Literature DB >> 33482792

Prognostic impact of the prognostic nutritional index in cases of resected oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Atsushi Abe1, Hiroki Hayashi2, Takanori Ishihama2, Hiroshi Furuta2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The systemic inflammatory response and nutritional status of patients with malignant tumors are related to postoperative results. We examined the usefulness of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) as a prognostic tool in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radical surgery.
METHODS: From 2008 to 2019, 102 patients (73 males, 29 females; age, 65.6 ± 9.8 years) who visited our hospital and underwent surgical therapy were included in this study. The endpoint was the total survival period, and the evaluation markers included the lymphocyte count and albumin level in peripheral blood obtained 4 weeks preoperatively, age, sex, alcohol consumption, smoking history, site of the tumor, pathological stage, and surgery status. The PNI was calculated using serum albumin levels and the peripheral blood lymphocyte count. The relationship between the PNI and patient characteristics were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the survival rate. The survival periods were compared using the log-rank method. We evaluated the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: The tumor sites included the maxilla (n = 12), buccal mucosa (n = 11), mandible (n = 17), floor of the mouth (n = 9), and tongue (n = 53). The number of patients with stage I, II, III, and IV oral cancers was 28 (27.5%), 34 (27.5%), 26 (33.3%), and 14 (13.7%), respectively. During the observation period, 21 patients died of head and neck cancer. The optimal cut-off PNI value was 42.9, according to the receiver operating characteristic analysis. The proportion of patients with a short OS was lower in those with PNI higher than 42.9, and the 5-year OS in patients with PNI higher and lower than the cut-off value was 62.3% and 86.0%, respectively (P = 0.0105).
CONCLUSIONS: The OS of patients with PNI < 42.9 was lower than that of patients with PNI ≥ 42.9. The PNI, which is a preoperative head-to-foot inflammatory marker, can help in estimating the prognosis of oral cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Nutritional status; Oral cancer; Prognosis; Systemic inflammation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33482792      PMCID: PMC7821535          DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01394-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Oral Health        ISSN: 1472-6831            Impact factor:   2.757


  66 in total

Review 1.  A review of head and neck cancer staging system in the TNM classification of malignant tumors (eighth edition).

Authors:  Nobuya Monden; Takahiro Asakage; Naomi Kiyota; Akihiro Homma; Kazuto Matsuura; Nobuhiro Hanai; Takeshi Kodaira; Sadamoto Zenda; Hirofumi Fujii; Makoto Tahara; Tomoya Yokota; Tetsuo Akimoto; Shigemichi Iwae; Tetsuro Onitsuka; Takenori Ogawa; Susumu Okano; Shunji Takahashi; Yasushi Shimizu; Koichiro Yonezawa; Ryuichi Hayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Preoperative measurement of tumor thickness of oral tongue carcinoma with intraoral ultrasonography.

Authors:  Anthony Po-Wing Yuen; Raymond Wai-Man Ng; Paul Kin-Yip Lam; Ambrose Ho
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Pretreatment neutrophil count as an independent prognostic factor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of Japan Multinational Trial Organisation LC00-03.

Authors:  Satoshi Teramukai; Toshiyuki Kitano; Yusuke Kishida; Masaaki Kawahara; Kaoru Kubota; Kiyoshi Komuta; Koichi Minato; Tadashi Mio; Yuka Fujita; Toshiro Yonei; Kikuo Nakano; Masahiro Tsuboi; Kazuhiko Shibata; Kiyoyuki Furuse; Masanori Fukushima
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Prognostic Significance of Pre- to Postoperative Dynamics of the Prognostic Nutritional Index for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Radical Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Minyong Kang; Chun Tae Chang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Prognostic Nutritional Index, Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Kazuo Okadome; Yoshifumi Baba; Taisuke Yagi; Yuki Kiyozumi; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Yuji Miyamoto; Naoya Yoshida; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Head and neck cancers, version 2.2013. Featured updates to the NCCN guidelines.

Authors:  David G Pfister; Kie-Kian Ang; David M Brizel; Barbara A Burtness; Paul M Busse; Jimmy J Caudell; Anthony J Cmelak; A Dimitrios Colevas; Frank Dunphy; David W Eisele; Jill Gilbert; Maura L Gillison; Robert I Haddad; Bruce H Haughey; Wesley L Hicks; Ying J Hitchcock; Merrill S Kies; William M Lydiatt; Ellie Maghami; Renato Martins; Thomas McCaffrey; Bharat B Mittal; Harlan A Pinto; John A Ridge; Sandeep Samant; David E Schuller; Jatin P Shah; Sharon Spencer; Randal S Weber; Gregory T Wolf; Frank Worden; Sue S Yom; Nicole R McMillian; Miranda Hughes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Combination of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and platelet lymphocyte ratio is a useful predictor of postoperative survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji-Feng Feng; Ying Huang; Jin-Shi Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Value of the prognostic nutritional index and weight loss in predicting metastasis and long-term mortality in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Jing Du; Ling-Long Tang; Yan-Ping Mao; Rui Guo; Ying Sun; Ai-Hua Lin; Jun Ma
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Impact of prognostic nutritional index on long-term outcomes in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomomi Mohri; Yasuhiko Mohri; Tsunehiko Shigemori; Kenji Takeuchi; Yoshiyuki Itoh; Toshio Kato
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  The preoperative prognostic nutritional index is a predictive and prognostic factor of high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Zheng Feng; Hao Wen; Xingzhu Ju; Rui Bi; Xiaojun Chen; Wentao Yang; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Toxicity in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy in Association with Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Fanetti; Jerry Polesel; Elisabetta Fratta; Elena Muraro; Valentina Lupato; Salvatore Alfieri; Carlo Gobitti; Emilio Minatel; Fabio Matrone; Angela Caroli; Alberto Revelant; Marco Lionello; Viviana Zammattio Polentin; Andrea Ferretti; Roberto Guerrieri; Paola Chiovati; Andy Bertolin; Vittorio Giacomarra; Antonino De Paoli; Emanuela Vaccher; Giovanna Sartor; Agostino Steffan; Giovanni Franchin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.717

2.  Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Changqing Mao; Weixin Xu; Weina Ma; Chun Wang; Zhaojiao Guo; Jun Yan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Prognostic impact of prognostic nutritional index on renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 7,629 patients.

Authors:  Qingping Peng; Ling Liu; Ting Li; Changjiang Lei; Huan Wan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.