Literature DB >> 33472051

Under-exploration of Three-Dimensional Images Leads to Search Errors for Small Salient Targets.

Miguel A Lago1, Aditya Jonnalagadda2, Craig K Abbey1, Bruno B Barufaldi3, Predrag R Bakic3, Andrew D A Maidment3, Winifred K Leung4, Susan P Weinstein3, Brian S Englander3, Miguel P Eckstein5.   

Abstract

Advances in 3D imaging technology are transforming how radiologists search for cancer1,2 and how security officers scrutinize baggage for dangerous objects.3 These new 3D technologies often improve search over 2D images4,5 but vastly increase the image data. Here, we investigate 3D search for targets of various sizes in filtered noise and digital breast phantoms. For a Bayesian ideal observer optimally processing the filtered noise and a convolutional neural network processing the digital breast phantoms, search with 3D image stacks increases target information and improves accuracy over search with 2D images. In contrast, 3D search by humans leads to high miss rates for small targets easily detected in 2D search, but not for larger targets more visible in the visual periphery. Analyses of human eye movements, perceptual judgments, and a computational model with a foveated visual system suggest that human errors can be explained by interaction among a target's peripheral visibility, eye movement under-exploration of the 3D images, and a perceived overestimation of the explored area. Instructing observers to extend the search reduces 75% of the small target misses without increasing false positives. Results with twelve radiologists confirm that even medical professionals reading realistic breast phantoms have high miss rates for small targets in 3D search. Thus, under-exploration represents a fundamental limitation to the efficacy with which humans search in 3D image stacks and miss targets with these prevalent image technologies.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D images; Bayesian ideal observer; cancer detection; convolutional neural network; digital breast tomosynthesis; eye movements; visual periphery; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33472051      PMCID: PMC8048135          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  58 in total

1.  An ideal observer with channels versus feature-independent processing of spatial frequency and orientation in visual search performance.

Authors:  Steven S Shimozaki; Miguel P Eckstein; Craig K Abbey
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.

Authors:  Mitra Noroozian; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Sahand Rahnama-Moghadam; Katherine A Klein; Deborah O Jeffries; Renee W Pinsky; Heang-Ping Chan; Paul L Carson; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Cognitive psychology: rare items often missed in visual searches.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Naomi M Kenner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  CT technology overview: 64-slice and beyond.

Authors:  Patrik Rogalla; Christian Kloeters; Patrick A Hein
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Foveal analysis and peripheral selection during active visual sampling.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; J Rhys Davies; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Attention in the real world: toward understanding its neural basis.

Authors:  Marius V Peelen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model.

Authors:  K J Myers; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information.

Authors:  A Burgess; H Ghandeharian
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Observer efficiency in free-localization tasks with correlated noise.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Medical image quality metrics for foveated model observers.

Authors:  Miguel A Lago; Craig K Abbey; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-08-16

2.  Comparative observer effects in 2D and 3D localization tasks.

Authors:  Craig K Abbey; Miguel A Lago; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-03-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.