| Literature DB >> 33469993 |
Sandra van Kuijk1, Ruth Kinkead2, Gillian Scoley2, Steven Morrison2, Yanming Han1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the effects of feeding immunized egg proteins (IEP) on the health and performance of newborn dairy calves. Sixty-four Holstein calves, both male and female, were divided over two treatments. Calves either received IEP or a placebo (PCB) in their colostrum and calf milk replacer (CMR) for the first 14 days of their life. Until day 49, CMR was offered at 15% of birth weight (BW), at 10% on days 49-57 and at 5% on days 57-63. In addition, calves received starter concentrate, chopped straw and water from 3 days old until 70 days old at the end of study. Individual CMR and concentrate intake were measured daily whilst BW was recorded weekly. Visual faecal scoring and health observations were conducted daily. Faecal samples were collected weekly up to 4 weeks and during the first 4 days of scouring to screen for presence of Cryptosporidium parvum, rotavirus, coronavirus, E. coli and Salmonella. Results indicated that feeding IEP increased BW (p < .05) at 42 and 56 days old, and BW also tended (p = .06) to be higher after weaning at 63-70 days old compared to the PCB group. When analysed using a repeated measures model, compared to feeding PCB, feeding IEP increased total concentrate consumption (p = .001) by 3.6kg/calf. Over the entire study, daily water intake was higher (p = .002) for the IEP group when compared with the PCB group. In the IEP group, 12 calves were scored as scouring whereas there were 14 calves in the PCB group. There were no significant differences between treatments in faecal pathogen load of neither healthy nor scouring calves. In conclusion, supplementing IEP during the first 14 days of calf life improved the performance of newborn calves. Further work is warranted to understand the mode of action of IEP in calves.Entities:
Keywords: diarrhoea; growth performance; immunized egg protein; newborn calves
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33469993 PMCID: PMC9290449 DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) ISSN: 0931-2439 Impact factor: 2.718
Composition of the calf milk replacer on dry matter basis used during the study
| Nutrient | Content |
|---|---|
| Total Milk Solids, % | 70 |
| Fat (measured as ether extract), % | 17 |
| Crude protein, % | 23 |
| Crude fibre, % | 0.05 |
| Ash, % | 8 |
| Gross Energy content, MJ/kg | 20.3 |
| Vitamin A, iu/kg | 50,000 |
| Vitamin D3, iu/kg | 6,000 |
| Vitamin E, mg/kg | 500 |
| Selenium, mg/kg | 0.36 |
| Copper, mg/kg | 13 |
Composition of the concentrates on fresh basis used during the study
| Nutrient | Content (%) |
|---|---|
| Maize | 21 |
| Barley | 20 |
| Soya | 19 |
| Wheat | 11 |
| Sugar beet | 10 |
| Soya hulls | 7.5 |
| Rapeseed | 5 |
| Molasses | 3 |
| Flour | 1.2 |
| Salt | 0.8 |
| Palm oil | 0.75 |
| Dairy mineral | 0.4 |
| Gross energy (MJ/kg) | 18.1 |
The body weight and average daily gain per calf measured weekly throughout the experimental period
| Age, Days | Body weight, kg | Average Daily Gain (ADG) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEP | PCB | SE |
| IEP | PCB | SE |
| |
| Birth | 41.3 | 39.6 | 0.73 | 0.085 | ||||
| 7 | 44.2 | 42.8 | 0.80 | 0.22 | 0.41 | 0.46 | 0.06 | 0.51 |
| 14 | 44.8 | 42.9 | 0.83 | 0.13 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.90 |
| 21 | 48.3 | 46.2 | 0.95 | 0.09 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 0.64 |
| 28 | 52.1 | 49.5 | 0.94 | 0.06 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.02 | 0.38 |
| 35 | 56.7 | 54.8 | 1.00 | 0.14 | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.81 |
| 42 | 62.2 | 59.1 | 1.09 | 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 0.15 |
| 49 | 66.9 | 64.0 | 1.14 | 0.05 | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.02 | 0.25 |
| 56 | 73.6 | 69.5 | 1.34 | 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
| 63 | 80.2 | 76.5 | 1.42 | 0.06 | 0.62 | 0.59 | 0.02 | 0.24 |
| 70 | 87.9 | 83.9 | 1.48 | 0.06 | 0.67 | 0.63 | 0.02 | 0.23 |
Abbreviations: IEP, immunized egg protein treatment group; PCB, placebo treatment group; SE, standard error.
Average daily gain between birth and days of age.
FIGURE 1The average daily milk replacer intake per calf for each day until weaning. Dotted line represents the immunized egg protein (IEP) group, and the solid line represents the placebo (PCB) group
FIGURE 2The average daily concentrate intake per calf per day during the entire study. Dotted line represents the immunized egg protein (IEP) group, and the solid line represents the placebo (PCB) group
FIGURE 3The average daily water intake per calf per day during the entire study. Dotted line represents the immunized egg protein (IEP) group, and the solid line represents the placebo (PCB) group
Cumulative feed intake throughout the experimental period (d 3–63)
| Treatment | SE |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEP | PCB | Treatment | Treatment × Day | ||
| CMR (kgDM) | 48.5 | 47.9 | 0.17 | 0.804 | <0.001 |
| Concentrate (kgDM) | 34.5 | 30.9 | 0.64 | 0.025 | 0.001 |
| CMR + concentrate (kgDM) | 83.0 | 78.9 | 0.65 | 0.034 | <0.001 |
| Total drinking water (L) | 80.3 | 65.7 | 2.52 | 0.123 | 0.002 |
Abbreviations: CMR, calf milk replacer; IEP, immunized egg protein treatment group; PCB, placebo treatment group; SE, standard error.
The number of calves in which the pathogen was detected above cut‐off level. The numbers in brackets are the scouring calves in which the pathogen was detected above cut‐off level
| Parasitology | Virology | Bacteriology | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Rotavirus | Coronavirus |
|
| ||
| Positive cut‐off level | >1,000 OPG | >0 Ct RNA | >0 Ct RNA | Qualitative | 1 × 107 CFU/g | |
| Age, days | ||||||
| Immunized egg protein ( | 1 | 1 (1) | 7 (3) | 1 (1) | 0 | 28 |
| 7 | 9 (6) | 27 (12) | 1 (1) | 0 | 21 | |
| 14 | 23 (10) | 30 (11) | 2 (1) | 0 | 18 | |
| 21 | 3 (2) | 26 (12) | 1 (1) | 0 | 8 | |
| 28 | 8 (2) | 23 (9) | 3 (2) | 0 | 16 | |
| Total % | 27.5 | 70.6 | 5.0 | 0 | 56.9 | |
| Placebo ( | 1 | 5 (2) | 5 (4) | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| 7 | 5 (3) | 28 (13) | 0 | 0 | 23 | |
| 14 | 17 (8) | 24 (12) | 7 (4) | 0 | 17 | |
| 21 | 4 (0) | 27 (12) | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| 28 | 5 (3) | 21 (11) | 4 (1) | 0 | 9 | |
| Total % | 22.5 | 65.6 | 6.9 | 0 | 55.0 | |
Determined from mean level detected.
Total %=percentage positive of all samples taken.