Literature DB >> 33479487

Work productivity among Sjögren's Syndrome and non-Sjögren's dry eye patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gayathri K Sivakumar1, Janhavi Patel2, Monali S Malvankar-Mehta3,4, Rookaya Mather1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dry eye disease (DED) is one of the most common conditions presenting to eye care providers and is increasingly recognized to have poor outcomes on quality of life, activities of daily living, and social and emotional well-being. Here, we aim to understand the association between dry eye symptoms and workplace productivity experienced by patients with non-Sjögren's dry eye and Sjögren's Syndrome.
METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Healthstar, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to May 2019.
RESULTS: Thirty-one studies consisting of 50,446 study participants from 14 countries were included in this systematic review. Among non-Sjögren's dry eye patients, there was significant absenteeism (ES = 0.19; 95% CI: [0.04, 0.35]), presenteeism (ES = 0.25; 95% CI: [0.15. 0.35]), productivity impairment (ES = 0.24; 95% CI: [0.20, 0.27]), activity impairment (ES = 0.30; 95% CI: [0.21, 0.38]), and subjective difficulties at work (ES = 0.58; 95% CI: [0.40, 0.75]). Patients with Sjögren's Syndrome demonstrated significant absenteeism (ES = 0.13, 95% CI: [0.10, 0.17]), presenteeism (ES = 0.28, 95% CI: [0.24, 0.32]), productivity impairment (ES = 0.31, 95% CI: [0.27, 0.35]), and activity impairment (ES = 0.39, 95% CI: [0.32, 0.47]) in the workplace. In addition, patients with Sjögren's Syndrome demonstrated significantly lower employment rate (ES = 0.42, 95% CI: [0.34, 0.50]), decreased number of hours worked (SMD = -0.21, 95% CI: [-0.39, -0.02]), and increased work disability (ES = 0.18; 95% CI: [0.09, 0.27]).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate the negative association between DED and several work productivity measures.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33479487      PMCID: PMC8602278          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01282-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  45 in total

1.  Sex differences in clinical characteristics of dry eye disease.

Authors:  Jelle Vehof; Nicole Sillevis Smitt-Kamminga; Simone A Nibourg; Christopher J Hammond
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 2.  TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report.

Authors:  Fiona Stapleton; Monica Alves; Vatinee Y Bunya; Isabelle Jalbert; Kaevalin Lekhanont; Florence Malet; Kyung-Sun Na; Debra Schaumberg; Miki Uchino; Jelle Vehof; Eloy Viso; Susan Vitale; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Prevalence of Diagnosed Dry Eye Disease in the United States Among Adults Aged 18 Years and Older.

Authors:  Kimberly F Farrand; Moshe Fridman; Ipek Özer Stillman; Debra A Schaumberg
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Mechanisms of Visual Disturbance in Dry Eye.

Authors:  Shizuka Koh
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Prevalence of treated dry eye disease in a managed care population.

Authors:  C Yazdani; T McLaughlin; J E Smeeding; J Walt
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Dry eyes and video display terminals.

Authors:  K Tsubota; K Nakamori
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Utility assessment to measure the impact of dry eye disease.

Authors:  Patricia Buchholz; Carolyn S Steeds; Lee S Stern; Daniel P Wiederkehr; John J Doyle; Laura M Katz; Francisco C Figueiredo
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 8.  Computer vision syndrome: a review.

Authors:  Clayton Blehm; Seema Vishnu; Ashbala Khattak; Shrabanee Mitra; Richard W Yee
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 9.  New Perspectives on Dry Eye Definition and Diagnosis: A Consensus Report by the Asia Dry Eye Society.

Authors:  Kazuo Tsubota; Norihiko Yokoi; Jun Shimazaki; Hitoshi Watanabe; Murat Dogru; Masakazu Yamada; Shigeru Kinoshita; Hyo-Myung Kim; Hung-Won Tchah; Joon Young Hyon; Kyung-Chul Yoon; Kyoung Yul Seo; Xuguang Sun; Wei Chen; Lingyi Liang; Mingwu Li; Zuguo Liu
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Utility assessment among patients with dry eye disease.

Authors:  Rhett M Schiffman; John G Walt; Gordon Jacobsen; John J Doyle; Gary Lebovics; Walton Sumner
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.