| Literature DB >> 33473164 |
Min Yuen Teo1, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie2, Kenneth Seier3, Christopher Tully4, Ashley M Regazzi5, Eugene Pietzak6, David B Solit7, Satish Tickoo2, Victor Reuter2, Eugene K Cha6, Harry Herr6, Timothy Donahue6, Sherri M Donat6, Guido Dalbagni6, Bernard H Bochner6, Samuel Funt5, Gopakumar V Iyer5,7, Dean F Bajorin5,8, Irina Ostrovnaya3, Jonathan E Rosenberg5,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma (PUC) is a rare, aggressive histologic variant of urothelial cancer characterised by a diffuse growth pattern and CDH1 mutation. We studied the efficacy of preoperative platinum-based chemotherapy in nonmetastatic PUC and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced PUC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33473164 PMCID: PMC8007750 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01244-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 9.075
Fig. 1Consort diagram depicting the study population and subgroups for the primary clinical analysis.
PUC plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma.
Patient and clinical characteristics for plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma not otherwise specified cohorts.
| All PUC | Up-front surgery PUC | NAC PUC | LA PUC | UC NOS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| Age | |||||
| Median (range) | 65 (22–84) | 50 (43–84) | 59 (43–76) | 64 (22–84) | 65 (39–82) |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 53 (65) | 19 (66) | 25 (76) | 8 (44) | 101 (46) |
| Female | 28 (35) | 10 (35) | 8 (24) | 10 (56) | 45 (31) |
| Clinical T stage | |||||
| T2 | 57 (70) | 28 (97) | 23 (70) | 5 (27.8) | 67 (45.9) |
| T3–4 | 24 (30) | 1 (3) | 10 (30) | 13 (72.2) | 79 (54.1) |
| Clinical N stage | |||||
| Negative | 73 (90) | 29 (100) | 33 (100) | 8 (44.4) | 146 (100) |
| Positive | 8 (10) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 10 (55.6) | 0 (0) |
| EUA findings | |||||
| Normal | 50 (62) | 14 (48) | 30 (91) | 6 (33) | N/A |
| LA/invasive | 12 (15) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 11 (61) | N/A |
| ND/NP | 19 (24) | 15 (52) | 3 (9) | 1 (6) | N/A |
| Preoperative chemotherapy | |||||
| Yes | 51(63) | 0 (0) | 33 (100) | 18 (100) | 146 (100) |
| No | 30 (37) | 29 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Platinum type | |||||
| Cisplatin based | 46 (90) | N/A | 33 (100) | 13 (72) | 146 (100) |
| Carboplatin based | 5 (10) | N/A | 0 (0) | 5 (28) | 0 (0) |
| Duration of systemic therapy | |||||
| 4 cycles | 29 (57) | N/A | 27 (82) | 2 (11) | 146 (100) |
| >4 cycles | 22 (43) | N/A | 6 (18) | 16 (89) | 0 (0) |
The patient and clinical characteristics of the patients in the study are shown. Values represent frequency (percentage) unless specified otherwise.
PUC plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, LA locally advanced, UC NOS urothelial carcinoma not otherwise specified, EUA examination under anaesthesia, N/A not applicable, ND/NP not documented/not performed.
Pathologic staging of patients with clinically localised plasmacytoid carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or surgery first.
| Neoadjuvant | Surgery first | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Pathologic T stage | |||
| <pT2 | 7 (21) | 2 (7) | 0.048 |
| pT2–4 | 26 (79) | 27 (93) | |
| Pathologic N stage | |||
| Node negative | 19 (58) | 18 (62) | 0.018 |
| Node positive | 7 (21) | 11 (38) | |
| Not available | 7 (21) | 0 (0) | |
| AJCC staging | |||
| 0–I | 7 (21) | 2 (7) | 0.155 |
| II–IV | 26 (79) | 27 (93) | |
Values represent frequency (percentage).
AJCC American Joint Committee on Cancer.
Fig. 2Recurrence-free and overall survival is reduced in plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma.
Recurrence-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) of patients with plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and urothelial carcinoma, not otherwise specified (UC NOS) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Survival is compared between responders (those with pathologic complete response, defined as
Fig. 3Genomic characterisation of plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma.
Oncoprint of 33 plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma cases. Left, the prevalence of alterations in genes commonly altered in urothelial carcinoma, not otherwise specified, per The Cancer Genome Atlas analysis. Right, the prevalence of alterations in selected DNA damage response genes.