Huziel E Sauceda1,2,3, Valentin Vassilev-Galindo4, Stefan Chmiela5, Klaus-Robert Müller6,7,8,9, Alexandre Tkatchenko10. 1. Department of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. sauceda@tu-berlin.de. 2. Machine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587, Berlin, Germany. sauceda@tu-berlin.de. 3. BASLEARN, BASF-TU joint Lab, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587, Berlin, Germany. sauceda@tu-berlin.de. 4. Department of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. 5. Machine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587, Berlin, Germany. 6. Machine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587, Berlin, Germany. klaus-robert.mueller@tu-berlin.de. 7. Department of Artificial Intelligence, Korea University, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea. klaus-robert.mueller@tu-berlin.de. 8. Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Stuhlsatzenhausweg, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany. klaus-robert.mueller@tu-berlin.de. 9. Google Research, Brain team, Berlin, Germany. klaus-robert.mueller@tu-berlin.de. 10. Department of Physics and Materials Science, University of Luxembourg, L-1511, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg. alexandre.tkatchenko@uni.lu.
Abstract
Nuclear quantum effects (NQE) tend to generate delocalized molecular dynamics due to the inclusion of the zero point energy and its coupling with the anharmonicities in interatomic interactions. Here, we present evidence that NQE often enhance electronic interactions and, in turn, can result in dynamical molecular stabilization at finite temperature. The underlying physical mechanism promoted by NQE depends on the particular interaction under consideration. First, the effective reduction of interatomic distances between functional groups within a molecule can enhance the n → π* interaction by increasing the overlap between molecular orbitals or by strengthening electrostatic interactions between neighboring charge densities. Second, NQE can localize methyl rotors by temporarily changing molecular bond orders and leading to the emergence of localized transient rotor states. Third, for noncovalent van der Waals interactions the strengthening comes from the increase of the polarizability given the expanded average interatomic distances induced by NQE. The implications of these boosted interactions include counterintuitive hydroxyl-hydroxyl bonding, hindered methyl rotor dynamics, and molecular stiffening which generates smoother free-energy surfaces. Our findings yield new insights into the versatile role of nuclear quantum fluctuations in molecules and materials.
Nuclear quantum effects (n class="Chemical">NQE) tend to generate delocalized molecular dynamics due to the inclusion of the zero point energy and its coupling with the anharmonicities in interatomic interactions. Here, we present evidence that NQE often enhance electronic interactions and, in turn, can result in dynamical molecular stabilization at finite temperature. The underlying physical mechanism promoted by NQE depends on the particular interaction under consideration. First, the effective reduction of interatomic distances between functional groups within a molecule can enhance the n → π* interaction by increasing the overlap between molecular orbitals or by strengthening electrostatic interactions between neighboring charge densities. Second, NQE can localize methyl rotors by temporarily changing molecular bond orders and leading to the emergence of localized transient rotor states. Third, for noncovalent van der Waals interactions the strengthening comes from the increase of the polarizability given the expanded average interatomic distances induced by NQE. The implications of these boosted interactions include counterintuitive hydroxyl-hydroxyl bonding, hindered methyl rotor dynamics, and molecular stiffening which generates smoother free-energy surfaces. Our findings yield new insights into the versatile role of nuclear quantum fluctuations in molecules and materials.
Authors: Buddha Ratna Shrestha; Sreekiran Pillai; Adriano Santana; Stephen H Donaldson; Tod A Pascal; Himanshu Mishra Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Daniel G A Smith; Lori A Burns; Dominic A Sirianni; Daniel R Nascimento; Ashutosh Kumar; Andrew M James; Jeffrey B Schriber; Tianyuan Zhang; Boyi Zhang; Adam S Abbott; Eric J Berquist; Marvin H Lechner; Leonardo A Cunha; Alexander G Heide; Jonathan M Waldrop; Tyler Y Takeshita; Asem Alenaizan; Daniel Neuhauser; Rollin A King; Andrew C Simmonett; Justin M Turney; Henry F Schaefer; Francesco A Evangelista; A Eugene DePrince; T Daniel Crawford; Konrad Patkowski; C David Sherrill Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 6.006
Authors: C Jake Harris; Marion Scheibe; Somsakul Pop Wongpalee; Wanlu Liu; Evan M Cornett; Robert M Vaughan; Xueqin Li; Wei Chen; Yan Xue; Zhenhui Zhong; Linda Yen; William D Barshop; Shima Rayatpisheh; Javier Gallego-Bartolome; Martin Groth; Zonghua Wang; James A Wohlschlegel; Jiamu Du; Scott B Rothbart; Falk Butter; Steven E Jacobsen Journal: Science Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Huziel E Sauceda; Luis E Gálvez-González; Stefan Chmiela; Lauro Oliver Paz-Borbón; Klaus-Robert Müller; Alexandre Tkatchenko Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Oliver T Unke; Stefan Chmiela; Huziel E Sauceda; Michael Gastegger; Igor Poltavsky; Kristof T Schütt; Alexandre Tkatchenko; Klaus-Robert Müller Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 60.622