Literature DB >> 33477828

Moving the Lab into the Mountains: A Pilot Study of Human Activity Recognition in Unstructured Environments.

Brian Russell1, Andrew McDaid2, William Toscano3, Patria Hume1.   

Abstract

GOAL: To develop and validate a field-based data collection and assessment method for human activity recognition in the mountains with variations in terrain and fatigue using a single accelerometer and a deep learning model.
METHODS: The protocol generated an unsupervised labelled dataset of various long-term field-based activities including run, walk, stand, lay and obstacle climb. Activity was voluntary so transitions could not be determined a priori. Terrain variations included slope, crossing rivers, obstacles and surfaces including road, gravel, clay, mud, long grass and rough track. Fatigue levels were modulated between rested to physical exhaustion. The dataset was used to train a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) capable of being deployed on battery powered devices. The human activity recognition results were compared to a lab-based dataset with 1,098,204 samples and six features, uniform smooth surfaces, non-fatigued supervised participants and activity labelling defined by the protocol.
RESULTS: The trail run dataset had 3,829,759 samples with five features. The repetitive activities and single instance activities required hyper parameter tuning to reach an overall accuracy 0.978 with a minimum class precision for the one-off activity (climbing gate) of 0.802.
CONCLUSION: The experimental results showed that the CNN deep learning model performed well with terrain and fatigue variations compared to the lab equivalents (accuracy 97.8% vs. 97.7% for trail vs. lab). SIGNIFICANCE: To the authors knowledge this study demonstrated the first successful human activity recognition (HAR) in a mountain environment. A robust and repeatable protocol was developed to generate a validated trail running dataset when there were no observers present and activity types changed on a voluntary basis across variations in terrain surface and both cognitive and physical fatigue levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerometer; artificial intelligence; biomechanics; convolutional neural network; deep learning; human activity recognition; inertial measurement unit; wearable sensor

Year:  2021        PMID: 33477828      PMCID: PMC7832872          DOI: 10.3390/s21020654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  20 in total

1.  Bioharness(™) multivariable monitoring device: part. I: validity.

Authors:  James A Johnstone; Paul A Ford; Gerwyn Hughes; Tim Watson; Andrew T Garrett
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Bioharness(™) Multivariable Monitoring Device: Part. II: Reliability.

Authors:  James A Johnstone; Paul A Ford; Gerwyn Hughes; Tim Watson; Andrew T Garrett
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Predicting Athlete Ground Reaction Forces and Moments From Spatio-Temporal Driven CNN Models.

Authors:  William Robert Johnson; Jacqueline Alderson; David Lloyd; Ajmal Mian
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Tracking Performance Changes With Running-Stride Variability When Athletes Are Functionally Overreached.

Authors:  Joel T Fuller; Clint R Bellenger; Dominic Thewlis; John Arnold; Rebecca L Thomson; Margarita D Tsiros; Eileen Y Robertson; Jonathan D Buckley
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.010

5.  Scoring the Stroop test.

Authors:  A R Jensen
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1965

6.  A Phase Variable Approach for IMU-Based Locomotion Activity Recognition.

Authors:  Harrison L Bartlett; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Reliability and diagnostic characteristics of clinical tests of upper limb motor function.

Authors:  M Amer; G Hubert; S J Sullivan; P Herbison; E A Franz; G D Hammond-Tooke
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Application of Raw Accelerometer Data and Machine-Learning Techniques to Characterize Human Movement Behavior: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Anantha Narayanan; Farzanah Desai; Tom Stewart; Scott Duncan; Lisa Mackay
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2020-03-01

9.  Comparison of Data Preprocessing Approaches for Applying Deep Learning to Human Activity Recognition in the Context of Industry 4.0.

Authors:  Xiaochen Zheng; Meiqing Wang; Joaquín Ordieres-Meré
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Recommended measures for the assessment of cognitive and physical performance in older patients with dementia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Willem J R Bossers; Lucas H V van der Woude; Froukje Boersma; Erik J A Scherder; Marieke J G van Heuvelen
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2012-12-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Human Activity Recognition of Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation in Free-Living Conditions: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Alexander Jamieson; Laura Murray; Lina Stankovic; Vladimir Stankovic; Arjan Buis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  A Survey of Human Gait-Based Artificial Intelligence Applications.

Authors:  Elsa J Harris; I-Hung Khoo; Emel Demircan
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-01-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.