Literature DB >> 33477514

The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses.

Jaume Pauné1, Silvia Fonts1, Lina Rodríguez2,3, Antonio Queirós3.   

Abstract

We compared the efficacy of controlling the annual increase in axial length (AL) in myopic Caucasian children based on two parameters: the back optic zone diameter (BOZD) of the orthokeratology (OK) lens and plus power ring diameter (PPRD) or mid-peripheral annular ring of corneal steepening. Data from 71 myopic patients (mean age, 13.34 ± 1.38 years; range, 10-15 years; 64% male) corrected with different BOZD OK lenses (DRL, Precilens) were collected retrospectively from a Spanish optometric clinic. The sample was divided into groups with BOZDs above or below 5.00 mm and the induced PPRD above or below 4.5 mm, and the relation to AL and refractive progression at 12 months was analyzed. Three subgroups were analyzed, i.e., plus power ring (PPR) inside, outside, or matching the pupil. The mean baseline myopia was -3.11 ± 1.46 D and the AL 24.65 ± 0.88 mm. Significant (p < 0.001) differences were found after 12 months of treatment in the refractive error and AL for the BOZD and PPRD. AL changes in subjects with smaller BOZDs decreased significantly regarding larger diameters (0.09 ± 0.12 and 0.15 ± 0.11 mm, respectively); in subjects with a horizontal sector of PPRD falling inside the pupil, the AL increased less (p = 0.035) than matching or outside the pupil groups by 0.04 ± 0.10 mm, 0.10 ± 0.11 mm, and 0.17 ± 0.12 mm, respectively. This means a 76% lesser AL growth or 0.13 mm/year in absolute reduction. OK corneal parameters can be modified by changing the OK lens designs, which affects myopia progression and AL elongation. Smaller BOZD induces a reduced PPRDs that slows AL elongation better than standard OK lenses. Further investigations should elucidate the effect of pupillary diameter, PPRD, and power change on myopia control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axial length; myopia progression; optic zone diameter; orthokeratology; pupillary diameter

Year:  2021        PMID: 33477514      PMCID: PMC7831104          DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  57 in total

1.  Comparison of ocular component growth curves among refractive error groups in children.

Authors:  Lisa A Jones; G Lynn Mitchell; Donald O Mutti; John R Hayes; Melvin L Moeschberger; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Influence of fogging lenses and cycloplegia on open-field automatic refraction.

Authors:  A Queirós; J González-Méijome; J Jorge
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  The myopia boom.

Authors:  Elie Dolgin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Repeatability of pupil size measurements with NIDEK OPD-Scan III in myopic children.

Authors:  Qi Tan; Alex Lk Ng; George Pm Cheng; Victor Cp Woo; Pauline Cho
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The Influence of Different OK Lens Designs on Peripheral Refraction.

Authors:  Pauline Kang; Helen Swarbrick
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  The Effect of Treatment Zone Decentration on Myopic Progression during Or-thokeratology.

Authors:  Ruru Chen; Yan Chen; Michael Lipson; Pauline Kang; Hengli Lian; Yune Zhao; Colm McAlinden; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.424

7.  Can manipulation of orthokeratology lens parameters modify peripheral refraction?

Authors:  Pauline Kang; Paul Gifford; Helen Swarbrick
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Variability of the ocular component measurements in children using A-scan ultrasonography.

Authors:  Daniel Kurtz; Ruth Manny; Mohamed Hussein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  Efficacy in myopia control.

Authors:  Noel A Brennan; Youssef M Toubouti; Xu Cheng; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 21.198

10.  Myopia Control with a Novel Peripheral Gradient Soft Lens and Orthokeratology: A 2-Year Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jaime Pauné; Hari Morales; Jesús Armengol; Lluisa Quevedo; Miguel Faria-Ribeiro; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  8 in total

1.  Weighted Zernike defocus coefficient of treatment zone is a meaningful indicator for myopia control efficacy of Ortho-K lenses.

Authors:  Yuzhuo Fan; Yan Li; Kai Wang; Jia Qu; Mingwei Zhao
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  Axial length shortening after orthokeratology and its relationship with myopic control.

Authors:  Chenhao Yang; Li Shen; Anken Wang; Jiaying Wang; Zhehuan Zhang; Weiming Yang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Factors associated with faster axial elongation after orthokeratology treatment.

Authors:  Ya Qi; Lizhou Liu; Yu Li; Fengju Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Change in Corneal Power Distribution in Orthokeratology: A Predictor for the Change in Axial Length.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Zhi Chen; Zhuoyi Chen; Jiaqi Zhou; Li Zeng; Feng Xue; Xiaomei Qu; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Comparison of Two Main Orthokeratology Lens Designs in Efficacy and Safety for Myopia Control.

Authors:  Weiwei Lu; Rui Ning; Kai Diao; Yang Ding; Ruru Chen; Lei Zhou; Yan Lian; Colm McAlinden; Francis W B Sanders; Fangfang Xia; Jinhai Huang; Wanqing Jin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-01

6.  The treatment zone decentration and corneal refractive profile changes in children undergoing orthokeratology treatment.

Authors:  Weiping Lin; Tianpu Gu; Hua Bi; Bei Du; Bin Zhang; Ruihua Wei
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Visual acuity, near phoria and accommodation in myopic children using spectacle lenses with aspherical lenslets: results from a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Yingying Huang; Xue Li; Chu Wang; Fengchao Zhou; Adeline Yang; Hao Chen; Jinhua Bao
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-01

8.  The Spatial Distribution of Relative Corneal Refractive Power Shift and Axial Growth in Myopic Children: Orthokeratology Versus Multifocal Contact Lens.

Authors:  Fan Jiang; Xiaopeng Huang; Houxue Xia; Bingqi Wang; Fan Lu; Bin Zhang; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.