Literature DB >> 28490927

How different is cancer control across Canada? Comparing performance indicators for prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

R Rahal1, J Chadder1, K DeCaria1, G Lockwood1, H Bryant1,2.   

Abstract

Meaningful performance measures are an important part of the toolkit for health system improvement. The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer has been reporting on pan-Canadian cancer system performance indicators since 2009-work that has led to the availability of standardized measures that can help to shed light on the extent of variation and opportunities for quality improvement across the country. Those measures include a core set of system indicators ranging from prevention and screening, through diagnosis and treatment, to survivorship and end-of-life care. Key indicators were calculated and graphed, showing the range from worst to best result for the provinces and territories included in the data. There were often significant differences in cancer system performance between provinces and territories. For example, smoking prevalence rates ranged from 14% to 62%. The 90th percentile wait times from an abnormal breast screen to resolution (without biopsy) ranged from 4 weeks to 8 weeks. The percentage of breast cancer resections that used breast-conserving surgery rather than mastectomy ranged from 38% to 75%. Clinical trial participation rates for adults ranged from 0.2% to 6.6%. Variations in performance indicators between Canadian jurisdictions suggest potential differences in the planning and delivery of cancer control services and in clinical practice patterns and patient outcomes. Understanding sources of variation can help to identify opportunities for improvements in the quality and outcomes of cancer control service delivery in each province and territory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Performance indicators

Year:  2017        PMID: 28490927      PMCID: PMC5407864          DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  4 in total

1.  The impact of the process of clinical research on health service outcomes.

Authors:  P Selby
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update.

Authors:  Paul Hewitson; Paul Glasziou; Eila Watson; Bernie Towler; Les Irwig
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  The relation between lymph node status and survival in Stage I-III colon cancer: results from a prospective nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  J Lykke; O Roikjaer; P Jess
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials.

Authors:  S Darby; P McGale; C Correa; C Taylor; R Arriagada; M Clarke; D Cutter; C Davies; M Ewertz; J Godwin; R Gray; L Pierce; T Whelan; Y Wang; R Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Survival advantage associated with metformin usage in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with diabetes mellitus receiving radical resection: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Cui-Song Luo; Yun Lin; Wei-Ping Zhou; Jun Shi
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  National Thoracic Surgery Standards Implementation: Barriers, Enablers, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Angel Arnaout; Anubha Prashad; Nadine Dunk; Jess Rogers; Annemarie Edwards; Mary Argent-Katwala; Christian Finley
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Implementation of the Canadian National Standards in Breast Cancer Surgical Care: Gaps, Barriers, Enablers and Opportunities.

Authors:  Angel Arnaout; Anubha Prashad; Nadine Dunk; Jess Rogers; Christian Finley; Annemarie Edwards; Mary Argent-Katwala
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Breast-Contour-Preserving Procedure as a Multidisciplinary Parameter of Esthetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Treatment in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Annnelotte van Bommel; Pauline Spronk; Marc Mureau; Sabine Siesling; Carolien Smorenburg; Rob Tollenaar; Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters; Thijs van Dalen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.