Literature DB >> 33477852

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Hip and Knee Replacement-Why and How It Should Be Implemented Following the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Thomas W Wainwright1,2.   

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a reduction in hip and knee replacement surgery across healthcare systems. When regular operating returns, there will be a large volume of patients and an emphasis on a short hospital stay. Patients will be keen to return home, and capacity will need to maximised. Strategies to reduce the associated risks of surgery and to accelerate recovery will be needed, and so Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) should be promoted as the model of care. ERAS protocols are proven to reduce hospital stay safely; however, ERAS pathways may require adaption to ensure both patient and staff safety. The risk of exposure to possible sources of COVID-19 should be limited, and so hospital visits should be minimised. The use of technology such as smartphone apps to provide pre-operative education, wearable activity trackers to assist with rehabilitation, and the use of telemedicine to complete outpatient appointments may be utilised. Also, units should be reminded that ERAS protocols are multi-modal, and every component is vital to minimise the surgical stress response. The focus should be on providing better and not just faster care. Units should learn from the past in order to expedite the implementation of or adaption of existing ERAS protocols. Strong leadership will be required, along with a supportive organisational culture, an inter-professional approach, and a recognised QI method should be used to contextualize improvement efforts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; enhanced recovery after surgery; hip replacement; knee replacement; outpatient surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33477852      PMCID: PMC7832821          DOI: 10.3390/medicina57010081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  16 in total

1.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Enhanced Recovery Pathways Using an Implementation Framework: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexander B. Stone; Christina T. Yuan; Michael A. Rosen; Michael C. Grant; Lauren E. Benishek; Elizabeth Hanahan; Lisa H. Lubomski; Clifford Ko; Elizabeth C. Wick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Beyond acute care: Why collaborative self-management should be an essential part of rehabilitation pathways for COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Thomas W Wainwright; Matthew Low
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Excellence in elective hip and knee surgery: what does it look like? A positive deviance approach.

Authors:  Lesley Hughes; Laura Sheard; Lisa Pinkney; Rebecca L Lawton
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2019-09-07

4.  Temporal trends in length of stay and readmissions after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pelle Baggesgaard Petersen; Christoffer Calov Jørgensen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.240

5.  A review of wearable motion tracking systems used in rehabilitation following hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  Shayan Bahadori; Tikki Immins; Thomas W Wainwright
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2018-06-18

6.  Staff experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Rachel Cohen; Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Association between same day discharge total knee and total hip arthroplasty and risks of cardiac/pulmonary complications and readmission: a population-based observational study.

Authors:  Jiabin Liu; Nabil Elkassabany; Jashvant Poeran; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle; David H Kim; Daniel Maalouf; Stavros Memtsoudis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Digital Orthopaedics: A Glimpse Into the Future in the Midst of a Pandemic.

Authors:  Stefano A Bini; Peter L Schilling; Shaun P Patel; Niraj V Kalore; Michael P Ast; Joseph D Maratt; Dustin J Schuett; Charles M Lawrie; Christopher C Chung; G Daxton Steele
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 9.  The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review.

Authors:  Emma Coles; Julie Anderson; Margaret Maxwell; Fiona M Harris; Nicola M Gray; Gill Milner; Stephen MacGillivray
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-26

10.  Resuming elective hip and knee arthroplasty after the first phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: the European Hip Society and European Knee Associates recommendations.

Authors:  N P Kort; E Gómez Barrena; M Bédard; S Donell; J-A Epinette; B Gomberg; M T Hirschmann; P Indelli; Ismail Khosravi; T Karachalios; M C Liebensteiner; B Stuyts; R Tandogan; B Violante; L Zagra; M Thaler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  3 in total

1.  Physiotherapy in an advanced rehabilitation pathway for patients after hip and knee arthroplasty: A proposal.

Authors:  Retha-Mari Prinsloo; Monique M Keller
Journal:  S Afr J Physiother       Date:  2021-09-28

2.  [Discharge readiness versus discharge-Results of the PROMISE study].

Authors:  Ulrich Betz; Michael Clarius; Manfred Krieger; Laura Langanki; Matthias Büttner; Sabine Fencel; Lukas Eckhard; Thomas Klonschinski; Philipp Drees
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 1.004

3.  First Polish mobile application for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Łukasz Pulik; Krzysztof Romaniuk; Nicola Dyrek; Nina Grabowska; Paweł Łęgosz
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2022-07-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.