Literature DB >> 15528285

What prevents older people from seeking treatment for urinary incontinence? A qualitative exploration of barriers to the use of community continence services.

Sue Horrocks1, Maggie Somerset, Helen Stoddart, Tim J Peters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is a significant health problem for older people. Many people with incontinence do not seek services. Simple and effective treatments exist in primary care.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to explore reasons why older people living in the community do not present for help with problems of urinary incontinence and to identify ways in which they may be assisted to access continence services.
METHODS: In-depth interviews lasting an average of 1 h were conducted with 20 people aged over 65 years living in the community, purposively selected from a sample of patients who volunteered to be interviewed.
RESULTS: Older people described ageing as a natural, degenerative process and had reduced health expectations. Urinary incontinence was commonly viewed as an inevitable aspect of ageing and, as such, something to be accepted and managed independently. Shame and embarrassment combined with generational differences in attitudes to disclosure about personal matters also prevented people from seeking advice. Relatively successful strategies to manage incontinence enabled people to contain their symptoms, although this was at a social, psychological and, in some cases, health cost. Older people in this sample had considerable co-morbidity, in many cases resulting in mobility problems. Despite regular contact with primary care professionals, they had seldom disclosed their urinary incontinence.
CONCLUSION: A combination of personal attitudes and practical barriers prevent older people from seeking help for urinary incontinence. It is possible that older people would be more likely to seek help if asked specifically about urinary leakage by primary health care professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15528285     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmh622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  39 in total

1.  Barriers to seeking care for urinary incontinence in Mexican American women.

Authors:  Veronica T Mallett; Anna M Jezari; Thelma Carrillo; Sheralyn Sanchez; Zuber D Mulla
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Women with diabetes: understanding urinary incontinence and help seeking behavior.

Authors:  Ashmi M Doshi; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Michelle Y Morrill; Michael Schembri; David H Thom; Jeanette S Brown
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Activities of daily living in Greek cancer patients treated in a palliative care unit.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mystakidou; Eleni Tsilika; Efi Parpa; Efi Mitropoulou; Irene Panagiotou; Antonis Galanos; Athanasios Gouliamos
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Patient-Provider Discussions About Urinary Incontinence Among Older Women.

Authors:  Giulia I Lane; Kaitlin Hagan; Elisabeth Erekson; Vatche A Minassian; Francine Grodstein; Julie Bynum
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Reasons for non-disclosure of faecal incontinence: a comparison between two survey methods.

Authors:  L Bartlett; M Nowak; Y H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Incontinence in the elderly, 'normal' ageing, or unaddressed pathology?

Authors:  William Gibson; Adrian Wagg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  The puzzle of overactive bladder: controversies, inconsistencies, and insights.

Authors:  Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-06-27

8.  CUA guideline on adult overactive bladder.

Authors:  Jacques Corcos; Mikolaj Przydacz; Lysanne Campeau; Gary Gray; Duane Hickling; Christiane Honeine; Sidney B Radomski; Lynn Stothers; Adrian Wagg; Frcp Lond
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  A national benchmark for the initial assessment of men with LUTS: data from the 2010 Royal College of Physicians National Audit of Continence Care.

Authors:  W Gibson; D Harari; J Husk; D Lowe; A Wagg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Group versus individual sessions delivered by a physiotherapist for female urinary incontinence: an interview study with women attending group sessions nested within a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Frances Griffiths; Jo Pepper; Ellen C Jørstad-Stein; Jan Fereday Smith; Lesley Hill; Sarah Sallie E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.