Riitta Vilkko1, Sari Räisänen2, Mika Gissler3, Vedran Stefanovic4, Seppo Heinonen5. 1. Doctoral Programme in Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmanninkatu 8, 00290, Helsinki, Finland. riitta.vilkko@helsinki.fi. 2. School of Health, Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Kuntokatu 3, 33520, Tampere, Finland. 3. Information Services Department, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00270, Helsinki, Finland. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetomaternal Medical Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 2, 00290, Helsinki, Finland. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 2, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective population-based study, utilizing the data of 601 247 singleton hospital deliveries collected from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (MBR) in 2006-2016. The aim of this study was to analyse the busy day effect on intrapartum adverse maternal outcomes. METHODS: To implement the study design, daily delivery frequencies and ranges (min-max) for each delivery unit (n = 26) were stratified to the daily delivery volume distributions by the delivery unit's annual delivery volume and profile: Category (C)1 < 1000, C2 1000-1999, C3 2000-2999, C4 ≥ 3000 and C5 the profile of university hospitals. To study the busy day effect, the quiet, optimal and busy days were defined by calculating the number of days (%) with the lowest and highest daily delivery frequencies and summed to the nearest 10 % in each hospital category. Optimal days were determined by calculating approximately 80 % of deliveries occurring between the lowest 10 %, and highest 10 % in each hospital category. Crude and adjusted odd ratios (ORs) with 99 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used to analyze the busy day effect on adverse maternal outcomes, blood transfusions, manual removal of the placenta and obstetric anal sphincter injuries, separately in each hospital category. RESULTS: The busy day effect was associated with the 28 % (99 % CI 8-52 %) and 25 % (99 % CI 11-40 %) increased need for blood transfusions in C2 and university hospitals (C5), respectively, whereas 22 % (99 % CI 10-31 %) less blood transfusions were needed at university hospitals during quiet days. In C3 hospitals, 83 % (99 % CI 65-92 %) less blood transfusions were needed during busy days. Obstetric and anal sphincter injury rates declined during quiet days by 22 % (99 % CI 3-38 %) only in university hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study identify no specific pattern to the busy day effect for adverse maternal outcomes defined as manual removal of the placenta or obstetric and anal sphincter injuries. However, both quiet and busy days seem to be associated with increased or decreased need for blood transfusions in different sized delivery units. Findings also suggest that quiet days are associated with a decreased number of obstetric and anal sphincter injuries.
BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective population-based study, utilizing the data of 601 247 singleton hospital deliveries collected from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (MBR) in 2006-2016. The aim of this study was to analyse the busy day effect on intrapartum adverse maternal outcomes. METHODS: To implement the study design, daily delivery frequencies and ranges (min-max) for each delivery unit (n = 26) were stratified to the daily delivery volume distributions by the delivery unit's annual delivery volume and profile: Category (C)1 < 1000, C2 1000-1999, C3 2000-2999, C4 ≥ 3000 and C5 the profile of university hospitals. To study the busy day effect, the quiet, optimal and busy days were defined by calculating the number of days (%) with the lowest and highest daily delivery frequencies and summed to the nearest 10 % in each hospital category. Optimal days were determined by calculating approximately 80 % of deliveries occurring between the lowest 10 %, and highest 10 % in each hospital category. Crude and adjusted odd ratios (ORs) with 99 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used to analyze the busy day effect on adverse maternal outcomes, blood transfusions, manual removal of the placenta and obstetric anal sphincter injuries, separately in each hospital category. RESULTS: The busy day effect was associated with the 28 % (99 % CI 8-52 %) and 25 % (99 % CI 11-40 %) increased need for blood transfusions in C2 and university hospitals (C5), respectively, whereas 22 % (99 % CI 10-31 %) less blood transfusions were needed at university hospitals during quiet days. In C3 hospitals, 83 % (99 % CI 65-92 %) less blood transfusions were needed during busy days. Obstetric and anal sphincter injury rates declined during quiet days by 22 % (99 % CI 3-38 %) only in university hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study identify no specific pattern to the busy day effect for adverse maternal outcomes defined as manual removal of the placenta or obstetric and anal sphincter injuries. However, both quiet and busy days seem to be associated with increased or decreased need for blood transfusions in different sized delivery units. Findings also suggest that quiet days are associated with a decreased number of obstetric and anal sphincter injuries.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adverse maternal outcome; Blood transfusion; Busy day effect; Daily delivery volume; Hospital size; Medical birth register
Authors: Kathy L Kyser; Xin Lu; Donna A Santillan; Mark K Santillan; Stephen K Hunter; Alison G Cahill; Peter Cram Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Audrey Lyndon; Henry C Lee; Caryl Gay; William M Gilbert; Jeffrey B Gould; Kathryn A Lee Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Alexander M Friedman; Cande V Ananth; Yongmei Huang; Mary E D'Alton; Jason D Wright Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jennifer L Bailit; William A Grobman; Madeline Murguia Rice; Catherine Y Spong; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Phillip J Shubert; Alan T Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter Van Dorsten Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jonathan M Snowden; Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Ifeoma Muoto; Aaron B Caughey; K John McConnell Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 7.035