Literature DB >> 30904637

Comparison of free and total 25-hydroxyvitamin D in normal human pregnancy.

Oleg Tsuprykov1, Claudia Buse2, Roman Skoblo1, Berthold Hocher3.   

Abstract

Vitamin D status correct monitoring during pregnancy is critically important for both maternal and fetal health. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) - a prohormone of a biologically active 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), despite the lack of biological activity, during the past decades has been routinely used as a main biomarker characterizing vitamin D status. About 85% of 25(OH)D in the bloodstream is bound to its specific carrier - vitamin D-binding protein (DBP), the remaining 15% are loosely bound to albumin, and only less than 0.1% are free in the circulation ("free 25(OH)D"). Total 25(OH)D is the sum of DBP-bound, albumin-bound and free 25(OH)D. According to a "free hormone hypothesis", only free 25(OH)D is able to induce a biological effect. Normal pregnancy is characterized by elevated serum DBP levels, and due to this fact the diagnostic strength of serum total 25(OH)D has been questioned. Free 25(OH)D might be a better characteristic of vitamin D status in this settings. We aimed to compare the diagnostic strength of a routine total 25(OH)D with directly measured free 25(OH)D in normal pregnancy by comparing the association strength between free and total 25(OH)D with biomarkers of bone health (PTH, calcium, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP)), lipid metabolism (adiponectin, LDL, HDL), kidney function (urea), endocrine parameters (T4, T3, TSH), and group B water-soluble vitamins. The study was conducted in 368 healthy white pregnant women - residents of north-east Germany. Free 25(OH)D showed an overall better associations with gestational age, markers of bone metabolism (calcium (rho = 0.141, p = 0.007 with free 25(OH)D; rho = 0.060, p = 0.251 with total 25(OH)D) and BSAP (rho = -0.203, p < 0.001 with free 25(OH)D; rho = -0.108, p = 0.038 with total 25(OH)D), lipid metabolism parameters (adiponectin (rho = 0.142, p = 0.008 with free 25(OH)D; rho = 0.054, p = 0.307 with total 25(OH)D), LDL cholesterol (rho = -0.191, p < 0.001 with free 25(OH)D; rho = 0.033, p = 0.539 with total 25(OH)D)) and a kidney function marker (urea (rho = 0.114, p = 0.032 with free 25(OH)D; rho = 0.008, p = 0.887 with total 25(OH)D)) than total 25(OH)D. In conclusion, the current study revealed that free 25(OH)D is a more precise determinant of the vitamin D status during normal human pregnancy than total 25(OH)D. In the settings of normal pregnancy, free 25(OH)D revealed better associations with markers of bone metabolism (calcium, BSAP), lipid metabolism (adiponectin, LDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL ratio) and kidney function (urea) than total 25(OH)D.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  25-Hydroxyvitamin D; Measured free 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Pregnancy; Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D; Vitamin D-binding protein

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30904637     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 0960-0760            Impact factor:   4.292


  9 in total

1.  Vitamin D status during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: A longitudinal study in a multiracial cohort.

Authors:  Jin Xia; Yiqing Song; Shristi Rawal; Jing Wu; Stefanie N Hinkle; Michael Y Tsai; Cuilin Zhang
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.577

Review 2.  Role of sex hormone-binding globulin in the free hormone hypothesis and the relevance of free testosterone in androgen physiology.

Authors:  L Antonio; D Vanderschueren; N Narinx; K David; J Walravens; P Vermeersch; F Claessens; T Fiers; B Lapauw
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 9.207

3.  Vitamin D in Follicular Fluid Correlates With the Euploid Status of Blastocysts in a Vitamin D Deficient Population.

Authors:  Ana Arnanz; Neelke De Munck; Ibrahim El Khatib; Aşina Bayram; Andrea Abdala; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Carol Coughlan; Alberto Pacheco; Juan A Garcia-Velasco; Human M Fatemi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Relationship Between Vitamin D and Hormones Important for Human Fertility in Reproductive-Aged Women.

Authors:  Chang Chu; Oleg Tsuprykov; Xin Chen; Saban Elitok; Bernhard K Krämer; Berthold Hocher
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Opposite correlation of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D- and 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D-metabolites with gestational age, bone- and lipid-biomarkers in pregnant women.

Authors:  Oleg Tsuprykov; Saban Elitok; Claudia Buse; Chang Chu; Bernhard Karl Krämer; Berthold Hocher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  C3-Epimer of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 as a Superior Marker for Predicting the Severity of Chronic Kidney Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

Authors:  Jie Tang; Binwu Ying; Yuwei Yang; Bei Xu; Lin Yu; Wenqiang Jiang; Shutao Pu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 7.310

7.  25(OH)VitD and human endocrine and functional fertility parameters in women undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Mei Tian; Suimin Zeng; Sufen Cai; Christoph Reichetzeder; Xiaoli Zhang; Chenjun Yin; Weihong Kuang; Kexin Cheng; Yao Jiang; Mingqiu Tao; Yuan Zeng; Ge Lin; Jian Li; Fei Gong; Berthold Hocher
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 6.055

8.  Towards harmonization of directly measured free 25-hydroxyvitamin D using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  Christopher T Sempos; Ernst Lindhout; Nicolas Heureux; Michel Hars; Damon A Parkington; Emily Dennison; Ramón Durazo-Arvizu; Kerry S Jones; Stephen A Wise
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.478

9.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in relation to lipids and clinical outcomes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Wenqing Chen; Yuan Li; Bo Gao; Jie Li; Mingming Zheng; Xiaotian Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.