Literature DB >> 33469103

Clinical outcomes between calcium channel blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients without established cardiovascular diseases during a 3-year follow-up.

Han Saem Jeong1, Hong-Seok Lim2, Hun-Jun Park3, Wang-Soo Lee4, Jin-Oh Choi5, Hui Seung Lee6, Sang-Ho Jo7, Soon Jun Hong8.   

Abstract

Although both angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are all suitable for the initiation of antihypertensive treatment, studies investigating efficacy and safety between ARBs and CCBs are limited, and there is no previous study comparing their clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up periods in real world setting. We compared cardiovascular (CV) events between ARBs and CCBs in 464,948 hypertensive adults using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database during a 3-year follow-up. The patients with hypertension without heart failure, ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral artery disease were enrolled. The CV events between only single prescription of CCBs and ARBs were finally compared. The primary endpoint for this study was the first occurrence of a major adverse CV events, defined as the composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. ARB was significantly more administered in male and patients with higher income, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney diseases, and higher Charlson comorbidity index. The primary endpoints occurred in 10,526 patients (5.2%) in the ARB group and in 19,363 patients (7.3%) in the CCB group (p < 0.001) during a 3-year follow-up (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.98). All the components of CV events including all-cause death, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke occurred more frequently in the CCB group. With multivariable models adjusting age, sex, income, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and Charlson comorbidity index, the primary endpoints less frequently developed in the ARB group than in the CCB group (HR 0.957, 95% CI 0.933-0.983, p < 0.001). After the propensity-score matching, baseline characteristics were similar and still showed significantly better primary endpoints in ARB group than CCB group (5.3% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001). In this nationwide population-based simple hypertension study, administration of ARBs showed superior protection against CV events than CCBs during a 3-year follow-up. Our results suggest that ARBs could be preferred over CCBs as the initial choice of antihypertensive treatment regardless of age in real-world practice.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33469103      PMCID: PMC7815918          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81373-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  28 in total

1.  Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  E J Lewis; L G Hunsicker; W R Clarke; T Berl; M A Pohl; J B Lewis; E Ritz; R C Atkins; R Rohde; I Raz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of the effects of treatment on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Arnfried U Klingbeil; Markus Schneider; Peter Martus; Franz H Messerli; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Impact of new-onset diabetes mellitus on cardiac outcomes in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial population.

Authors:  Tonje A Aksnes; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Morten Rostrup; Per Omvik; Tsushung A Hua; Stevo Julius
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in high vascular risk.

Authors:  Louis Potier; Ronan Roussel; Yedid Elbez; Michel Marre; Uwe Zeymer; Christopher M Reid; Magnus Ohman; Kim A Eagle; Deepak L Bhatt; Philippe Gabriel Steg
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Effects of blood pressure-lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension: 5. Head-to-head comparisons of various classes of antihypertensive drugs - overview and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Costas Thomopoulos; Gianfranco Parati; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael Weber; Hans R Brunner; Steffan Ekman; Lennart Hansson; Tsushung Hua; John Laragh; Gordon T McInnes; Lada Mitchell; Francis Plat; Anthony Schork; Beverly Smith; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Angiotensin receptor blocker improves coronary flow velocity reserve in hypertensive patients: comparison with calcium channel blocker.

Authors:  Fumihiko Kamezaki; Hiromi Tasaki; Kazuhito Yamashita; Kiyoko Shibata; Noriko Hirakawa; Masato Tsutsui; Ryouji Kouzuma; Toshihisa Nagatomo; Tetsuo Adachi; Yutaka Otsuji
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Richard B Devereux; Kristian Wachtell; Eva Gerdts; Kurt Boman; Markku S Nieminen; Vasilios Papademetriou; Jens Rokkedal; Katherine Harris; Peter Aurup; Björn Dahlöf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prescribing Patterns of Antihypertensives for Treatment-Naïve Patients in South Korea: From Korean NHISS Claim Data.

Authors:  Sang Hyuck Kim; Dong Wook Shin; Shinhye Kim; Kyungdo Han; Sang-Hyun Park; Yul-Hee Kim; Shin-Ae Jeon; Yong-Chol Kwon
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 2.420

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  3,4-Dihydro-2(1H)-Pyridones as Building Blocks of Synthetic Relevance.

Authors:  Sisa Chalán-Gualán; Vida Castro; Ruth Oropeza; Margarita Suárez; Fernando Albericio; Hortensia Rodríguez
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.927

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.