Literature DB >> 10768797

Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects.

T Baranowski1, G Stables.   

Abstract

Process evaluation is an important, but infrequently conducted, component of evaluating the impact of health promotion interventions. The process evaluation results from the nine 5-a-Day projects were overviewed. Process evaluation helped explain some of the weaker aspects of program performance, process indicators occasionally declined over time and varied by demographic characteristics, and some process measures were related to mediating variables and program outcomes. Future development of process evaluation must include further development of concepts, more consistent and thorough conduct of process evaluation, appropriate methodological work, and assessment of the relations among the process evaluation components and the program mediators and outcomes. Further development in this area promises refinement in understanding how and why interventions achieve their effects, how best to conduct intervention programs to maximize effects, and enhancement of the internal and external validity of the studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10768797     DOI: 10.1177/109019810002700202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  96 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing intervention fidelity: a means of strengthening study impact.

Authors:  Sharon Horner; Lynn Rew; Rosamar Torres
Journal:  J Spec Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.260

Review 2.  A glossary for evidence based public health.

Authors:  Lucie Rychetnik; Penelope Hawe; Elizabeth Waters; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Frommer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Process evaluation of the Pool Cool Diffusion Trial for skin cancer prevention across 2 years.

Authors:  Cam Escoffery; Karen Glanz; Tom Elliott
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2007-10-22

4.  An overview of "The Active by Choice Today" (ACT) trial for increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Dawn K Wilson; Heather Kitzman-Ulrich; Joel E Williams; Ruth Saunders; Sarah Griffin; Russell Pate; M Lee Van Horn; Alexandra Evans; Brent Hutto; Cheryl L Addy; Gary Mixon; Susan B Sisson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Secretos de la Buena Vida: processes of dietary change via a tailored nutrition communication intervention for Latinas.

Authors:  Barbara Baquero; Guadalupe X Ayala; Elva M Arredondo; Nadia R Campbell; Donald J Slymen; Linda Gallo; John P Elder
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-04-01

6.  Does the Kids Café Program's Nutrition Education Improve Children's Dietary Intake? A Pilot Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Jayna M Dave; Yan Liu; Tzu-An Chen; Deborah I Thompson; Karen W Cullen
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.045

7.  Using a systematic conceptual model for a process evaluation of a middle school obesity risk-reduction nutrition curriculum intervention: choice, control & change.

Authors:  Heewon Lee; Isobel R Contento; Pamela Koch
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.045

8.  A multi-method process evaluation for a skin cancer prevention diffusion trial.

Authors:  Cam Escoffery; Karen Glanz; Dawn Hall; Thomas Elliott
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Process evaluation of a Dutch community intervention to improve health related behaviour in deprived neighbourhoods.

Authors:  Gittte C Kloek; Frank J van Lenthe; Yvonne M G Meertens; Maria A Koelen; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2006

10.  Using process evaluation for program improvement in dose, fidelity and reach: the ACT trial experience.

Authors:  Dawn K Wilson; Sarah Griffin; Ruth P Saunders; Heather Kitzman-Ulrich; Duncan C Meyers; Leslie Mansard
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.