| Literature DB >> 33472492 |
Yu-Bin Ji1,2, Fu-Ling Wang1,2.
Abstract
The trypsin-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from Allium cepa L. was optimized using the response surface methodology (RSM). The optimum extraction conditions were extraction temperature, extraction time, extraction pH, and enzyme amount of 37.16°C, 180 min, 8.57, and 5.16%, respectively. Under the optimized conditions, the yield of A. cepa L. polysaccharides (ACP) reached 9.69%, which was comparable with the predicted yield (9.73%). Mid- and high-dose ACP significantly inhibited the tumor growth (43.93%) and the tumor inhibition percentage (38.05%), which were more than 30%. The ACP could extend the survival time of H22 ascites tumor-bearing mice. Furthermore, the ACP could reduce the thymus and the spleen atrophy and significantly promoted the Con A-induced proliferation of splenocytes and elevated the serum IFN-γ and IL-2 levels. Therefore, the ACP could inhibit the tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice and regulated the immune function of mice. Practical ApplicationsThe trypsin-assisted extraction has high efficiency, is carried out through the polysaccharide extraction and the deproteinization at the same time, and is more convenient and fast than traditional methods. No detailed study on the optimization of the trypsin extraction of onion polysaccharides is available. Thus, this experiment aims to use the BBD (4 factors and 3 levels) to optimize the roles of extraction temperature, extraction time, extraction pH, and amount of enzyme on the yield of polysaccharides obtained from the fruit of A. cepa L. In addition, when looking for high-quality biological functional principles for the pharmaceutical industry, the antitumor activity of ACP was evaluated. A. cepa L. is one of the most widely cultivated and consumed crops worldwide. Polysaccharides are the main active ingredient, and studies have shown that a high intake of Allium vegetables is associated with reduced risk of cancers.Entities:
Keywords: Polysaccharides of Allium cepa L.; anti-tumor activity; box-Behnken design; immunomodulation; trypsin-assisted extraction
Year: 2021 PMID: 33472492 PMCID: PMC8291826 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1870320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Experimental design matrix with predicted and observed values
| Independent Symbol Variables | Level of Factors | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | |||||
| 34 | 36 | 38 | |||||
| No. of test | Yield (%) | ||||||
| Experimental | Predicted | ||||||
| 1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 6.20 | 6.35 | |
| 2 | −1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 5.56 | 5.23 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.85 | 7.96 | |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.68 | 8.62 | |
| 5 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 6.75 | 6.54 | |
| 6 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 7.96 | 8.10 | |
| 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9.21 | 9.32 | |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 7.21 | 7.28 | |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 7.79 | 7.70 | |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.38 | 8.62 | |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.72 | 8.62 | |
| 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 7.03 | 7.34 | |
| 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8.74 | 8.71 | |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.75 | 8.62 | |
| 15 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 6.29 | 6.34 | |
| 16 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 6.92 | 6.72 | |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.56 | 8.62 | |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9.07 | 8.71 | |
| 19 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6.96 | 7.05 | |
| 20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9.26 | 9.20 | |
| 21 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.05 | 6.95 | |
| 22 | 1 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 6.72 | 6.80 | |
| 23 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 5.58 | 6.05 | |
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7.23 | 7.47 | |
| 25 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6.47 | 6.30 | |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 5.92 | 5.80 | |
| 27 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 7.11 | 7.13 | |
| 28 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 8.53 | 8.30 | |
| 29 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 6.74 | 6.83 | |
Figure 1.Role of extraction temperature, extraction time, pH, and amount of enzyme on the yield of Allium cepa L. polysaccharide: (a) extraction time, 150 min; pH, 8.4; amount of enzyme, 5%; (b) extraction temperature, 36°C; pH, 8.4; amount of enzyme, 5%; (c) extraction temperature, 36°C; extraction time, 150 min; amount of enzyme, 5%; and (d) extraction temperature, 36°C; extraction time, 150 min; pH, 8.4
Analysis of variance for the quadratic equations of the yield
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 34.11 | 14 | 2.44 | 33.97 | <0.0001 | significant |
| 5.63 | 1 | 5.63 | 78.50 | <0.0001 | ||
| 6.69 | 1 | 6.69 | 93.27 | <0.0001 | ||
| 4.99 | 1 | 4.99 | 69.60 | <0.0001 | ||
| 2.25 | 1 | 2.25 | 31.42 | <0.0001 | ||
| 0.77 | 1 | 0.77 | 10.80 | 0.0054 | ||
| 0.084 | 1 | 0.084 | 1.17 | 0.2972 | ||
| 0.040 | 1 | 0.040 | 0.56 | 0.4676 | ||
| 0.070 | 1 | 0.070 | 0.98 | 0.3392 | ||
| 0.25 | 1 | 0.25 | 3.42 | 0.0858 | ||
| 0.38 | 1 | 0.38 | 5.27 | 0.0376 | ||
| 7.29 | 1 | 7.29 | 101.66 | <0.0001 | ||
| 0.34 | 1 | 0.34 | 4.79 | 0.0460 | ||
| 0.68 | 1 | 0.68 | 9.42 | 0.0083 | ||
| 8.00 | 1 | 8.00 | 111.47 | <0.0001 | ||
| Residual | 1.00 | 14 | 0.072 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 0.91 | 10 | 0.091 | 3.98 | 0.0976 | not significant |
| Pure Error | 0.092 | 4 | 0.023 | |||
| Cor Total | 35.11 | 28 | ||||
| 0.9714 | ||||||
| Adj | 0.9428 |
Figure 2.Response surface plots (3-D) and contour plots (2-D) of extraction temperature, extraction time, extraction pH, and amount of enzyme on the yield of ACP
Inhibitory effect of the ACP on the solid S180 tumor in mice
| Group | Dose (mg/(kg·d)) | Tumor weight (g) | Tumor inhibition percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | – | 1.0572 ±0.0789 | – |
| APS | 100 | 0.4738 ±0.0331** | 55.18 |
| ACP-Low | 50 | 0.7953 ±0.0428** | 24.77 |
| ACP-Mid | 100 | 0.5928 ±0.0367** | 43.93 |
| ACP-High | 200 | 0.6549 ±0.0551** | 38.05 |
Compared with control group, **p <0.01. Date were expressed as means ± SD (n = 10).
Influence of the ACP on the survival time of mice with tumor H22.
| Group | Dose (mg/(kg·d)) | Survival time (d) | Lifeprolong rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | – | 10.67 ±1.528 | – |
| APS | 100 | 17.67 ±2.082** | 65.60 |
| ACP-Low | 50 | 13.33 ±1.155 | 24.93 |
| ACP-Mid | 100 | 14.00 ±1.732 | 31.21 |
| ACP-High | 200 | 16.00 ±2.646** | 49.95 |
Compared with control group, **p <0.01. Date were expressed as means ± SD (n = 10).
Figure 5.Effect of the ACP on the spleen lymphocyte proliferation as induced by Con A
Figure 6.Effect of ACP on serum IL-2 and IFN-γ levels