Literature DB >> 33468253

Neural stemness contributes to cell tumorigenicity.

Liyang Xu1, Min Zhang1, Lihua Shi1, Xiaoli Yang1, Lu Chen1, Ning Cao1, Anhua Lei1, Ying Cao2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated the dependence of cancer on nerve. Recently, a growing number of studies reveal that cancer cells share the property and regulatory network with neural stem/progenitor cells. However, relationship between the property of neural stemness and cell tumorigenicity is unknown.
RESULTS: We show that neural stem/progenitor cells, but not non-neural embryonic or somatic stem/progenitor cell types, exhibit tumorigenicity and the potential for differentiation into tissue types of all germ layers when they are placed in non-native environment by transplantation into immunodeficient nude mice. Likewise, cancer cells capable of tumor initiation have the property of neural stemness because of their abilities in neurosphere formation in neural stem cell-specific serum-free medium and in differentiation potential, in addition to their neuronal differentiation potential that was characterized previously. Moreover, loss of a pro-differentiation factor in myoblasts, which have no tumorigenicity, lead to the loss of myoblast identity, and gain of the property of neural stemness, tumorigenicity and potential for re-differentiation. By contrast, loss of neural stemness via differentiation results in the loss of tumorigenicity. These suggest that the property of neural stemness contributes to cell tumorigenicity, and tumor phenotypic heterogeneity might be an effect of differentiation potential of neural stemness. Bioinformatic analysis reveals that neural genes in general are correlated with embryonic development and cancer, in addition to their role in neural development; whereas non-neural genes are not. Most of neural specific genes emerged in typical species representing transition from unicellularity to multicellularity during evolution. Genes in Monosiga brevicollis, a unicellular species that is a closest known relative of metazoans, are biased toward neural cells.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the property of neural stemness is the source of cell tumorigenicity. This is due to that neural biased unicellular state is the ground state for multicellularity and hence cell type diversification or differentiation during evolution, and tumorigenesis is a process of restoration of neural ground state in somatic cells along a default route that is pre-determined by an evolutionary advantage of neural state.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Differentiation potential; Evo-devo; Neural ground state; Neural stem/progenitor cell; Neural stemness; Tumor-initiating cell; Tumorigenesis; Tumorigenicity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468253      PMCID: PMC7814647          DOI: 10.1186/s13578-021-00531-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biosci        ISSN: 2045-3701            Impact factor:   7.133


  49 in total

Review 1.  Concise review: dedifferentiation meets cancer development: proof of concept for epigenetic cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Yamada; Hironori Haga; Yasuhiro Yamada
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  A recurrent neomorphic mutation in MYOD1 defines a clinically aggressive subset of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma associated with PI3K-AKT pathway mutations.

Authors:  Shinji Kohsaka; Neerav Shukla; Nabahet Ameur; Tatsuo Ito; Charlotte K Y Ng; Lu Wang; Diana Lim; Angela Marchetti; Agnes Viale; Mono Pirun; Nicholas D Socci; Li-Xuan Qin; Raf Sciot; Julia Bridge; Samuel Singer; Paul Meyers; Leonard H Wexler; Frederic G Barr; Snjezana Dogan; Jonathan A Fletcher; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  The Amphimedon queenslandica genome and the evolution of animal complexity.

Authors:  Mansi Srivastava; Oleg Simakov; Jarrod Chapman; Bryony Fahey; Marie E A Gauthier; Therese Mitros; Gemma S Richards; Cecilia Conaco; Michael Dacre; Uffe Hellsten; Claire Larroux; Nicholas H Putnam; Mario Stanke; Maja Adamska; Aaron Darling; Sandie M Degnan; Todd H Oakley; David C Plachetzki; Yufeng Zhai; Marcin Adamski; Andrew Calcino; Scott F Cummins; David M Goodstein; Christina Harris; Daniel J Jackson; Sally P Leys; Shengqiang Shu; Ben J Woodcroft; Michel Vervoort; Kenneth S Kosik; Gerard Manning; Bernard M Degnan; Daniel S Rokhsar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Biosafety and bioefficacy assessment of human mesenchymal stem cells: what do we know so far?

Authors:  Kar Wey Yong; Jane Ru Choi; Asdani Saifullah Dolbashid; Wan Kamarul Zaman Wan Safwani
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.806

5.  Altered interactions between unicellular and multicellular genes drive hallmarks of transformation in a diverse range of solid tumors.

Authors:  Anna S Trigos; Richard B Pearson; Anthony T Papenfuss; David L Goode
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Osteoid and bone formation in a nasal mucosal melanoma and its metastasis.

Authors:  J J Hoorweg; B M Loftus; F J Hilgers
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans.

Authors:  Mansi Srivastava; Emina Begovic; Jarrod Chapman; Nicholas H Putnam; Uffe Hellsten; Takeshi Kawashima; Alan Kuo; Therese Mitros; Asaf Salamov; Meredith L Carpenter; Ana Y Signorovitch; Maria A Moreno; Kai Kamm; Jane Grimwood; Jeremy Schmutz; Harris Shapiro; Igor V Grigoriev; Leo W Buss; Bernd Schierwater; Stephen L Dellaporta; Daniel S Rokhsar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Evolution of Tumor Metabolism might Reflect Carcinogenesis as a Reverse Evolution process (Dismantling of Multicellularity).

Authors:  Khalid O Alfarouk; Mohammed E A Shayoub; Abdel Khalig Muddathir; Gamal O Elhassan; Adil H H Bashir
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Stem cell and neurogenic gene-expression profiles link prostate basal cells to aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dingxiao Zhang; Daechan Park; Yi Zhong; Yue Lu; Kiera Rycaj; Shuai Gong; Xin Chen; Xin Liu; Hsueh-Ping Chao; Pamela Whitney; Tammy Calhoun-Davis; Yoko Takata; Jianjun Shen; Vishwanath R Iyer; Dean G Tang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Tumorigenesis as a process of gradual loss of original cell identity and gain of properties of neural precursor/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Ying Cao
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 7.133

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Nerves in gastrointestinal cancer: from mechanism to modulations.

Authors:  Nathalie Vaes; Musa Idris; Werend Boesmans; Maria M Alves; Veerle Melotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 73.082

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.