.

Authors:  Lisa Martin; Laura Birdsell; Neil Macdonald; Tony Reiman; M Thomas Clandinin; Linda J McCargar; Rachel Murphy; Sunita Ghosh; Michael B Sawyer; Vickie E Baracos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Low skeletal muscle radiation attenuation and visceral adiposity are associated with overall survival and surgical site infections in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  David P J van Dijk; Maikel J A M Bakens; Mariëlle M E Coolsen; Sander S Rensen; Ronald M van Dam; Martijn J L Bours; Matty P Weijenberg; Cornelis H C Dejong; Steven W M Olde Damink
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 12.910

7.  Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis.

Authors:  Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Gülistan Bahat; Jürgen Bauer; Yves Boirie; Olivier Bruyère; Tommy Cederholm; Cyrus Cooper; Francesco Landi; Yves Rolland; Avan Aihie Sayer; Stéphane M Schneider; Cornel C Sieber; Eva Topinkova; Maurits Vandewoude; Marjolein Visser; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 10.668

8.  Power of computed-tomography-defined sarcopenia for prediction of morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Nicolas Linder; Alexander Schaudinn; Katharina Langenhan; Felix Krenzien; Hans-Michael Hau; Christian Benzing; Georgi Atanasov; Moritz Schmelzle; Thomas Kahn; Harald Busse; Michael Bartels; Ulf Neumann; Georg Wiltberger
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  The Preoperative CT-Scan Can Help to Predict Postoperative Complications after Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Femke F Schröder; Feike de Graaff; Donald E Bouman; Marjolein Brusse-Keizer; Kees H Slump; Joost M Klaase
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity are independent adverse prognostic factors in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Elisabeth S Gruber; Gerd Jomrich; Dietmar Tamandl; Michael Gnant; Martin Schindl; Klaus Sahora
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.