Amy Wheldrake1, Estelle Guillemois1, Vera Chetty1, Albert Kilian2, Stephen J Russell3. 1. Nonwovens Innovation & Research Institute Ltd, 169 Meanwood Road, Leeds, LS7 1SR, West Yorkshire, UK. 2. Tropical Health LLP, Montagut, Spain. 3. Nonwovens Innovation & Research Institute Ltd, 169 Meanwood Road, Leeds, LS7 1SR, West Yorkshire, UK. stephenr@nonwovens-innovation.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In common with the majority of personal protective equipment and healthcare products, the ability for long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) to remain in good physical condition during use is a key factor governing fitness for purpose and serviceability. The inherent ability of a product to resist physical deterioration should be known in advance of it being used to ensure it has maximum value to both the end-user and procurer. The objective of this study was to develop a single performance metric of resistance to damage (RD) that can be applied to any LLIN product prior to distribution. METHODS: Algorithms to calculate RD values were developed based on consideration of both human factors and laboratory testing data. Quantitative reference forces applied to LLINs by users during normal use were determined so that aspirational performance levels could be established. The ability of LLINs to resist mechanical damage was assessed based on a new suite of textile tests, reflecting actual mechanisms of physical deterioration during normal household use. These tests quantified the snag strength, bursting strength, abrasion resistance and resistance to hole enlargement. Sixteen different unused LLINs were included in the analysis. The calculated RD values for all LLINs and the corresponding physical integrity data for the same nets retrieved from the field (up to 3 years of use) were then compared. RESULTS: On a RD scale of 0 (lowest resistance) - 100 (highest resistance), only six of the sixteen LLINs achieved an RD value above 50. No current LLIN achieved the aspirational level of resistance to damage (RD = 100), suggesting that product innovation is urgently required to increase the RD of LLINs. LLINs with higher RD values were associated with lower hole damage (PHI) in the field when adjusted for normal use conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The RD value of any LLIN product can be determined prior to distribution based on the developed algorithms and laboratory textile testing data. Generally, LLINs need to achieve higher RD values to improve their ability to resist hole formation during normal use. Innovation in LLIN product design focused on the textile material should be actively encouraged and is urgently needed to close the performance gap.
BACKGROUND: In common with the majority of personal protective equipment and healthcare products, the ability for long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) to remain in good physical condition during use is a key factor governing fitness for purpose and serviceability. The inherent ability of a product to resist physical deterioration should be known in advance of it being used to ensure it has maximum value to both the end-user and procurer. The objective of this study was to develop a single performance metric of resistance to damage (RD) that can be applied to any LLIN product prior to distribution. METHODS: Algorithms to calculate RD values were developed based on consideration of both human factors and laboratory testing data. Quantitative reference forces applied to LLINs by users during normal use were determined so that aspirational performance levels could be established. The ability of LLINs to resist mechanical damage was assessed based on a new suite of textile tests, reflecting actual mechanisms of physical deterioration during normal household use. These tests quantified the snag strength, bursting strength, abrasion resistance and resistance to hole enlargement. Sixteen different unused LLINs were included in the analysis. The calculated RD values for all LLINs and the corresponding physical integrity data for the same nets retrieved from the field (up to 3 years of use) were then compared. RESULTS: On a RD scale of 0 (lowest resistance) - 100 (highest resistance), only six of the sixteen LLINs achieved an RD value above 50. No current LLIN achieved the aspirational level of resistance to damage (RD = 100), suggesting that product innovation is urgently required to increase the RD of LLINs. LLINs with higher RD values were associated with lower hole damage (PHI) in the field when adjusted for normal use conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The RD value of any LLIN product can be determined prior to distribution based on the developed algorithms and laboratory textile testing data. Generally, LLINs need to achieve higher RD values to improve their ability to resist hole formation during normal use. Innovation in LLIN product design focused on the textile material should be actively encouraged and is urgently needed to close the performance gap.
Authors: S P Kachur; P A Phillips-Howard; A M Odhacha; T K Ruebush; A J Oloo; B L Nahlen Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Jodi L Vanden Eng; Adeline Chan; Ana Paula Abílio; Adam Wolkon; Gabriel Ponce de Leon; John Gimnig; Juliette Morgan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kathrine R Tan; Jane Coleman; Barbara Smith; Busiku Hamainza; Cecilia Katebe-Sakala; Casey Kean; Ashley Kowal; Jodi Vanden Eng; Tiffany K Parris; Carla T Mapp; Stephen C Smith; Robert Wirtz; Mulakwa Kamuliwo; Allen S Craig Journal: Malar J Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Peter W Gething; Samir Bhatt; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Caitlin A Bever; Hannah Koenker; Daniel J Weiss; Camilo Vargas-Ruiz; Anita K Nandi; Harry S Gibson; Joseph Harris; Katherine E Battle; Susan F Rumisha; Suzanne Keddie; Punam Amratia; Rohan Arambepola; Ewan Cameron; Elisabeth G Chestnutt; Emma L Collins; Justin Millar; Swapnil Mishra; Jennifer Rozier; Tasmin Symons; Katherine A Twohig; T Deirdre Hollingsworth Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 14.919