Literature DB >> 32176446

Effectiveness of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes: a systematic review.

Prashanth Vas1, Gerry Rayman2, Ketan Dhatariya3, Vickie Driver4, Agnes Hartemann5, Magnus Londahl6,7, Alberto Piaggesi8, Jan Apelqvist9, Chris Attinger10, Fran Game11.   

Abstract

The management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) remains a challenge, and there is continuing uncertainty concerning optimal approaches to wound healing. The International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) working group on wound healing has previously published systematic reviews of the evidence in 2008, 2012 and 2016 to inform protocols for routine care and to highlight areas which should be considered for further study. The working group has now updated this review by considering papers on the interventions to improve the healing of DFU's published between June 2014 and August 2018. Methodological quality of selected studies was independently assessed by a minimum of two reviewers using the recently published 21-point questionnaire as recommended by IWGDF/European Wound Management Association, as well as the previously incorporated Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Of the 2275 papers identified, 97 were finally selected for grading following full text review. Overall, there has been an improvement in study design and a significant rise in the number of published studies. While previous systematic reviews did not find any evidence to justify the use of newer therapies, except for negative pressure wound therapy in post-surgical wounds, in this review we found additional evidence to support some interventions including a sucrose-octasulfate dressing, the combined leucocyte, fibrin and platelet patch as well as topical application of some placental membrane products, all when used in addition to usual best care. Nonetheless, the assessment and comparison of published trials remains difficult with marked clinical heterogeneity between studies: in patient selection, study duration, standard of usual care provision and the timing and description of the clinical endpoints.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  debridement; diabetic foot; dressing; foot ulcer; guidelines; hyperbaric oxygen; negative pressure wound therapy; placental-derived products; topical oxygen; wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32176446     DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev        ISSN: 1520-7552            Impact factor:   4.876


  9 in total

1.  Photoacoustic monitoring of angiogenesis predicts response to therapy in healing wounds.

Authors:  Yash Mantri; Jason Tsujimoto; Brian Donovan; Christopher C Fernandes; Pranav S Garimella; William F Penny; Caesar A Anderson; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Australian guideline on wound healing interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers: part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease.

Authors:  Pamela Chen; Keryln Carville; Terry Swanson; Peter A Lazzarini; James Charles; Jane Cheney; Jenny Prentice
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 3.  The Role of High-Density Lipoproteins in Endothelial Cell Metabolism and Diabetes-Impaired Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Khalia R Primer; Peter J Psaltis; Joanne T M Tan; Christina A Bursill
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Cost-effectiveness of TLC-NOSF dressings versus neutral dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in France.

Authors:  Franck Maunoury; Anaïs Oury; Sophie Fortin; Laetitia Thomassin; Serge Bohbot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Translational development of ABCB5+ dermal mesenchymal stem cells for therapeutic induction of angiogenesis in non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Andreas Kerstan; Kathrin Dieter; Elke Niebergall-Roth; Markus H Frank; Mark A Kluth; Sabrina Klingele; Michael Jünger; Christoph Hasslacher; Georg Daeschlein; Lutz Stemler; Ulrich Meyer-Pannwitt; Kristin Schubert; Gerhard Klausmann; Titus Raab; Matthias Goebeler; Korinna Kraft; Jasmina Esterlechner; Hannes M Schröder; Samar Sadeghi; Seda Ballikaya; Martin Gasser; Ana M Waaga-Gasser; George F Murphy; Dennis P Orgill; Natasha Y Frank; Christoph Ganss; Karin Scharffetter-Kochanek
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 8.079

Review 6.  Reduced Hospitalizations and Amputations in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated with Cyclical Pressurized Topical Wound Oxygen Therapy: Real-World Outcomes.

Authors:  Jessica Izhakoff Yellin; Julia A Gaebler; Frank F Zhou; Timothy Niecko; Olivia Novins; Amelia Ockert; Darcy Krzynowek; Matthew G Garoufalis; Aliza M Lee; Robert G Frykberg
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.947

Review 7.  Managing Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Pharmacotherapy for Wound Healing.

Authors:  Danielle Dixon; Michael Edmonds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  The Anti-inflammatory and Proangiogenic Properties of High-Density Lipoproteins: An Emerging Role in Diabetic Wound Healing.

Authors:  Zahra Lotfollahi; Joseph Dawson; Robert Fitridge; Christina Bursill
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.947

9.  Comment on Löndahl. Number Eight in the Service of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing. Diabetes Care 2020;43:515-517.

Authors:  Robert G Frykberg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 19.112

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.