The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) on behavior related to treatment of Polish adults aged ≥ 40 years. Methods: We conducted a computer-assisted telephone survey with a study sample stratified by age, sex, and place of residence (type, size, urban versus rural) reflecting the entire Polish population. Participants rated the frequency and symptom-specific bother of individual LUTS and their effects on seeking and receiving treatment, treatment satisfaction, and treatment continuation. We adjusted multiple logistic regression models to analyze the simultaneous effects of predictor variables on each dependent variable. Results: Overall, 6005 participants completed the interview. One third (29.6-33.5%) of participants with LUTS were seeking treatment, and 24.0-26.4% received treatment. There was no difference in treatment seeking and receiving between urban and rural areas. Whereas storage and voiding symptoms were significantly related to treatment seeking by both men and women, treatment receiving correlated only with voiding symptoms in men and only with storage symptoms in women. Most respondents who received treatment were satisfied; treatment dissatisfaction was related to the presence of storage symptoms in both men and women. Only 50% of all participants continued their treatment; discontinuation of treatment was statistically more prevalent for women than for men. Conclusion: This investigation, the first population-representative study performed in Eastern Europe, revealed a low frequency of seeking treatment for LUTS. In addition, symptoms that inclined participants to seek treatment might not have been adequately addressed by the treatment they received. We also found a relatively high rate of treatment discontinuation. Clearly, there is a need for both improved patient education about LUTS treatment and a need for increased clinician awareness of the coexistence of different symptoms in men and women plus proactive evaluation by physicians for all types of LUTS and associated bother.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) on behavior related to treatment of Polish adults aged ≥ 40 years. Methods: We conducted a computer-assisted telephone survey with a study sample stratified by age, sex, and place of residence (type, size, urban versus rural) reflecting the entire Polish population. Participants rated the frequency and symptom-specific bother of individual LUTS and their effects on seeking and receiving treatment, treatment satisfaction, and treatment continuation. We adjusted multiple logistic regression models to analyze the simultaneous effects of predictor variables on each dependent variable. Results: Overall, 6005 participants completed the interview. One third (29.6-33.5%) of participants with LUTS were seeking treatment, and 24.0-26.4% received treatment. There was no difference in treatment seeking and receiving between urban and rural areas. Whereas storage and voiding symptoms were significantly related to treatment seeking by both men and women, treatment receiving correlated only with voiding symptoms in men and only with storage symptoms in women. Most respondents who received treatment were satisfied; treatment dissatisfaction was related to the presence of storage symptoms in both men and women. Only 50% of all participants continued their treatment; discontinuation of treatment was statistically more prevalent for women than for men. Conclusion: This investigation, the first population-representative study performed in Eastern Europe, revealed a low frequency of seeking treatment for LUTS. In addition, symptoms that inclined participants to seek treatment might not have been adequately addressed by the treatment they received. We also found a relatively high rate of treatment discontinuation. Clearly, there is a need for both improved patient education about LUTS treatment and a need for increased clinician awareness of the coexistence of different symptoms in men and women plus proactive evaluation by physicians for all types of LUTS and associated bother.
Authors: Karin S Coyne; Teresa Zyczynski; Mary Kay Margolis; Victor Elinoff; Richard G Roberts Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: James W Griffith; Emily E Messersmith; Brenda W Gillespie; Jonathan B Wiseman; Kathryn E Flynn; Ziya Kirkali; John W Kusek; Tamara Bavendam; David Cella; Karl J Kreder; Jasmine J Nero; Maria E Corona; Catherine S Bradley; Kimberly S Kenton; Brian T Helfand; Robert M Merion; Kevin P Weinfurt Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Adrian S Wagg; Steve Foley; John Peters; Jameel Nazir; Leanne Kool-Houweling; Ludmila Scrine Journal: Int J Clin Pract Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Karin S Coyne; Chris C Sexton; Christine L Thompson; Ian Milsom; Debra Irwin; Zoe S Kopp; Christopher R Chapple; Steven Kaplan; Andrea Tubaro; Lalitha P Aiyer; Alan J Wein Journal: BJU Int Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Tomasz Golabek; Michal Skalski; Mikolaj Przydacz; Agata Świerkosz; Marcin Siwek; Katarzyna Golabek; Klaudia Stangel-Wojcikiewicz; Dominika Dudek; Piotr Chlosta Journal: Psychiatr Pol Date: 2016 Impact factor: 1.657
Authors: Mikołaj Przydacz; Marcin Chłosta; Łukasz Belch; Anna K Czech; Tomasz Wiatr; Katarzyna Gronostaj; Marek Lipinski; Piotr Chłosta Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2021-06-17