| Literature DB >> 33479308 |
Christina J Thiele1, Malcolm D Hudson2, Andrea E Russell3, Marilin Saluveer2,4, Giovanna Sidaoui-Haddad2.
Abstract
Microplastics are contaminants of emerging concern; they are ingested by marine biota. About a quarter of global marine fish landings is used to produce fishmeal for animal and aquaculture feed. To provide a knowledge foundation for this matrix we reviewed the existing literature for studies of microplastics in fishmeal-relevant species. 55% of studies were deemed unsuitable due to focus on large microplastics (> 1 mm), lack of, or limited contamination control and polymer testing techniques. Overall, fishmeal-relevant species exhibit 0.72 microplastics/individual, with studies generally only assessing digestive organs. We validated a density separation method for effectiveness of microplastic extraction from this medium and assessed two commercial products for microplastics. Recovery rates of a range of dosed microplastics from whitefish fishmeal samples were 71.3 ± 1.2%. Commercial samples contained 123.9 ± 16.5 microplastics per kg of fishmeal-mainly polyethylene-including 52.0 ± 14.0 microfibres-mainly rayon. Concentrations in processed fishmeal seem higher than in captured fish, suggesting potential augmentation during the production process. Based on conservative estimates, over 300 million microplastic particles (mostly < 1 mm) could be released annually to the oceans through marine aquaculture alone. Fishmeal is both a source of microplastics to the environment, and directly exposes organisms for human consumption to these particles.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33479308 PMCID: PMC7820289 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81499-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379