Terese Dehl1, Ulf Sauerbrey2,3, Adina Dreier-Wolfgramm1,4, Angela Nikelski5, Nino Chikhradze6, Armin Keller7, Jessica Laufer7, Fanny Schumacher-Schoenert7, Stefan Kreisel5, Jochen René Thyrian7, Wolfgang Hoffmann1,7, Horst Christian Vollmar8,9. 1. Institute of Community Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. 2. Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Germany. 3. Department of Social Work and Education, Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, Neubrandenburg, Germany. 4. Department for Nursing Care and Management, Faculty of Business & Social Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Berliner Tor 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany. 5. Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Bethesdaweg 12, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany. 6. Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine (AM RUB), Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum (RUB), Universitätsstr. 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany. 7. German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/ Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. 8. Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Germany. horst.vollmar@ruhr-uni-bochum.de. 9. Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine (AM RUB), Medical Faculty, Ruhr University Bochum (RUB), Universitätsstr. 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany. horst.vollmar@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the healthcare system in Germany, different institutions and actors play specific roles in the discharge and transition of patients from hospitals into primary care (Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen, Wettbewerb an der Schnittstelle zwischen ambulanter und stationärer Gesundheitsversorgung, 2012). However, there are shortcomings in these intersectoral transitions. Especially in older people with cognitive impairment (PCI), discharge management often lacks coordination and cooperation between healthcare providers. This frequently results in higher rates of unscheduled readmission. The project intersec-CM is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that aims to explore up to what extent an intersectoral care management (ICM) can improve this transition. This ICM is delivered by nurses with special training in care management. The objective of this paper is to describe a mixed-methods process evaluation of the intersectoral care management intervention and the factors that facilitate and inhibit its implementation. METHODS: Different study designs for process evaluations from previous literature were collected and analysed according to the dimension implementation fidelity, satisfaction with the intervention, feasible transfer into routine care, optimum point of time, frequency and execution of the intervention, and context factors. RESULTS: The actor-network theory was chosen as the theoretic framework for the process evaluation. Based on this theory, a mixed-methods design was developed to combine and integrate qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods. The qualitative part includes semi-structured interviews using topic guides (phase 1) and later in-depth interviews with narrative portions (phase 3), which will be analysed by using the qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz. The quantitative survey (phase 2) is conducted with standardised questionnaires. DISCUSSION: Challenges in data collection include the development of interview guidelines, which require different terminologies depending on every specific actor targeted in the intervention. Conducting the interviews, there is a risk of misunderstanding the older PCI by the interviewer and vice versa. However, the combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches as different techniques of process evaluation may help to capture, integrate and analyse data on different dimensions of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our process evaluation may serve as an implementation guideline for intersectoral care management in the German healthcare system. Furthermore, the approach to evaluate the process of a complex intervention in health care for older PCI may serve as a stimulus to broaden the evidence base also of other complex intervention studies to improve health care for this vulnerable group. The study was ethically approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald. The study has been registered at the U.S. National Library of Medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03359408 . Registered on 2 December 2017. The approximate date when recruitment to the process evaluation of the study will be completed is 31 May 2021.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In the healthcare system in Germany, different institutions and actors play specific roles in the discharge and transition of patients from hospitals into primary care (Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen, Wettbewerb an der Schnittstelle zwischen ambulanter und stationärer Gesundheitsversorgung, 2012). However, there are shortcomings in these intersectoral transitions. Especially in older people with cognitive impairment (PCI), discharge management often lacks coordination and cooperation between healthcare providers. This frequently results in higher rates of unscheduled readmission. The project intersec-CM is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that aims to explore up to what extent an intersectoral care management (ICM) can improve this transition. This ICM is delivered by nurses with special training in care management. The objective of this paper is to describe a mixed-methods process evaluation of the intersectoral care management intervention and the factors that facilitate and inhibit its implementation. METHODS: Different study designs for process evaluations from previous literature were collected and analysed according to the dimension implementation fidelity, satisfaction with the intervention, feasible transfer into routine care, optimum point of time, frequency and execution of the intervention, and context factors. RESULTS: The actor-network theory was chosen as the theoretic framework for the process evaluation. Based on this theory, a mixed-methods design was developed to combine and integrate qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods. The qualitative part includes semi-structured interviews using topic guides (phase 1) and later in-depth interviews with narrative portions (phase 3), which will be analysed by using the qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz. The quantitative survey (phase 2) is conducted with standardised questionnaires. DISCUSSION: Challenges in data collection include the development of interview guidelines, which require different terminologies depending on every specific actor targeted in the intervention. Conducting the interviews, there is a risk of misunderstanding the older PCI by the interviewer and vice versa. However, the combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches as different techniques of process evaluation may help to capture, integrate and analyse data on different dimensions of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our process evaluation may serve as an implementation guideline for intersectoral care management in the German healthcare system. Furthermore, the approach to evaluate the process of a complex intervention in health care for older PCI may serve as a stimulus to broaden the evidence base also of other complex intervention studies to improve health care for this vulnerable group. The study was ethically approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald. The study has been registered at the U.S. National Library of Medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03359408 . Registered on 2 December 2017. The approximate date when recruitment to the process evaluation of the study will be completed is 31 May 2021.
Entities:
Keywords:
Case management; Cognitive impairment; Complex intervention; Dementia; Hospital discharge; Implementation fidelity; Intersectoral care management; Process evaluation; Transition
Authors: Jochen René Thyrian; Johannes Hertel; Diana Wucherer; Tilly Eichler; Bernhard Michalowsky; Adina Dreier-Wolfgramm; Ina Zwingmann; Ingo Kilimann; Stefan Teipel; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Lawrence A Palinkas; Sarah M Horwitz; Carla A Green; Jennifer P Wisdom; Naihua Duan; Kimberly Hoagwood Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2015-09
Authors: Lori A Daiello; Rebekah Gardner; Gary Epstein-Lubow; Kristen Butterfield; Stefan Gravenstein Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Katja Seidel; Tina Quasdorf; Julia Haberstroh; Jochen René Thyrian Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.614