Angiotensin receptor blocker improves coronary flow velocity reserve in hypertensive patients: comparison with calcium channel blocker.

Large-scale clinical studies have indicated that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have beneficial effects against cardiovascular diseases. We designed this study to compare the effects of an ARB and a calcium channel blocker (CCB) on coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), a predictor of cardiovascular events, as estimated using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Sixteen hypertensive patients (63.1+/-9.6 years old; 10 males) were randomly allocated in a double-blind fashion to valsartan (n=8, 40-80 mg/day) or nifedipine (n=8, 20-40 mg/day) groups. Age- and gender-matched subjects without hypertension were enrolled as a control group (n=12). CFVR was calculated by dividing the adenosine triphosphate-induced hyperemic flow velocity by the basal flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery. Baseline characteristics and reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure after 6 months were similar in both groups. CFVR in the valsartan group increased from 2.34+/-0.38 to 3.10+/-0.84 at 2 months (p<0.05), and to 3.04+/-1.09 at 6 months (p<0.01). Both values became comparable to that in the control group (2.81+/-0.60). CFVR in the valsartan group was significantly higher (p<0.001) than that in the nifedipine group, which was little changed at 6 months. This discrepancy was derived from the significant increase of hyperemic velocity in the valsartan group, from 36.6+/-17.3 cm/s to 41.1+/-12.7 cm/s at 2 months, and to 48.1+/-20.2 cm/s at 6 months. We concluded that the ARB valsartan not only reduced high blood pressure but improved CFVR in hypertensive patients. However, these effects were not seen with the CCB nifedipine.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes