Literature DB >> 33468170

Family, school and individual characteristics associated with adolescents' physical activity at school in Hong Kong: the iHealt(H) study.

Alison Carver1, Muhammad Akram2, Anthony Barnett2, Wendy Yajun Huang3, Gemma Yang Gao3, Robin R Mellecker4, Ester Cerin2,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescents (11-18-year-olds) are at risk of physical inactivity. There is limited knowledge of physical activity (PA) levels among adolescents in the school setting in Hong Kong. We developed and tested a novel theoretical model of how household/family characteristics, school-level social and physical environmental factors and individual adolescent's characteristics impact on their school-based PA during and after school hours.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study participants were Hong Kong adolescents attending secondary school, paired with their parent/caregiver (n = 1299 dyads). Parents survey-reported on household/family characteristics, parental PA and rules related to PA. Adolescents survey-reported on school PA-friendly policy, PA equipment at school (combined to create PA-friendly index), social support for PA from peers, athletic ability, attitude to and enjoyment of PA. Adolescents self-reported their school-based PA during school hours (physical education; recess) and after school (sports teams/classes). Objectively-measured moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) was measured using accelerometers for a sub-sample of adolescents (n = 588). Generalized additive mixed models were used to estimate how household/family-level and school-level factors, and adolescents' individual characteristics were related to adolescents' school-based PA in Hong Kong, and to identify potential mediators of these associations.
RESULTS: A complex network of potential pathways of influence on adolescents' school-based PA was identified. Overall, most of the significant effects were indirect ones. However, there were far fewer significant pathways between household/family characteristics and objectively-measured MVPA at school than there were for self-reported PA at school. In fact, there were no indirect pathways between these variables and MVPA at school. Gender disparities among pathways were identified. For example, school PA-friendly index was significantly associated with MVPA after school only among girls (eb = 1.06, 95%CI (1.02,1.12)).
CONCLUSIONS: Key points of intervention identified by our study may be in the re-design of PE classes so that adolescents spend more time being physically active during these classes, and promotion of active play during recess. Further research measuring amount, intensity and location of adolescents' PA using accelerometer and Global Positioning Systems is required in Hong Kong, as well as observational studies of PA during PE classes and in the schoolyard during recess, to guide the design of PA interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Asia; Family; Household characteristics; Mediation analysis; Physical activity; School

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468170      PMCID: PMC7816388          DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01085-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act        ISSN: 1479-5868            Impact factor:   6.457


  39 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth.

Authors:  William B Strong; Robert M Malina; Cameron J R Blimkie; Stephen R Daniels; Rodney K Dishman; Bernard Gutin; Albert C Hergenroeder; Aviva Must; Patricia A Nixon; James M Pivarnik; Thomas Rowland; Stewart Trost; François Trudeau
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 2.  Socioeconomic status and child development.

Authors:  Robert H Bradley; Robert F Corwyn
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Are children and adolescents less active if parents restrict their physical activity and active transport due to perceived risk?

Authors:  Alison Carver; Anna Timperio; Kylie Hesketh; David Crawford
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Individual, social and neighbourhood correlates of cycling among children living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods.

Authors:  Lisa Bell; Anna Timperio; Jenny Veitch; Alison Carver
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 5.  Physical activity during school recess: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola D Ridgers; Jo Salmon; Anne-Maree Parrish; Rebecca M Stanley; Anthony D Okely
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Tracking of activity and fitness and the relationship with cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Authors:  J W Twisk; H C Kemper; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Which school- and home-based factors in elementary school-age children predict physical activity and sedentary behavior in secondary school-age children? A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cindy Rutten; Filip Boen; Jan Seghers
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-04-17

Review 8.  Psychological determinants of physical activity across the life course: A "DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity" (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review.

Authors:  Cristina Cortis; Anna Puggina; Caterina Pesce; Katina Aleksovska; Christoph Buck; Con Burns; Greet Cardon; Angela Carlin; Chantal Simon; Donatella Ciarapica; Giancarlo Condello; Tara Coppinger; Sara D'Haese; Marieke De Craemer; Andrea Di Blasio; Sylvia Hansen; Licia Iacoviello; Johann Issartel; Pascal Izzicupo; Lina Jaeschke; Martina Kanning; Aileen Kennedy; Fiona Chun Man Ling; Agnes Luzak; Giorgio Napolitano; Julie-Anne Nazare; Grainne O'Donoghue; Camille Perchoux; Tobias Pischon; Angela Polito; Alessandra Sannella; Holger Schulz; Rhoda Sohun; Astrid Steinbrecher; Wolfgang Schlicht; Walter Ricciardi; Loriana Castellani; Ciaran MacDonncha; Laura Capranica; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Factors of physical activity among Chinese children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Congchao Lu; Ronald P Stolk; Pieter J J Sauer; Anna Sijtsma; Rikstje Wiersma; Guowei Huang; Eva Corpeleijn
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Does the frequency and intensity of physical activity in adolescence have an impact on bone? The Tromsø Study, Fit Futures.

Authors:  Tore Christoffersen; Anne Winther; Ole Andreas Nilsen; Luai Awad Ahmed; Anne-Sofie Furberg; Guri Grimnes; Elaine Dennison; Nina Emaus
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.