Komal Adeel1, Nathan J Fergusson2,3, Risa Shorr4, Harold Atkins3,5,6, Kevin A Hay7,8,9. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2. Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada. 3. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 4. The Ottawa Hospital, Health Professions Education, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 6. Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 7. Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. kevin.hay@bccancer.bc.ca. 8. Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 West 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1 L3, Canada. kevin.hay@bccancer.bc.ca. 9. L/BMT Program of BC, Vancouver, BC, Canada. kevin.hay@bccancer.bc.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has had great success in treating patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies, with CD19-targeting therapies now approved in many countries. However, a subset of patients fails to respond or relapse after CD19 CAR T cell therapy, in part due to antigen loss, which has prompted the search for alternative antigen targets. CD22 is another antigen found on the surface of B cells. CARs targeting CD22 alone or in combination with other antigens have been investigated in several pre-clinical and clinical trials. Given the heterogeneity and small size of CAR T cell therapy clinical trials, systematic reviews are needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Here, we propose a systematic review of CAR T cell therapies targeting CD22, alone or in combination with other antigen targets, in B cell malignancies. METHODS: We will perform a systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Ongoing and completed clinical trials will be identified and cataloged. Interventional studies investigating CD22 CAR T cells, including various multi-antigen targeting approaches, in patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies will be eligible for inclusion. Only full-text articles, conference abstracts, letters, and case reports will be considered. Our primary outcome will be a complete response, defined as absence of detectable cancer. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events, overall response, minimal residual disease, and relapse, among others. Quality assessment will be performed using a modified Institute of Health Economics tool designed for interventional single-arm studies. We will report a narrative synthesis of clinical studies, presented in tabular format. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be performed using a random effects model to synthesize results. DISCUSSION: The results of the proposed review will help inform clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders of the risks and benefits of CD22 CAR T cell therapies. It will identify gaps or inconsistencies in outcome reporting and help to guide future clinical trials investigating CAR T cells. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193027.
BACKGROUND:Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has had great success in treating patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies, with CD19-targeting therapies now approved in many countries. However, a subset of patients fails to respond or relapse after CD19CAR T cell therapy, in part due to antigen loss, which has prompted the search for alternative antigen targets. CD22 is another antigen found on the surface of B cells. CARs targeting CD22 alone or in combination with other antigens have been investigated in several pre-clinical and clinical trials. Given the heterogeneity and small size of CAR T cell therapy clinical trials, systematic reviews are needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Here, we propose a systematic review of CAR T cell therapies targeting CD22, alone or in combination with other antigen targets, in B cell malignancies. METHODS: We will perform a systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Ongoing and completed clinical trials will be identified and cataloged. Interventional studies investigating CD22CAR T cells, including various multi-antigen targeting approaches, in patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies will be eligible for inclusion. Only full-text articles, conference abstracts, letters, and case reports will be considered. Our primary outcome will be a complete response, defined as absence of detectable cancer. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events, overall response, minimal residual disease, and relapse, among others. Quality assessment will be performed using a modified Institute of Health Economics tool designed for interventional single-arm studies. We will report a narrative synthesis of clinical studies, presented in tabular format. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be performed using a random effects model to synthesize results. DISCUSSION: The results of the proposed review will help inform clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders of the risks and benefits of CD22CAR T cell therapies. It will identify gaps or inconsistencies in outcome reporting and help to guide future clinical trials investigating CAR T cells. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193027.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adverse events; B cell malignancies; CAR T cell; CD22; Chimeric antigen receptor; Complete response; Efficacy; Safety
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-04-26
Authors: Emma J M Grigor; Dean Fergusson; Natasha Kekre; Joshua Montroy; Harold Atkins; Matthew D Seftel; Mads Daugaard; Justin Presseau; Kednapa Thavorn; Brian Hutton; Robert A Holt; Manoj M Lalu Journal: Transfus Med Rev Date: 2019-02-14
Authors: Marco Ruella; David M Barrett; Saad S Kenderian; Olga Shestova; Ted J Hofmann; Jessica Perazzelli; Michael Klichinsky; Vania Aikawa; Farzana Nazimuddin; Miroslaw Kozlowski; John Scholler; Simon F Lacey; Jan J Melenhorst; Jennifer J D Morrissette; David A Christian; Christopher A Hunter; Michael Kalos; David L Porter; Carl H June; Stephan A Grupp; Saar Gill Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Lawrence H Schwartz; Saskia Litière; Elisabeth de Vries; Robert Ford; Stephen Gwyther; Sumithra Mandrekar; Lalitha Shankar; Jan Bogaerts; Alice Chen; Janet Dancey; Wendy Hayes; F Stephen Hodi; Otto S Hoekstra; Erich P Huang; Nancy Lin; Yan Liu; Patrick Therasse; Jedd D Wolchok; Lesley Seymour Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Irbaz Bin Riaz; Umar Zahid; Muhammad Umar Kamal; Muhammad Husnain; Ali McBride; Anh Hua; Auon Abbas Hamadani; Laeth George; Ali Zeeshan; Qurat-Ul-Ain Riaz Sipra; Ammad Raina; Bushra Rahman; Soham Puvvada; Faiz Anwer Journal: Immunotherapy Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: Terry J Fry; Nirali N Shah; Rimas J Orentas; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Constance M Yuan; Sneha Ramakrishna; Pamela Wolters; Staci Martin; Cindy Delbrook; Bonnie Yates; Haneen Shalabi; Thomas J Fountaine; Jack F Shern; Robbie G Majzner; David F Stroncek; Marianna Sabatino; Yang Feng; Dimiter S Dimitrov; Ling Zhang; Sang Nguyen; Haiying Qin; Boro Dropulic; Daniel W Lee; Crystal L Mackall Journal: Nat Med Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 53.440