Literature DB >> 33479569

A Hierarchical Curve-Based Approach to the Analysis of Manifold Data.

Liberty Vittert1, Adrian W Bowman1, Stanislav Katina2.   

Abstract

One of the data structures generated by medical imaging technology is high resolution point clouds representing anatomical surfaces. Stereophotogrammetry and laser scanning are two widely available sources of this kind of data. A standardised surface representation is required to provide a meaningful correspondence across different images as a basis for statistical analysis. Point locations with anatomical definitions, referred to as landmarks, have been the traditional approach. Landmarks can also be taken as the starting point for more general surface representations, often using templates which are warped on to an observed surface by matching landmark positions and subsequent local adjustment of the surface. The aim of the present paper is to provide a new approach which places anatomical curves at the heart of the surface representation and its analysis. Curves provide intermediate structures which capture the principal features of the manifold (surface) of interest through its ridges and valleys. As landmarks are often available these are used as anchoring points, but surface curvature information is the principal guide in estimating the curve locations. The surface patches between these curves are relatively flat and can be represented in a standardised manner by appropriate surface transects to give a complete surface model. This new approach does not require the use of a template, reference sample or any external information to guide the method and, when compared with a surface based approach, the estimation of curves is shown to have improved performance. In addition, examples involving applications to mussel shells and human faces show that the analysis of curve information can deliver more targeted and effective insight than the use of full surface information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; curves; manifold; p-splines; shape analysis; smoothing; three dimensional

Year:  2019        PMID: 33479569      PMCID: PMC7116607          DOI: 10.1214/19-AOAS1267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  11 in total

1.  Parameter space warping: shape-based correspondence between morphologically different objects.

Authors:  Dominik Meier; Elizabeth Fisher
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Shape modelling using Markov random field restoration of point correspondences.

Authors:  Rasmus R Paulsen; Klaus B Hilger
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2003-07

3.  Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Peter Claes; Mark Walters; Mark D Shriver; David Puts; Greg Gibson; John Clement; Gareth Baynam; Geert Verbeke; Dirk Vandermeulen; Paul Suetens
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Male and female faces are only perceived categorically when linked to familiar identities--and when in doubt, he is a male.

Authors:  Regine Armann; Isabelle Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Crest lines for surface segmentation and flattening.

Authors:  Georgios Stylianou; Gerald Farin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.579

6.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape.

Authors:  F L Bookstein
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces?

Authors:  V Bruce; A M Burton; E Hanna; P Healey; O Mason; A Coombes; R Fright; A Linney
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  3D analysis of facial morphology.

Authors:  Peter Hammond; Tim J Hutton; Judith E Allanson; Linda E Campbell; Raoul C M Hennekam; Sean Holden; Michael A Patton; Adam Shaw; I Karen Temple; Matthew Trotter; Kieran C Murphy; Robin M Winter
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  The definitions of three-dimensional landmarks on the human face: an interdisciplinary view.

Authors:  Stanislav Katina; Kathryn McNeil; Ashraf Ayoub; Brendan Guilfoyle; Balvinder Khambay; Paul Siebert; Federico Sukno; Mario Rojas; Liberty Vittert; John Waddington; Paul F Whelan; Adrian W Bowman
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Ocean acidification and temperature increase impact mussel shell shape and thickness: problematic for protection?

Authors:  Susan C Fitzer; Liberty Vittert; Adrian Bowman; Nicholas A Kamenos; Vernon R Phoenix; Maggie Cusack
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.