Literature DB >> 15980217

Comparison of ocular component growth curves among refractive error groups in children.

Lisa A Jones1, G Lynn Mitchell, Donald O Mutti, John R Hayes, Melvin L Moeschberger, Karla Zadnik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare ocular component growth curves among four refractive error groups in children. methods Cycloplegic refractive error was categorized into four groups: persistent emmetropia between -0.25 and +1.00 D (exclusive) in both the vertical and horizontal meridians on all study visits (n = 194); myopia of at least -0.75 D in both meridians on at least one visit (n = 247); persistent hyperopia of at least +1.00 D in both meridians on all visits (n = 43); and emmetropizing hyperopia of at least +1.00 D in both meridians on at least the first but not at all visits (n = 253). Subjects were seen for three visits or more between the ages of 6 and 14 years. Growth curves were modeled for the persistent emmetropes to describe the relation between age and the ocular components and were applied to the other three refractive error groups to determine significant differences. results At baseline, eyes of myopes and persistent emmetropes differed in vitreous chamber depth, anterior chamber depth, axial length, and corneal power and produced growth curves that showed differences in the same ocular components. Persistent hyperopes were significantly different from persistent emmetropes in most components at baseline, whereas growth curve shapes were not significantly different, with the exception of anterior chamber depth (slower growth in persistent hyperopes compared with emmetropes) and axial length (lesser annual growth per year in persistent hyperopes compared with emmetropes). The growth curve shape for corneal power was different between the emmetropizing hyperopes and persistent emmetropes (increasing corneal power compared with decreasing power in emmetropes). conclusions Comparisons of growth curves between persistent emmetropes and three other refractive error groups showed that there are many similarities in the growth patterns for both the emmetropizing and persistent hyperopes, whereas the differences in growth lie mainly between the emmetropes and myopes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15980217     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  50 in total

1.  Calculation of crystalline lens power using a modification of the Bennett method.

Authors:  Victor M Hernandez; Florence Cabot; Marco Ruggeri; Carolina de Freitas; Arthur Ho; Sonia Yoo; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Optical power of the isolated human crystalline lens.

Authors:  David Borja; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho; Noel Ziebarth; Alexandre M Rosen; Rakhi Jain; Adriana Amelinckx; Esdras Arrieta; Robert C Augusteyn; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Effect of pathological myopia on biomechanical properties: a study by ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  Veysi Öner; Mehmet Taş; Erdal Özkaya; Yavuz Oruç
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Associations between hyperopia and other vision and refractive error characteristics.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Gui-Shuang Ying; Jiayan Huang; Maureen Maguire; Graham Quinn; Elise B Ciner; Lynn A Cyert; Deborah A Orel-Bixler; Bruce D Moore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Morphological changes of human crystalline lens in myopia.

Authors:  Geethika Muralidharan; Eduardo Martínez-Enríquez; Judith Birkenfeld; Miriam Velasco-Ocana; Pablo Pérez-Merino; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Interocular difference associated with myopic progression following unilateral lateral rectus recession in early school-aged children.

Authors:  Yooyeon Park; Ye Jin Ahn; Shin Hae Park; Sun Young Shin
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Objectively Measured Light Exposure During School and Summer in Children.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Auzita Sajjadi; Julia S Benoit
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Does anisometropia affect the ciliary muscle thickness? An ultrasound biomicroscopy study.

Authors:  Selim Cevher; Tayfun Şahin
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Emmetropization, visual acuity, and strabismus outcomes among hyperopic infants followed with partial hyperopic corrections given in accordance with dynamic retinoscopy.

Authors:  D Somer; E Karabulut; F G Cinar; U E Altiparmak; N Unlu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Systemic 7-methylxanthine in retarding axial eye growth and myopia progression: a 36-month pilot study.

Authors:  Klaus Trier; Søren Munk Ribel-Madsen; Dongmei Cui; Søren Brøgger Christensen
Journal:  J Ocul Biol Dis Infor       Date:  2008-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.