Literature DB >> 33475519

Effects of Objective and Subjective Health Literacy on Patients' Accurate Judgment of Health Information and Decision-Making Ability: Survey Study.

Peter Johannes Schulz1, Annalisa Pessina1, Uwe Hartung2, Serena Petrocchi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interpreting health information and acquiring health knowledge have become more important with the accumulation of scientific medical knowledge and ideals of patient autonomy. Health literacy and its tremendous success as a concept can be considered an admission that not all is well in the distribution of health knowledge. The internet makes health information much more easily accessible than ever, but it introduces its own problems, of which health disinformation is a major one.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether objective and subjective health literacy are independent concepts and to test which of the two was associated more strongly with accurate judgments of the quality of a medical website and with behavioral intentions beneficial to health.
METHODS: A survey on depression and its treatments was conducted online (n=362). The Newest Vital Sign was employed to measure objective, performance-based health literacy, and the eHealth Literacy Scale was used to measure subjective, perception-based health literacy. Correlations, comparisons of means, linear and binary logistic regression, and mediation models were used to determine the associations.
RESULTS: Objective and subjective health literacy were weakly associated with one another (r=0.06, P=.24). High objective health literacy levels were associated with an inclination to behave in ways that are beneficial to one's own or others' health (Exp[B]=2.068, P=.004) and an ability to recognize low-quality online sources of health information (β=-.4698, P=.005). The recognition also improved participants' choice of treatment (β=-.3345, P<.001). Objective health literacy helped people to recognize misinformation on health websites and improved their judgment on their treatment for depression.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported, perception-based health literacy should be treated as a separate concept from objective, performance-based health literacy. Only objective health literacy appears to have the potential to prevent people from becoming victims of health disinformation. ©Peter Johannes Schulz, Annalisa Pessina, Uwe Hartung, Serena Petrocchi. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.01.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Newest Vital Sign; depression; eHealth Literacy Scale; health literacy; mental health; objective health literacy; perception-based health literacy; performance-based; self-reported health literacy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33475519      PMCID: PMC7861996          DOI: 10.2196/20457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


  42 in total

1.  The evolving field of health literacy research.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Elizabeth A H Wilson; Lauren McCormack
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

2.  The first italian validation of the most widespread health literacy assessment tool: the Newest Vital Sign.

Authors:  Leonardo Capecchi; Andrea Guazzini; Chiara Lorini; Francesca Santomauro; Guglielmo Bonaccorsi
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.901

3.  HIV-AIDS patients' evaluation of health information on the internet: the digital divide and vulnerability to fraudulent claims.

Authors:  Eric G Benotsch; Seth Kalichman; Lance S Weinhardt
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-12

4.  The evolving concept of health literacy.

Authors:  Don Nutbeam
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Associations among health literacy, diabetes knowledge, and self-management behavior in adults with diabetes: results of a dutch cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Iris van der Heide; Ellen Uiters; Jany Rademakers; Jeroen N Struijs; A Jantine Schuit; Caroline A Baan
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014

6.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.

Authors:  D Charnock; S Shepperd; G Needham; R Gann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; G Samsa; B K Rimer
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Validity of Three Brief Health Literacy Screeners to Measure Functional Health Literacy - Evidence from Five Different Countries.

Authors:  Sarah Mantwill; Ahmed Allam; Anne-Linda Camerini; Peter J Schulz
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-01-10

9.  How Adolescents Search for and Appraise Online Health Information: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaimie L Freeman; Patrina H Y Caldwell; Patricia A Bennett; Karen M Scott
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 10.  eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World.

Authors:  Cameron D Norman; Harvey A Skinner
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  8 in total

1.  An Integrated Framework to Conceptualize and Develop the Vancouver Airways Health Literacy Tool (VAHLT).

Authors:  Iraj Poureslami; Jacek Kopec; Noah Tregobov; Jessica Shum; Rick Sawatzky; Richard Hohn; J Mark FitzGerald
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Exploring the Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior in a Sample of Italian Women: The "SEI Donna" Study.

Authors:  Loredana Covolo; Miriam Guana; Guglielmo Bonaccorsi; Laura Brunelli; Silvana Castaldi; Antonella De Donno; Alessandra Mereu; Marco Verani; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  A Breast Cancer Smartphone App to Navigate the Breast Cancer Journey: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Serena Petrocchi; Chiara Filipponi; Giacomo Montagna; Marta Bonollo; Olivia Pagani; Francesco Meani
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-05-10

4.  Double burden of COVID-19 knowledge deficit: low health literacy and high information avoidance.

Authors:  Xuewei Chen; Ming Li; Gary L Kreps
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-02-05

5.  Digitization and Health in Germany: Cross-sectional Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Karina Karolina De Santis; Tina Jahnel; Elida Sina; Julian Wienert; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2021-11-22

6.  Psychological Determinants of Men's Adherence to Cascade Screening for BRCA1/2.

Authors:  Giulia Ongaro; Serena Petrocchi; Mariarosaria Calvello; Bernardo Bonanni; Irene Feroce; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.109

7.  Digital Health Literacy: Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Keng Yang; Yekang Hu; Hanying Qi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 8.  Health Literacy in Health Professionals Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Grepmeier; Maja Pawellek; Janina Curbach; Julia von Sommoggy; Karl Philipp Drewitz; Claudia Hasenpusch; Eva Maria Bitzer; Christian Apfelbacher; Uwe Matterne
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2022-10-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.