Literature DB >> 33472692

Multivariate prediction of mixed, multilevel, sequential outcomes arising from in vitro fertilisation.

Jack Wilkinson1, Andy Vail2, Stephen A Roberts2.   

Abstract

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) comprises a sequence of interventions concerned with the creation and culture of embryos which are then transferred to the patient's uterus. While the clinically important endpoint is birth, the responses to each stage of treatment contain additional information about the reasons for success or failure. As such, the ability to predict not only the overall outcome of the cycle, but also the stage-specific responses, can be useful. This could be done by developing separate models for each response variable, but recent work has suggested that it may be advantageous to use a multivariate approach to model all outcomes simultaneously. Here, joint analysis of the sequential responses is complicated by mixed outcome types defined at two levels (patient and embryo). A further consideration is whether and how to incorporate information about the response at each stage in models for subsequent stages. We develop a case study using routinely collected data from a large reproductive medicine unit in order to investigate the feasibility and potential utility of multivariate prediction in IVF. We consider two possible scenarios. In the first, stage-specific responses are to be predicted prior to treatment commencement. In the second, responses are predicted dynamically, using the outcomes of previous stages as predictors. In both scenarios, we fail to observe benefits of joint modelling approaches compared to fitting separate regression models for each response variable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro fertilisation; Joint modelling; Multistage treatment data; Multivariate responses; Sequential prediction; mixed data

Year:  2021        PMID: 33472692      PMCID: PMC7818923          DOI: 10.1186/s41512-020-00091-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Progn Res        ISSN: 2397-7523


  29 in total

1.  Discriminant analysis using a multivariate linear mixed model with a normal mixture in the random effects distribution.

Authors:  Arnošt Komárek; Bettina E Hansen; Edith M M Kuiper; Henk R van Buuren; Emmanuel Lesaffre
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Joint analysis of repeatedly observed continuous and ordinal measures of disease severity.

Authors:  R V Gueorguieva; G Sanacora
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Models for assisted conception data with embryo-specific covariates.

Authors:  Stephen A Roberts
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Clinical prediction models to predict the risk of multiple binary outcomes: a comparison of approaches.

Authors:  Glen P Martin; Matthew Sperrin; Kym I E Snell; Iain Buchan; Richard D Riley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Choosing Estimands in Clinical Trials: Putting the ICH E9(R1) Into Practice.

Authors:  Bohdana Ratitch; James Bell; Craig Mallinckrodt; Jonathan W Bartlett; Niti Goel; Geert Molenberghs; Michael O'Kelly; Pritibha Singh; Ilya Lipkovich
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 1.778

6.  Analysis of in vitro fertilization data with multiple outcomes using discrete time-to-event analysis.

Authors:  Arnab Maity; Paige L Williams; Louise Ryan; Stacey A Missmer; Brent A Coull; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  The predicted probability of live birth in In Vitro Fertilization varies during important stages throughout the treatment: analysis of 114,882 first cycles.

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Martina Capuzzo; Valeria Donno; Mario Mignini Renzini; Cinzia Del Giovane; Roberto D'Amico; Sesh Kamal Sunkara
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-08-01

8.  A Bayesian approach for joint modeling of cluster size and subunit-specific outcomes.

Authors:  David B Dunson; Zhen Chen; Jean Harry
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The next step to improving outcomes of IVF: consider the whole treatment.

Authors:  E M E W Heijnen; N S Macklon; B C J M Fauser
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Cumulative live birth rates after one or more complete cycles of IVF: a population-based study of linked cycle data from 178,898 women.

Authors:  David J McLernon; Abha Maheshwari; Amanda J Lee; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adaptive data-driven models to best predict the likelihood of live birth as the IVF cycle moves on and for each embryo transfer.

Authors:  Véronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Julie Roset; Pierre Di Pizio; Thomas Fréour; Paul Barrière; Jean Luc Pouly; Michael Grynberg; Isabelle Parneix; Catherine Avril; Joe Pacheco; Tomasz M Grzegorczyk
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.