Literature DB >> 33471194

In vitro cytotoxicity of different dental resin-cements on human cell lines.

Freya Diemer1, Helmut Stark2, Ernst-Heinrich Helfgen2, Norbert Enkling2,3, Rainer Probstmeier4, Jochen Winter5, Dominik Kraus6.   

Abstract

Adhesive resin-cements are increasingly used in modern dentistry. Nevertheless, released substances from resin materials have been shown to cause cellular toxic effects. Disc-shaped specimens from 12 different resin cements and one conventional zinc phosphate cement were prepared and used for direct stimulation of five different human cell lines via transwell cell culture system or in an indirect way using conditioned cell culture media. Cytotoxicity was determined using LDH and BCA assays. All tested cements led to a decrease of cell viability but to a distinct extent depending on cell type, luting material, and cytotoxicity assay. In general, cements exhibited a more pronounced cytotoxicity in direct stimulation experiments compared to stimulations using conditioned media. Interestingly, the conventional zinc phosphate cement showed the lowest impact on cell viability. On cellular level, highest cytotoxic effects were detected in osteoblastic cell lines. All resin cements reduced cell viability of human cells with significant differences depending on cell type and cement material. Especially, osteoblastic cells demonstrated a tremendous increase of cytotoxicity after cement exposure. Although the results of this in vitro study cannot be transferred directly to a clinical setting, it shows that eluted substances from resin cements may disturb osteoblastic homeostasis that in turn could lead to conditions favoring peri-implant bone destruction. Thus, the wide use of resin cements in every clinical situation should be scrutinized. A correct use with complete removal of all cement residues and a sufficient polymerization should be given the utmost attention in clinical usage.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33471194      PMCID: PMC7817560          DOI: 10.1007/s10856-020-06471-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  47 in total

Review 1.  Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products.

Authors:  J P Santerre; L Shajii; B W Leung
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials.

Authors:  W Geurtsen
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  2000

3.  In-vitro cytocompatibility of dental resin monomers on osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Dominik Kraus; Markus Wolfgarten; Norbert Enkling; Ernst-Heinrich Helfgen; Matthias Frentzen; Rainer Probstmeier; Jochen Winter; Helmut Stark
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  A clinically focused discussion of luting materials.

Authors:  E E Hill; J Lott
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.291

5.  Biocompatibility test of light-cured composites in vitro.

Authors:  M Nakamura; K Imai; H Oshima; T Kudo; S Yoshioka; H Kawahara
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Effect of dental cements on peri-implant microbial community: comparison of the microbial communities inhabiting the peri-implant tissue when using different luting cements.

Authors:  Michael Korsch; Silke-Mareike Marten; Andreas Dötsch; Ruy Jáuregui; Dietmar H Pieper; Ursula Obst
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements.

Authors:  A Schedle; A Franz; X Rausch-Fan; A Spittler; T Lucas; P Samorapoompichit; W Sperr; G Boltz-Nitulescu
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Does residual cement around implant-supported restorations cause peri-implant disease? A retrospective case analysis.

Authors:  Tomas Linkevicius; Algirdas Puisys; Egle Vindasiute; Laura Linkeviciene; Peteris Apse
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 9.  In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review.

Authors:  Michel Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  The cytotoxic and oxidative effects of restorative materials in cultured human gingival fibroblasts.

Authors:  Neslihan Celik; Damla Binnetoglu; Nurcan Ozakar Ilday; Ahmet Hacimuftuoglu; Nilgun Seven
Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.356

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.