Literature DB >> 33481840

Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France.

Franck Maunoury1, Anaïs Oury2, Sophie Fortin2, Laetitia Thomassin3, Serge Bohbot3.   

Abstract

This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of Technology Lipido-Colloid with Nano Oligo Saccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) wound dressings versus neutral dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) from a French collective perspective. We used a Markov microsimulation cohort model to simulate the DFU monthly progression over the lifetime horizon. Our study employed a mixed method design with model inputs including data from interventional and observational studies, French databases and expert opinion. The demographic characteristics of the simulated population and clinical efficacy were based on the EXPLORER double-blind randomized controlled trial. Health-related quality of life, costs, and resource use inputs were taken from the literature relevant to the French context. The main outcomes included life-years without DFU (LYsw/DFU), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), amputations, and lifetime costs. To assess the robustness of the results, sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on the wound duration at treatment initiation were performed. Treatment with the TLC-NOSF dressing led to total cost savings per patient of EUR 35,489, associated with gains of 0.50 LYw/DFU and 0.16 QALY. TLC-NOSF dressings were established as the dominant strategy in the base case and all sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, the model revealed that, for every 100 patients treated with TLC-NOSF dressings, two amputations could be avoided. According to the subgroup analysis results, the sooner the TLC-NOSF treatment was initiated, the better were the outcomes, with the highest benefits for ulcers with a duration of two months or less (+0.65 LYw/DFU, +0.23 QALY, and cost savings of EUR 55,710). The results from the French perspective are consistent with the ones from the German and British perspectives. TLC-NOSF dressings are cost-saving compared to neutral dressings, leading to an increase in patients' health benefits and a decrease in the associated treatment costs. These results can thus be used to guide healthcare decisionmakers. The potential savings could represent EUR 3,345 per treated patient per year and even reach EUR 4,771 when TLC-NOSF dressings are used as first line treatment. The EXPLORER trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01717183.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33481840      PMCID: PMC7822547          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  30 in total

Review 1.  Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Andrew J M Boulton; Sicco A Bus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The reality of routine practice: a pooled data analysis on chronic wounds treated with TLC-NOSF wound dressings.

Authors:  K C Münter; S Meaume; M Augustin; P Senet; J C Kérihuel
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.072

3.  Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.

Authors:  Don Husereau; Michael Drummond; Stavros Petrou; Chris Carswell; David Moher; Dan Greenberg; Federico Augustovski; Andrew H Briggs; Josephine Mauskopf; Elizabeth Loder
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide.

Authors:  F A Sonnenberg; J R Beck
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  A randomized, controlled, double-blind prospective trial with a Lipido-Colloid Technology-Nano-OligoSaccharide Factor wound dressing in the local management of venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Sylvie Meaume; François Truchetet; Frédéric Cambazard; Catherine Lok; Clélia Debure; Sophie Dalac; Isabelle Lazareth; Michèle-Léa Sigal; Anne Sauvadet; Serge Bohbot; Anne Dompmartin
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  An economic evaluation of VAC therapy compared with wound dressings in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  S Flack; J Apelqvist; M Keith; P Trueman; D Williams
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  Effectiveness of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Prashanth Vas; Gerry Rayman; Ketan Dhatariya; Vickie Driver; Agnes Hartemann; Magnus Londahl; Alberto Piaggesi; Jan Apelqvist; Chris Attinger; Fran Game
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.876

Review 8.  Guidelines on use of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).

Authors:  Gerry Rayman; Prashanth Vas; Ketan Dhatariya; Vickie Driver; Agnes Hartemann; Magnus Londahl; Alberto Piaggesi; Jan Apelqvist; Chris Attinger; Fran Game
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.876

9.  An evidence-based model comparing the cost-effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma gel to alternative therapies for patients with nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Edward J Dougherty
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Impact of wound duration on diabetic foot ulcer healing: evaluation of a new sucrose octasulfate wound dressing.

Authors:  Ralf Lobmann; Arthur Grünerbel; Holger Lawall; Claas Lüdemann; Stephan Morbach; Wolfgang Tigges; Lukas Völkel; Reinhard Pt Rychlik
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.072

View more
  1 in total

1.  Role of the Healico© Wound Care Smartphone Application in Preventing a Foot Amputation in a 65-Year-Old Patient with Diabetes.

Authors:  Almudena Cecilia Matilla; Alejandra Cobo Mena; Adriana Arpa Giménez; Julia Fernández Morata
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.