Literature DB >> 33477965

Implementation of the Canadian National Standards in Breast Cancer Surgical Care: Gaps, Barriers, Enablers and Opportunities.

Angel Arnaout1,2, Anubha Prashad1, Nadine Dunk1, Jess Rogers1, Christian Finley1,3, Annemarie Edwards1, Mary Argent-Katwala1.   

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis and surgical treatment decision making for breast cancers has become increasingly complex. Recently, Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) published pan-Canadian evidence-based surgical standards for the care of breast cancer patients. This study was undertaken to assess the degree to which these standards were currently met in practice and to further understand the determinants of their implementation nationally.
Methods: This study was undertaken in two parts-(1) National survey of breast cancer surgeons to assess the perceived extent of implementation of these standards in their institution and province; (2) Formation of a focus group with a representative sample of breast surgeons across Canada to further understand the barriers and facilitators towards future breast standards implementation.
Results: 35 surgeons participated in the survey: 66% were from community hospitals. There were four categories of standards that were the most significantly lacking across the country-(a) processes related to quality assurance, (b) turnaround time for pathology results (c) psychosocial and health-related support for the breast cancer patient and (d) breast reconstruction for patients undergoing mastectomy. The focus group included participants from all ten Canadian provinces. For each standard, the 134 determinants fell into three main categories-individual physician (n = 27, 20%); organizational (n = 46, 34%), and system (n = 61, 46%). While specific determinants were present for each category, surgical standards were more likely to be implemented in practice if (1) they aligned with organizational priorities standards; (2) the individual physicians or physician groups were accountable to the organization and/or cancer jurisdiction regarding compliance with the standard; and (3) if infrastructure or resources existed within the organization or system for the reliable collection of relevant, meaningful, practice changing data combined with the capability of benchmarking, peer-peer comparisons and timely feedback to the surgeons.
Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated variation, barriers and opportunities for the national implementation of CPAC's breast cancer surgery standards and identified determinants of high-quality breast surgical care delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barriers; breast; cancer; enablers; implementation; standards; surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 33477965      PMCID: PMC7903263          DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28010056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  8 in total

Review 1.  Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to Perform Clinical Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery.

Authors:  Samuel Eisenstein; Sarah Stringfield; Stefan D Holubar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-01-08

2.  Breast surgery outcomes as quality measures according to the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Dustin L Eck; Stephanie L Koonce; Ross F Goldberg; Sanjay Bagaria; Tammeza Gibson; Steven P Bowers; Sarah A McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  How different is cancer control across Canada? Comparing performance indicators for prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  R Rahal; J Chadder; K DeCaria; G Lockwood; H Bryant
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Directly Improving the Quality of Radiation Treatment Through Peer Review: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Cancer Centers Across a Provincial Cancer Program.

Authors:  Julie Rouette; Eric Gutierrez; Jennifer O'Donnell; Lindsay Reddeman; Margaret Hart; Sophie Foxcroft; Gunita Mitera; Padraig Warde; Michael D Brundage
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Rates of breast cancer surgery in Canada from 2007/08 to 2009/10: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Geoff Porter; Brandon Wagar; Heather Bryant; Maria Hewitt; Elaine Wai; Kelly Dabbs; Anne McFarlane; Rami Rahal
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-06-17

6.  How do the characteristics of breast cancer diagnostic assessment programmes influence service delivery: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  A R Gagliardi; G Honein-AbouHaidar; T Stuart-McEwan; J Smylie; A Arnaout; J Seely; F C Wright; M J Dobrow; M C Brouwers; K Bukhanov; D R McCready
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Disparities in breast cancer diagnosis for immigrant women in Ontario and BC: results from the CanIMPACT study.

Authors:  A K Lofters; M L McBride; D Li; M Whitehead; R Moineddin; L Jiang; E Grunfeld; P A Groome
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Patient Advocacy in Plastic Surgery: An Underutilized Tool.

Authors:  Cody L Mullens; Shelby L Nathan; Geoffrey M Kozak; John P Fischer; Gregory A Greco; Cristiane M Ueno
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.