Mustapha Bouhrara1, Nikkita Khattar2, Palchamy Elango3, Susan M Resnick4, Luigi Ferrucci3, Richard G Spencer2. 1. Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. bouhraram@mail.nih.gov. 2. Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. 3. Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. 4. Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myelin loss is a central feature of several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). In animal studies, a link has been established between obesity and impairment of oligodendrocyte maturation, the cells that produce and maintain myelin. Although clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have revealed microstructural alterations of cerebral white matter tissue in subjects with obesity, no specific myelin vs. obesity correlation studies have been performed in humans using a direct myelin content metric. OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between obesity and myelin integrity in cerebral white matter using advanced MRI methodology for myelin content imaging. METHODS: Studies were performed in the clinical unit of the National Institute on Aging on a cohort of 119 cognitively unimpaired adults. Using advanced MRI methodology, we measured whole-brain myelin water fraction (MWF), a marker of myelin content. Automated brain mapping algorithms and statistical models were used to evaluate the relationships between MWF and obesity, measured using the body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC), in various white matter brain regions. RESULTS: MWF was negatively associated with BMI or WC in all brain regions evaluated. These associations, adjusted for sex, ethnicity, and age, were statistically significant in most brain regions examined (p < 0.05), with higher BMI or WC corresponding to lower myelin content. Finally, in agreement with previous work, MWF exhibited a quadratic, inverted U-shaped, association with age; this is attributed to the process of myelination from youth through middle age, followed by demyelination afterward. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that obesity was significantly associated with white matter integrity, and in particular myelin content. We expect that this work will lay the foundation for further investigations to clarify the nature of myelin damage in neurodegeneration, including AD, and the effect of lifestyle factors such as diet and physical activity on myelination.
BACKGROUND: Myelin loss is a central feature of several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). In animal studies, a link has been established between obesity and impairment of oligodendrocyte maturation, the cells that produce and maintain myelin. Although clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have revealed microstructural alterations of cerebral white matter tissue in subjects with obesity, no specific myelin vs. obesity correlation studies have been performed in humans using a direct myelin content metric. OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between obesity and myelin integrity in cerebral white matter using advanced MRI methodology for myelin content imaging. METHODS: Studies were performed in the clinical unit of the National Institute on Aging on a cohort of 119 cognitively unimpaired adults. Using advanced MRI methodology, we measured whole-brain myelin water fraction (MWF), a marker of myelin content. Automated brain mapping algorithms and statistical models were used to evaluate the relationships between MWF and obesity, measured using the body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC), in various white matter brain regions. RESULTS: MWF was negatively associated with BMI or WC in all brain regions evaluated. These associations, adjusted for sex, ethnicity, and age, were statistically significant in most brain regions examined (p < 0.05), with higher BMI or WC corresponding to lower myelin content. Finally, in agreement with previous work, MWF exhibited a quadratic, inverted U-shaped, association with age; this is attributed to the process of myelination from youth through middle age, followed by demyelination afterward. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that obesity was significantly associated with white matter integrity, and in particular myelin content. We expect that this work will lay the foundation for further investigations to clarify the nature of myelin damage in neurodegeneration, including AD, and the effect of lifestyle factors such as diet and physical activity on myelination.
People suffering from obesity are at higher risk for a myriad of diseases and
health conditions, including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, stroke, elevated
cholesterol, and sleep apnea. Furthermore, epidemiological evidence has established
a link between obesity and central nervous system (CNS) degeneration (1–3). This
may reflect neuronal and synaptic degeneration secondary to obesity-induced
metabolic disturbances; in turn, these may be contributors to the onset and
progression of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s and
Parkinson’s diseases (1, 4–7).
Moreover, growing evidence indicates that lifestyle factors such as diet and
physical activity improve brain structure and function, suggesting novel therapeutic
strategies against neurodegenerative disorders (8–10).Microstructural changes in the gray and white matter of the brain secondary
to obesity have been documented by conventional quantitative magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) (11–14). Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), magnetization
transfer (MT), MR relaxation time mapping, and morphometry, it has been shown that
body mass index (BMI) is negatively correlated with tissue integrity in several
brain structures (11–13, 15, 16). However, as recognized by these authors,
it is very difficult to interpret these findings in terms of underlying
histopathologic changes. Indeed, while sensitive to changes in brain tissue
microstructure, conventional MRI techniques are not specific; in addition to axonal
degeneration and demyelination, these parameters may also reflect other tissue
properties such as macromolecular content, flow, and fiber architecture. Similar
comments apply to the non-specificity of MR spectroscopy studies of the correlation
between obesity and myelination (17). Thus,
to the best of our knowledge, the specific association between obesity and
myelination remains to be established. Furthermore, these previous MRI
investigations were conducted on cohorts of limited size and limited age range, both
limiting the statistical power of the analysis and providing results that may not be
reflective of a wide adult age range.Several multicomponent MRI relaxometry methods have been introduced for
myelin content mapping through measurement of the myelin water fraction (MWF) (18), including BMC-mcDESPOT (19–21)
which provides rapid whole-brain MWF maps (19–22). BMC-mcDESPOT has
been extensively used in several MWF-based studies to provide quantitative evidence
of myelin loss in mild cognitive impairment and dementia (23), to investigate myelination patterns with normative
aging (24–26), and to demonstrate an association between myelin
content and cerebral blood flow (27).Production and maintenance of myelin through oligodendrocyte metabolism is
critical for saltatory conduction and normal axonal function. Growing evidence is
establishing a direct relationship between myelin loss and a number of functional
neurological disorders (18, 23, 28),
suggesting that the breakdown of the myelin sheath could represent an important
feature of early neurodegeneration, including mild cognitive impairment and
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (23, 29, 30).
This notion is further supported by animal studies showing that a high fat diet can
trigger myelin damage while obesity inhibits the maturation of the oligodendrocyte
cells (9, 31, 32).In this work, we examined the association between myelin content and obesity
in 119 cognitively unimpaired subjects with healthy weight, overweight, or obesity
spanning a wide age-range (22 to 94 years). Our main goal was to characterize the
association between regional MWF, as a measure of myelin content, and BMI and waist
circumference (WC), as measures of obesity, and to develop new insights into the
specific effect of obesity on regional myelin integrity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Participants
One hundred thirty-one participants were recruited from the Genetic and
Epigenetic Signatures of Translational Aging Laboratory Testing (GESTALT) study
and the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). Conducted by the National
Institute on Aging, the goal of these studies is to evaluate multiple aging
biomarkers. The criteria for exclusion and inclusion are identical for the
GESTALT and BLSA studies. Participants were excluded if they had significant
medical or neurologic conditions. Participants had undergone the Mini Mental
State Examination (MMSE). Nine participants with cognitive impairment and three
participants with MRI data corrupted by motion artifacts were excluded. The
final cohort therefore consisted of 119 cognitively unimpaired volunteers (mean
± standard deviation MMSE = 28.7 ± 1.5) ranging in age from 22 to
94 years (56.3 ± 20.9 years) of whom 63 were men (58.1 ± 22 years)
and 56 were women (54.4 ± 19.7 years). The number of participants per
age-decade was: 13 (6 males) in the range of 20-29 years, 16 (10 males) within
30-39 years, 31 (13 males ) within 40-49 years, 8 (5 males) within 50-59 years,
9 (3 males) within 60-69 years, 17 (10 males) within 70-79 years, 22 (13 males)
within 80-89 years, and 3 (3 males) within 90-99 years. Age did not differ
significantly between men and women. Following established BMI cutoff points
(33), the cohort consisted of 51 lean
participants (BMI < 25), 52 overweight participants (25 ≤ BMI
< 30), and 16 participants with obesity (BMI ≥ 30), while
following the National Institutes of Health cutoff points for WC, the cohort
consisted of 67 lean participants (WC < 94 cm for men and WC < 80
cm for women), 33 overweight participants (94 ≤ WC < 102 for men
and 80 ≤ WC < 88 for women), and 19 participants with obesity (WC
≥ 102 for men and WC ≥ 88 for women). The cohort included 85
Caucasians participants, 26 African American participants, and 8 Asians or
Pacific Islanders. Participants provided written informed consent and all
experimental procedures were performed in compliance with our local
Institutional Review Board.
Data acquisition
All MRI images were acquired on a 3T Philips MRI system (Achieva, Best,
The Netherlands). We used the quadrature body coil for radiofrequency (RF)
signal transmission and an eight-channel phased-array head coil for signal
reception. Each participant was studied using the following BMC-mcDESPOT imaging
protocol for MWF mapping:Ten 3D spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) images were
obtained with flip angles (FAs) incremented linearly from 2°
to 20°, with echo time (TE)/repetition time (TR) = 1.37/5 ms.
The acquisition matrix for all images was 150 × 130 ×
94, while the acquisition voxel size was 1.6 mm × 1.6 mm
× 1.6 mm. The total acquisition time was ~5 min.Ten 3D balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) images
were obtained with FAs of 2°, 7°, 11°,
16°, 24°, 32°, 40°, and 60°, with
TE/TR = 2.8/5.8 ms. To account for the off-resonance effects (34), all bSSFP images were
acquired with RF excitation phase increments of 0° or
180°. The acquisition matrix for all images was 150 ×
130 × 94, while the acquisition voxel size was 1.6 mm
× 1.6 mm × 1.6 mm. The total acquisition time was
~12 minTo correct for excitation RF inhomogeneity, we used the
double-angle method (DAM). For this, two fast spin-echo images were
acquired with FAs of 45° and 90°, TE = 102 ms, TR=
3000 ms, and acquisition voxel size of 2.6 mm × 2.6 mm
× 4 mm. The total acquisition time was ~4 min.All SPGR, bSSFP, and DAM images were acquired with
field-of-view of 240 mm × 208 mm × 150 mm, and
reconstructed to a voxel size of 1 mm × 1 mm × 1
mm.
Data processing
The scalp tissue was discarded using the FMRIB Software Library (FSL)
with the SPGR image averaged over all 10 FAs used as the input image (35). Then, the SPGR, bSSFP, and DAM images
were linearly registered to the averaged SPGR image. Next, a whole-brain MWF map
was generated for the parenchymal regions using BMC-mcDESPOT from the registered
SPGR, bSSFP, and DAM images (19–21, 23). Finally, the derived MWF map was nonlinearly
registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) standard space.Twenty-one white matter regions of interest (ROIs) were defined from the
MNI structural atlas corresponding to the whole brain (WB) white matter, frontal
lobes (FL), parietal lobes (PL), temporal lobes (TL), occipital lobes (OL),
cerebellum (CRB), body of corpus callosum (BCC), genu of corpus callosum (GCC),
splenium of corpus callosum (SCC), internal capsules (IC), cerebral peduncle
(CP), anterior corona radiata (ACR), posterior corona radiata (PCR), anterior
thalamic radiation (ATR), posterior thalamic radiation (PTR), inferior
fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), superior fronto-occipital fasciculus (SFOF),
inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF),
forceps minor (Fm), and forceps major (FM) (Fig.
1). ROIs were eroded to avoid partial volume contamination from
adjacent structures. Within each ROI, the mean MWF was calculated.
Figure 1.
Visualization of the white matter ROIs investigated. 1) Frontal lobes,
2) Parietal lobes, 3) Occipital lobes, 4) Cerebellum, 5) Splenium of corpus
callosum, 6) Body of corpus callosum, 7) Genu of corpus callosum, 8) Internal
capsule, 9) Temporal lobes, 10) Forceps major, 11) Forceps minor, 12) Anterior
corona radiata, 13) Inferior longitudinal fasciculus, 14) Cerebral peduncles,
15) Anterior thalamic radiation, 16) Posterior corona radiata, 17) Superior
longitudinal fasciculus, 18) Posterior thalamic radiation, 19) Inferior
fronto-occipital fasciculus, and 20) Superior fronto-occipital fasciculus.
Statistical analysis
For each ROI, the correlation between BMI or WC and MWF was investigated
using multiple linear regression with the mean MWF within the ROI as the
dependent variable and BMI or WC, sex, ethnicity, age, and age2 as
independent variables, after mean age centering. The inclusion of
age2 as an independent variable is based on our and
others’ recent observations that myelination follows a quadratic
relationship with age (25, 36).To investigate the associations between BMI or WC and MWF between the
groups of subjects with healthy weight (lean), overweight, and obesity, we
performed between-group ANCOVA analyses for each ROI. These included
i) obese vs. lean groups,
ii) overweight vs. lean groups, and
iii) obese vs. overweight groups. All
between-group comparisons controlled for sex, ethnicity, age and
age2.The threshold for statistical significance was set to p
< 0.05 after correction for multiple ROI comparisons using the false
discovery rate (FDR) method for all statistical analyses. Calculations were
performed with MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). All MATLAB codes are
available upon request from the corresponding author.
RESULTS
Figure 2 shows regression relationships
between MWF and BMI, after adjusting for sex, ethnicity, age, and age2,
for the indicated 21 cerebral white matter regions. Visual inspection indicates that
larger BMI corresponds to lower MWF in all examined ROIs, with the best-fit lines
displaying regional variation in this relationship. Further, the multiple regression
analysis indicates that this negative correlation between MWF and BMI was
statistically significant (pBMI < 0.05) or close to
significance (pBMI < 0.1) in most brain regions investigated
(Table 1). In addition, our results
indicate that the steepest negative slopes in MWF versus BMI were found in the
corona radiata and thalamic radiation regions, while the smallest slopes were found
in the forceps minor and cerebral peduncle regions. Comparison of each of the
steepest and smallest slopes indicated statistically significantly different slopes
between the posterior corona radiata and the forceps minor or cerebral peduncle
(p < 0.05; Z-test computed as the difference between the
two slopes divided by the square root of the sum of the squared standard error of
the slopes (37)). Furthermore, as expected,
significant age effects were found for all brain regions evaluated (Table 1). Similarly, the quadratic effect of age,
age2, was statistically significant or close to significance in most
brain regions (Table 1).
Figure 2.
Regression results for the relationship between MWF and BMI adjusted for
age, age2, sex, and ethnicity (N = 119). Results are
shown for 21 brain structures/ROIs. For each ROI, the coefficient of
determination, R, of the multiple
linear regression model is reported with the symbol * indicating significance at
p < 0.01. All ROIs exhibited significant negative
correlations between MWF and BMI. WB: whole brain white matter, FL: frontal
lobes, PL: parietal lobes, TL: temporal lobes, OL: occipital lobes, CRB:
cerebellum, BCC: body of corpus callosum, GCC: genu of corpus callosum, SCC:
splenium of corpus callosum, IC: internal capsules, CP: cerebral peduncle, ACR:
anterior corona radiata, PCR: posterior corona radiata, ATR: anterior thalamic
radiation, PTR: posterior thalamic radiation, IFOF: inferior fronto-occipital
fasciculus, SFOF: superior fronto-occipital fasciculus, ILF: inferior
longitudinal fasciculus, SLF: superior longitudinal fasciculus, Fm: forceps
minor, FM: forceps major.
Table 1.
Slope, β, and significance, p,
of the regression terms incorporated in the multiple linear regression given by:
MWF ~ β +
β × BMI +
β × age +
β
×age2 +
β × sex +
β ×
ethnicity. Sex and ethnicity results are not shown as they exhibited
non-significant associations with MWF in all ROIs. All p-values
presented are obtained after FDR correction.
MWF
BMI
Age
Age2
βBMI (×
103)
pBMI
βage (×
104)
page
βage2 (×
105)
page2
WB
−1.46
0.053
−7.19
0.000
−2.06
0.012
FL
−1.68
0.049
−8.56
0.000
−2.29
0.012
OL
−1.37
0.099
−5.73
0.000
−2.29
0.019
PL
−1.45
0.036
−6.34
0.000
−2.08
0.013
TL
−1.75
0.029
−8.68
0.000
−2.16
0.012
CRB
−1.06
0.108
−4.52
0.000
−1.11
0.104
BCC
−1.36
0.100
−7.53
0.000
−1.79
0.038
GCC
−1.90
0.019
−9.51
0.000
−1.55
0.034
SCC
−1.58
0.036
−6.92
0.000
−2.51
0.012
IC
−1.53
0.053
−7.17
0.000
−1.74
0.026
CP
−0.93
0.137
−3.15
0.000
−0.91
0.156
ACR
−2.38
0.017
−10.30
0.000
−1.93
0.030
PCR
−3.09
0.005
−11.15
0.000
−2.59
0.012
ATR
−2.18
0.017
−8.82
0.000
−1.49
0.056
PTR
−1.76
0.050
−9.60
0.000
−2.10
0.021
SFOF
−1.90
0.036
−10.42
0.000
−2.30
0.012
IFOF
−1.76
0.053
−9.10
0.000
−2.10
0.024
SLF
−2.54
0.005
−8.55
0.000
−2.11
0.012
ILF
−1.68
0.005
−7.57
0.000
−2.17
0.023
Fm
−1.70
0.055
−7.25
0.000
−2.39
0.012
FM
−0.50
0.508
−3.81
0.001
−1.65
0.044
MWF: myelin water fraction, BMI: body mass index, WB: whole brain,
FL: frontal lobes, PL: parietal lobes, TL: temporal lobes, OL: occipital
lobes, CRB: cerebellum, BCC: body of corpus callosum, GCC: genu of corpus
callosum, SCC: splenium of corpus callosum, IC: internal capsules, CP:
cerebral peduncle, ACR: anterior corona radiata, PCR: posterior corona
radiata, ATR: anterior thalamic radiation, PTR: posterior thalamic
radiation, IFOF: inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, SFOF: superior
fronto-occipital fasciculus, ILF: inferior longitudinal fasciculus, SLF:
superior longitudinal fasciculus, Fm: forceps minor, FM: forceps major.
Figure 3 shows regression relationships
between MWF and WC, after adjusting for sex, ethnicity, age, and age2,
for the indicated 21 cerebral white matter regions. Visual inspection indicates that
larger WC corresponds to lower MWF in all examined ROIs, with the best-fit lines
displaying regional variation. Further, the multiple regression analysis indicates
that this negative correlation between MWF and WC was statistically significant
(pWC < 0.05) or close to significance
(pWC < 0.1) in most brain regions investigated (Table 2). In addition, our results indicate
that the steepest negative slopes in MWF with WC were found in the corona radiata,
longitudinal fasciculus, and thalamic radiation regions, while the smallest slopes
were found in the forceps minor and cerebral peduncle regions. Comparison of each of
the steepest and smallest slopes indicated statistically significantly different
slopes between the posterior corona radiata or posterior longitudinal fasciculus and
the forceps minor or cerebral peduncle. Furthermore, as expected, significant age
effects were found for all brain regions evaluated (Table 2). Similarly, the quadratic effect of age, age2, was
statistically significant in most brain regions (Table 2).
Figure 3.
Regression results for the relationship between MWF and WC adjusted for
age, age2, sex, and ethnicity (N = 119). Results are
shown for 21 brain structures/ROIs. For each ROI, the coefficient of
determination, R, of the multiple
linear regression model is reported with the symbol * indicating significance at
p < 0.01. All ROIs exhibited significant negative
correlations between MWF and WC. WB: whole brain white matter, FL: frontal
lobes, PL: parietal lobes, TL: temporal lobes, OL: occipital lobes, CRB:
cerebellum, BCC: body of corpus callosum, GCC: genu of corpus callosum, SCC:
splenium of corpus callosum, IC: internal capsules, CP: cerebral peduncle, ACR:
anterior corona radiata, PCR: posterior corona radiata, ATR: anterior thalamic
radiation, PTR: posterior thalamic radiation, IFOF: inferior fronto-occipital
fasciculus, SFOF: superior fronto-occipital fasciculus, ILF: inferior
longitudinal fasciculus, SLF: superior longitudinal fasciculus, Fm: forceps
minor, FM: forceps major.
Table 2.
Slope, β, and significance, p,
of the regression terms incorporated in the multiple linear regression given by:
MWF ~ β +
β × WC +
β × age +
β
×age2 +
β × sex +
β ×
ethnicity. The results of sex and ethnicity are not shown as they exhibited
non-significant associations with MWF in all ROIs. All p-values
presented are obtained after FDR correction.
MWF
WC
Age
Age2
βWC (×
104)
pWC
βage (×
104)
page
βage2 (×
105)
page2
WB
−8.28
0.005
−6.23
0.000
−2.30
0.003
FL
−9.02
0.005
−7.52
0.000
−2.56
0.003
OL
−8.83
0.008
−4.67
0.000
−2.56
0.008
PL
−9.08
0.005
−5.30
0.000
−2.34
0.003
TL
−9.36
0.005
−7.57
0.000
−2.44
0.008
CRB
−5.98
0.026
−3.83
0.000
−1.29
0.058
BCC
−8.51
0.011
−6.52
0.000
−2.05
0.016
GCC
−8.69
0.005
−8.55
0.000
−1.79
0.014
SCC
−8.57
0.007
−5.93
0.000
−2.76
0.003
IC
−7.61
0.011
−6.31
0.000
−1.95
0.011
CP
−5.89
0.023
−2.45
0.000
−1.10
0.089
ACR
−10.90
0.005
−9.10
0.000
−2.23
0.011
PCR
−13.66
0.002
−9.65
0.000
−2.96
0.003
ATR
−10.35
0.005
−7.67
0.000
−1.78
0.023
PTR
−10.16
0.005
−8.41
0.000
−2.40
0.006
SFOF
−8.59
0.008
−9.48
0.000
−2.54
0.003
IFOF
−9.34
0.008
−8.02
0.000
−2.38
0.009
SLF
−12.08
0.000
−7.20
0.000
−2.44
0.003
ILF
−9.71
0.007
−6.43
0.000
−2.30
0.008
Fm
−10.01
0.005
−6.072
0.000
−2.56
0.003
FM
−3.95
0.210
−3.32
0.003
−2.56
0.029
MWF: myelin water fraction, WC: waist circumference, WB: whole
brain, FL: frontal lobes, PL: parietal lobes, TL: temporal lobes, OL:
occipital lobes, CRB: cerebellum, BCC: body of corpus callosum, GCC: genu of
corpus callosum, SCC: splenium of corpus callosum, IC: internal capsules,
CP: cerebral peduncle, ACR: anterior corona radiata, PCR: posterior corona
radiata, ATR: anterior thalamic radiation, PTR: posterior thalamic
radiation, IFOF: inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, SFOF: superior
fronto-occipital fasciculus, ILF: inferior longitudinal fasciculus, SLF:
superior longitudinal fasciculus, Fm: forceps minor, FM: forceps major.
We further note that with a null hypothesis of no relationship between MWF
and BMI or WC, the probability of a given regression relationship exhibiting a slope
greater than zero, Pr = 0.5, equals the probability of it exhibiting a slope less
than zero. The probability then of all these 21 regional relationships exhibiting a
negative slope, as we found (Fig. 2), is Pr =
0.521 < 10−6. Though not regionally
specific, this provides further strong statistical support to the hypothesized
inverse relationship between BMI or WC and myelin content.Table 3 summarizes the results of the
between-group ANCOVA analyses of the associations between BMI or WC and MWF. In
comparing subjects with obesity to lean subjects, we found significantly lower MWF
in the group of subjects with obesity in all ROIs despite controlling for age,
age2, sex, and ethnicity. Moreover, controlling for these same
covariates, while comparison of overweight to lean subjects as defined by BMI did
not show statistically significant differences in MWF, we found significantly lower
MWF in the overweight group as compared to the lean group as defined by WC, in
various ROIs before or after FDR correction. Further, in comparing subjects with
obesity to overweight subjects as defined by BMI, we found significantly lower MWF
in the group of subjects with obesity in most ROI; however, this finding as
restricted to only a few ROIs, before FDR correction, when the groups were defined
by WC.
Table 3.
Significance, p-value, of the between-group ANCOVA
analyses of the effect of BMI or WC on MWF in all ROIs. All between-group
comparisons were controlled for age, age2, sex, and ethnicity. All
p-values presented are obtained after FDR correction.
Obese vs. Lean
Overweight vs. Lean
Obese vs. Overweight
BMI
WC
BMI
WC
BMI
WC
WB
0.033
0.002
0.865
0.165*
0.0156
0.045
FL
0.033
0.002
0.967
0.165*
0.0150
0.040
OL
0.046
0.003
0.936
0.165
0.038
0.528
PL
0.030
0.000
0.927
0.100
0.0156
0.040
TL
0.033
0.002
0.754
0.166*
0.145
0.043
CRB
0.063
0.004
0.608
0.131
0.238
0.726
BCC
0.045
0.002
0.979
0.180*
0.086
0.528
GCC
0.030
0.006
0.795
0.165
0.038
0.400
SCC
0.030
0.002
0.763
0.147
0.015
0.528
IC
0.054
0.011
0.984
0.294
0.034
0.400*
CP
0.126
0.016
0.722
0.180
0.213
0.522
ACR
0.030
0.003
0.706
0.215
0.038
0.528*
PCR
0.003
0.000
0.288
0.012
0.015
0.528
ATR
0.046
0.008
0.538
0.165*
0.102*
0.462
PTR
0.030
0.002
0.712
0.037
0.038
0.528
SFOF
0.037
0.003
0.281
0.215
0.086
0.405
IFOF
0.064
0.007
0.735
0.355
0.039
0.400*
SLF
0.003
0.000
0.312
0.091
0.015
0.401*
ILF
0.050
0.004
0.722
0.309
0.015
0.401*
Fm
0.033
0.002
0.827
0.031
0.038
0.533
FM
0.096
0.236
0.584*
0.674
0.010
0.528
MWF: myelin water fraction, BMI: body mass index, WB: whole brain,
FL: frontal lobes, PL: parietal lobes, TL: temporal lobes, OL: occipital
lobes, CRB: cerebellum, BCC: body of corpus callosum, GCC: genu of corpus
callosum, SCC: splenium of corpus callosum, IC: internal capsules, CP:
cerebral peduncle, ACR: anterior corona radiata, PCR: posterior corona
radiata, ATR: anterior thalamic radiation, PTR: posterior thalamic
radiation, IFOF: inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, SFOF: superior
fronto-occipital fasciculus, ILF: inferior longitudinal fasciculus, SLF:
superior longitudinal fasciculus, Fm: forceps minor, FM: forceps major.
indicates significance or close to significance before FDR
correction (but lost significance after FDR correction).
DISCUSSION
Using advanced MR methodology for myelin content quantification, in this
study, we provided the first demonstration of associations between obesity and MWF.
We found a strong quantitative relationship between obesity, measured either by BMI
or WC, and lower myelin content. These associations were observed in a large cohort
of cognitively unimpaired subjects spanning a wide age range and were statistically
significant in several critical brain regions, even after adjusting for age,
ethnicity, and sex. These results do not prove, but strongly suggest, a causal link
between obesity and white matter integrity, especially myelin content, also
consistent with basic science and animal data (9, 11–13, 15–17, 31, 32).We found that the brain regions investigated exhibit similar trends but
different slopes for obesity, as measured by WC or BMI, vs.
myelination (Fig. 2). Interestingly, these
negative slopes were the largest in magnitude for the corona radiata, longitudinal
fasciculus, and thalamic radiation structures (Tables 1–2). These fiber
pathways carry most of the neural traffic to and from the cerebral cortex and have
been shown to be susceptible to a number of pathologies, including
leukoencephalopathy and multiple sclerosis (38, 39); these conditions are
associated with deficits in intellectual, social, and emotional functioning (40, 41).
Furthermore, epidemiological studies have showed that these regions are particularly
prone to atrophy and microstructural changes with obesity (42–46);
these structural changes could be partially explained by the lower myelin content
observed here. Moreover, our results indicated that the anterior lobes, including
the frontal and temporal lobes, exhibited more rapid decrease in MWF with age, BMI,
or WC as compared to the other lobes (Tables
1–2). This pattern is
consistent with the retrogenesis hypothesis, in which posterior brain regions are
spared from degeneration as compared to anterior brain regions (47–50).
However, longitudinal and histological investigations are required to elucidate the
mechanisms underlying this vulnerability and concomitant rapid decline in structural
integrity.Our results indicated that overweight subjects have lower myelin content
than lean subjects in various cerebral white matter structures (Table 3). The difference was generally lower in
magnitude compared to the obese vs. normal results. Our results
agree with Raji and colleagues’ observations of association between higher
BMI and lower brain WM volumes in subjects with obesity and, to a lesser extent, in
overweight subjects (42). Accelerated
demyelination in WM structures observed here, and subsequent axonal loss, could
explain these consistent observations of WM atrophy with obesity (42, 51–53). Interestingly,
unlike BMI, WC was sensitive enough to capture differences in myelin content between
overweight and lean subjects. Besides differences in the number of subjects per
group due to the BMI or WC stratifications, the BMI is not a robust surrogate for
body fat mass, while high BMI does not necessarily result in a higher mortality
(54, 55). In contrast, WC provides higher predictive power of disease risk
than does BMI (56, 57). Indeed, increased WC indicates increased
susceptibility to insulin resistance, cancer, and dyslipidemia due to its strong
association with visceral fat (33, 58, 59).Our results indicate a quadratic association between myelin content and age
in all white matter regions investigated (Tables
1–2), in agreement with
previous studies (25, 36). This association is attributed to the process of
myelination from young adulthood through middle age, followed by demyelination
afterward (36, 60); this agrees with postmortem studies and with MRI
studies based on myelin-sensitive methods such as relaxation times and diffusion
tensor imaging.Obesity may represent a modifiable risk factor for disruption of white
matter integrity, and therefore an important therapeutic target. Our results
indicate the possibility of a direct link between obesity and myelin breakdown, and
therefore provides a foundation for further investigation of, for example, the
effect of diet and physical activity on myelination and cognitive function.Our work, while conducted on a large cohort, has several limitations. Our
dataset is cross-sectional, and longitudinal and intervention studies will be
required to establish a causal relationship between MWF and BMI or WC. Such work is
underway. Moreover, errors may have arisen from imperfect registration and
segmentation. Finally, MWF estimation could be biased by several experimental and
physiological parameters that are not incorporated into the BMC-mcDESPOT formalism.
These include, but not limited to, differential water diffusion in the underlying
compartments, exchange between water pools, and iron content.In conclusion, in this first study examining the association between obesity
and cerebral myelin content in a large cohort and across a wide age range of
cognitively normal subjects, we showed that lower myelin content is associated with
obesity in most cerebral white matter structures.
Authors: Zuhaib F Bhat; James D Morton; Sue Mason; Alaa El-Din A Bekhit; Hina Fayaz Bhat Journal: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 11.176
Authors: Honglei Chen; Shumin M Zhang; Michael A Schwarzschild; Miguel A Hernán; Walter C Willett; Alberto Ascherio Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Chelsea M Stillman; Andrea M Weinstein; Anna L Marsland; Peter J Gianaros; Kirk I Erickson Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Curtis Triebswetter; Matthew Kiely; Nikkita Khattar; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick; Richard G Spencer; Mustapha Bouhrara Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Farzaneh Rahmani; Qing Wang; Nicole S McKay; Sarah Keefe; Nancy Hantler; Russ Hornbeck; Yong Wang; Jason Hassenstab; Suzanne Schindler; Chengjie Xiong; John C Morris; Tammie L S Benzinger; Cyrus A Raji Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2022 Impact factor: 4.160
Authors: Mustapha Bouhrara; Luis E Cortina; Nikkita Khattar; Abinand C Rejimon; Samuel Ajamu; Defne S Cezayirli; Richard G Spencer Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 5.682
Authors: Nikkita Khattar; Curtis Triebswetter; Matthew Kiely; Luigi Ferrucci; Susan M Resnick; Richard G Spencer; Mustapha Bouhrara Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-06-15 Impact factor: 7.400