Albert Kilian1, Emmanuel Obi2, Paul Mansiangi3, Ana Paula Abílio4, Khamis Ameir Haji5, Estelle Guillemois6, Vera Chetty6, Amy Wheldrake6, Sean Blaufuss7, Bolanje Olapeju7, Stella Babalola7, Stephen J Russell6, Hannah Koenker7. 1. PMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Montagut, Spain. albert@trophealth.com. 2. PMI VectorWorks Project, Tropical Health LLP, Abuja, Nigeria. 3. Ecole de Santé Publique, Université de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. 4. Instituto Nacional de Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique. 5. Zanzibar Malaria Elimination Programme, Stone Town, Zanzibar, Tanzania. 6. Nonwovens Innovation and Research Institute Ltd. (NIRI), Leeds, UK. 7. PMI VectorWorks Project, JHU Center for Communication Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Attempts have been made to link procurement of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) not only to the price but also the expected performance of the product. However, to date it has not been possible to identify a specific textile characteristic that predicts physical durability in the field. The recently developed resistance to damage (RD) score could provide such a metric. This study uses pooled data from durability monitoring to explore the usefulness of the RD methodology. METHODS: Data from standardized, 3-year, prospective LLIN durability monitoring for six LLIN brands in 10 locations and four countries involving 4672 campaign LLIN were linked to the RD scores of the respective LLIN brands. The RD score is a single quantitative metric based on a suite of standardized textile tests which in turn build on the mechanisms of damage to a mosquito net. Potential RD values range from 0 to 100 where 100 represents optimal resistance to expected day-to-day stress during reasonable net use. Survival analysis was set so that risk of failure only started when nets were first hung. Cox regression was applied to explore RD effects on physical survival adjusting for known net use environment variables. RESULTS: In a bivariate analysis RD scores showed a linear relationship with physical integrity suggesting that the proportion of LLIN with moderate damage decreased by 3%-points for each 10-point increase of the RD score (p = 0.02, R2 = 0.65). Full adjustment for net care and handling behaviours as well as other relevant determinants and the country of study showed that increasing RD score by 10 points resulted in a 36% reduction of risk of failure to survive in serviceable condition (p < 0.0001). LLINs with RD scores above 50 had an additional useful life of 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides proof of principle that the RD metric can predict physical durability of LLIN products in the field and could be used to assess new products and guide manufacturers in creating improved products. However, additional validation from other field data, particularly for next generation LLIN, will be required before the RD score can be included in procurement decisions for LLINs.
BACKGROUND: Attempts have been made to link procurement of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) not only to the price but also the expected performance of the product. However, to date it has not been possible to identify a specific textile characteristic that predicts physical durability in the field. The recently developed resistance to damage (RD) score could provide such a metric. This study uses pooled data from durability monitoring to explore the usefulness of the RD methodology. METHODS: Data from standardized, 3-year, prospective LLIN durability monitoring for six LLIN brands in 10 locations and four countries involving 4672 campaign LLIN were linked to the RD scores of the respective LLIN brands. The RD score is a single quantitative metric based on a suite of standardized textile tests which in turn build on the mechanisms of damage to a mosquito net. Potential RD values range from 0 to 100 where 100 represents optimal resistance to expected day-to-day stress during reasonable net use. Survival analysis was set so that risk of failure only started when nets were first hung. Cox regression was applied to explore RD effects on physical survival adjusting for known net use environment variables. RESULTS: In a bivariate analysis RD scores showed a linear relationship with physical integrity suggesting that the proportion of LLIN with moderate damage decreased by 3%-points for each 10-point increase of the RD score (p = 0.02, R2 = 0.65). Full adjustment for net care and handling behaviours as well as other relevant determinants and the country of study showed that increasing RD score by 10 points resulted in a 36% reduction of risk of failure to survive in serviceable condition (p < 0.0001). LLINs with RD scores above 50 had an additional useful life of 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides proof of principle that the RD metric can predict physical durability of LLIN products in the field and could be used to assess new products and guide manufacturers in creating improved products. However, additional validation from other field data, particularly for next generation LLIN, will be required before the RD score can be included in procurement decisions for LLINs.
Entities:
Keywords:
LLIN physical durability; Textile resistance to damage
Authors: Juliette Morgan; Ana Paula Abílio; Maria do Rosario Pondja; Dulcisária Marrenjo; Jacinta Luciano; Guilhermina Fernandes; Samira Sabindy; Adam Wolkon; Gabriel Ponce de Leon; Adeline Chan; Jodi Vanden Eng Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Paul Mansiangi; Solange Umesumbu; Irène Etewa; Jacques Zandibeni; Nissi Bafwa; Sean Blaufuss; Bolanle Olapeju; Ferdinand Ntoya; Aboubacar Sadou; Seth Irish; Eric Mukomena; Lydie Kalindula; Francis Watsenga; Martin Akogbeto; Stella Babalola; Hannah Koenker; Albert Kilian Journal: Malar J Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Lena M Lorenz; John Bradley; Joshua Yukich; Dennis J Massue; Zawadi Mageni Mboma; Olivier Pigeon; Jason Moore; Albert Kilian; Jo Lines; William Kisinza; Hans J Overgaard; Sarah J Moore Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Peter W Gething; Samir Bhatt; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Caitlin A Bever; Hannah Koenker; Daniel J Weiss; Camilo Vargas-Ruiz; Anita K Nandi; Harry S Gibson; Joseph Harris; Katherine E Battle; Susan F Rumisha; Suzanne Keddie; Punam Amratia; Rohan Arambepola; Ewan Cameron; Elisabeth G Chestnutt; Emma L Collins; Justin Millar; Swapnil Mishra; Jennifer Rozier; Tasmin Symons; Katherine A Twohig; T Deirdre Hollingsworth Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Edith P Madumla; Sarah J Moore; Jason Moore; Emmanuel Mbuba; Edgar M Mbeyela; Ummi A Kibondo; Selemani C; Dickson Kobe; Jitihada Baraka; Daniel Msellemu; Johnson K Swai; Zawadi M Mboma; Olukayode G Odufuwa Journal: Malar J Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 2.979