Literature DB >> 28975525

Prognostic Significance of Pre- to Postoperative Dynamics of the Prognostic Nutritional Index for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Radical Nephrectomy.

Minyong Kang1, Chun Tae Chang1, Hyun Hwan Sung1, Hwang Gyun Jeon1, Byong Chang Jeong1, Seong Il Seo1, Seong Soo Jeon1, Han Yong Choi1, Hyun Moo Lee2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the prognostic role of Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) dynamics in the pre- and postoperative periods for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who undergo radical nephrectomy (RN).
METHODS: The study analyzed 324 patients with RCC who underwent RN. The overall population was classified into four groups according to four types of pre- to postoperative PNI dynamics as follows: group 1 (low → low PNI), group 2 (low → high PNI), group 3 (high → low PNI), and group 4 (high → high PNI). The level of PNI was calculated using the following formula: 10 × serum albumin level (g/dL) + 0.005 × absolute lymphocyte counts in blood (/mm3). The primary end point was cancer-specific survival (CSS), and the secondary end point was overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: The patients with higher pre- and postoperative PNI (>45) had better survival outcomes than those with lower pre- and postoperative PNI (≤45). Notably, the patients in group 4 showed the best CSS and OS rates, whereas the patients in group 1 had the worst survival outcomes. Furthermore, PNI dynamics were identified as an independent predictor of CSS and OS outcomes, in addition to pre- and postoperative PNI, tumor size, and pathologic T (pT) stage. The patients with localized RCC (≤pT2) showed significant differences in both CSS and OS estimates, whereas the patients with advanced pT stage (≥pT3) demonstrated a difference only in OS outcomes, according to PNI dynamics.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to provide the independent prognostic importance of dynamics of nutritional status for patients with RCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28975525     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6065-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

1.  Prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dan Li; Xia Yuan; Jia Liu; Changling Li; Weimin Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index in patients with glioblastomas.

Authors:  Jin-Duo Ding; Kun Yao; Peng-Fei Wang; Chang-Xiang Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Xuechao Liu; Deyao Zhang; Enzi Lin; Yongming Chen; Wei Li; Yingbo Chen; Xiaowei Sun; Zhiwei Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Is prognostic nutritional index a predictive marker for estimating all-cause in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular risk factors?

Authors:  Tufan Çınar; Mert İlker Hayıroğlu; Vedat Çiçek; Şahhan Kılıç; Süha Asal; Samet Yavuz; Murat Selçuk; Emre Yalçınkaya; Nurgül Keser; Ahmet Lütfullah Orhan
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  Prognostic impact of the prognostic nutritional index in cases of resected oral squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Atsushi Abe; Hiroki Hayashi; Takanori Ishihama; Hiroshi Furuta
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  The Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status Score in Ovarian Cancer: Influence on Prognosis, Surgical Outcome, and Postoperative Complication Rate.

Authors:  Christine Bekos; Christoph Grimm; Lisa Gensthaler; Thomas Bartl; Alexander Reinthaller; Richard Schwameis; Stephan Polterauer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Changqing Mao; Weixin Xu; Weina Ma; Chun Wang; Zhaojiao Guo; Jun Yan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Prognostic Significance of Pre- to Postoperative Dynamics of Sarcopenia for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Laparoscopic Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Shuqiu Chen; Ting He; Si Sun; Jianping Wu; Bin Xu; Weipu Mao; Ming Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-21

9.  Prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sung Ryul Shim; Sun Il Kim; Se Joong Kim; Dae Sung Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 10.  Host-related factors and cancer: Malnutrition and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Salvatrice Mancuso; Marta Mattana; Marco Santoro; Melania Carlisi; Silvio Buscemi; Sergio Siragusa
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 4.850

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.