Literature DB >> 33467765

Performance of the Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring (isCGM) System during a High Oral Glucose Challenge in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes-A Prospective Secondary Outcome Analysis.

Othmar Moser1,2, Norbert Tripolt1, Peter Pferschy1,3, Anna Obermayer1,3, Harald Kojzar1,3, Alexander Mueller1,4, Hakan Yildirim1, Caren Sourij1,3, Max Eckstein1,2, Harald Sourij1,5.   

Abstract

To assess intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) performance for different rates of change in plasma glucose (RCPG) during glycemic challenges in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Nineteen people with T1D (7 females; age 35 ± 11 years; HbA1c 7.3 ± 0.6% (56 ± 7 mmol/mol)) performing two glycemic challenges (OGTT) were included. During OGTTs, plasma glucose was compared against sensor glucose for timepoints 0 min (pre-OGTT), +15 min, +30 min, +60 min, +120 min, +180 min, and +240 min by means of median absolute (relative) difference (MARD and MAD) and Clarke Error Grid (CEG), then was stratified for RCPG and glycemic ranges. Overall, MARD was 8.3% (4.0-14.8) during hypoglycemia level 1 18.8% (15.8-22.0), euglycemia 9.5% (4.3-15.1), hyperglycemia level 1 9.4% (4.0-17.2), and hyperglycemia level 2 7.1% (3.3-11.9). The MARD was associated with the RCPG (p < 0.0001), detailing significant differences in comparison of low, moderate, high, and very high RCPG (p = 0.014). Overall, CEG resulted in 88% (212 values) of comparison points in zone A, 12% (29 values) in zone B, and 0.4% (1 value) in zone D. The isCGM system was accurate during OGTTs. Its performance was dependent on the RCPG and showed an overestimation of the actual reference glucose during hypoglycemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; glycemia; isCGM

Year:  2021        PMID: 33467765      PMCID: PMC7830732          DOI: 10.3390/bios11010022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-6374


  20 in total

1.  Impact of physical exercise on sensor performance of the FreeStyle Libre intermittently viewed continuous glucose monitoring system in people with Type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover trial.

Authors:  O Moser; M L Eckstein; A Mueller; P Birnbaumer; F Aberer; G Koehler; C Sourij; H Kojzar; P Holler; H Simi; P Pferschy; P Dietz; R M Bracken; P Hofmann; H Sourij
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.359

2.  Real-world flash glucose monitoring patterns and associations between self-monitoring frequency and glycaemic measures: A European analysis of over 60 million glucose tests.

Authors:  Timothy C Dunn; Yongjin Xu; Gary Hayter; Ramzi A Ajjan
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2017-12-24       Impact factor: 5.602

3.  Comparative Accuracy Analysis of a Real-time and an Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Manuela Link; Ulrike Kamecke; Delia Waldenmaier; Stefan Pleus; Arturo Garcia; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-17

4.  FreeStyle Libre and Dexcom G4 Platinum sensors: Accuracy comparisons during two weeks of home use and use during experimentally induced glucose excursions.

Authors:  F Boscari; S Galasso; A Facchinetti; M C Marescotti; V Vallone; A M L Amato; A Avogaro; D Bruttomesso
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.222

5.  The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System.

Authors:  Timothy Bailey; Bruce W Bode; Mark P Christiansen; Leslie J Klaff; Shridhara Alva
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 6.  Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range.

Authors:  Tadej Battelino; Thomas Danne; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie A Amiel; Roy Beck; Torben Biester; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce A Buckingham; William T Cefalu; Kelly L Close; Claudio Cobelli; Eyal Dassau; J Hans DeVries; Kim C Donaghue; Klemen Dovc; Francis J Doyle; Satish Garg; George Grunberger; Simon Heller; Lutz Heinemann; Irl B Hirsch; Roman Hovorka; Weiping Jia; Olga Kordonouri; Boris Kovatchev; Aaron Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Brian Levine; Alexander Mayorov; Chantal Mathieu; Helen R Murphy; Revital Nimri; Kirsten Nørgaard; Christopher G Parkin; Eric Renard; David Rodbard; Banshi Saboo; Desmond Schatz; Keaton Stoner; Tatsuiko Urakami; Stuart A Weinzimer; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Interstitial Glucose and Physical Exercise in Type 1 Diabetes: Integrative Physiology, Technology, and the Gap In-Between.

Authors:  Othmar Moser; Jane E Yardley; Richard M Bracken
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Evaluation of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System on Glycemic Control, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Fear of Hypoglycemia in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ayman A Al Hayek; Asirvatham A Robert; Mohamed A Al Dawish
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2017-12-10

9.  A head-to-head comparison of personal and professional continuous glucose monitoring systems in people with type 1 diabetes: Hypoglycaemia remains the weak spot.

Authors:  Othmar Moser; Marlene Pandis; Felix Aberer; Harald Kojzar; Daniel Hochfellner; Hesham Elsayed; Melanie Motschnig; Thomas Augustin; Philipp Kreuzer; Thomas R Pieber; Harald Sourij; Julia K Mader
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  The Accuracy and Precision of the Continuously Stored Data from Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Type 2 Diabetes Patients during Standard Meal Tolerance Test.

Authors:  Rengna Yan; Huiqin Li; Xiaocen Kong; Xiaofang Zhai; Maoyuan Chen; Yixuan Sun; Lei Ye; Xiaofei Su; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.257

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accuracy of Real Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring during Different Liquid Solution Challenges in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Trial.

Authors:  Janis R Schierbauer; Svenja Günther; Sandra Haupt; Rebecca T Zimmer; Beate E M Zunner; Paul Zimmermann; Nadine B Wachsmuth; Max L Eckstein; Felix Aberer; Harald Sourij; Othmar Moser
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Evaluation of Accuracy and Performance of isCGM Sensors during Experimentally Induced Glucose Excursions. Comment on Moser et al. Performance of the Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring (isCGM) System during a High Oral Glucose Challenge in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes-A Prospective Secondary Outcome Analysis. Biosensors 2021, 11, 22.

Authors:  Wiebke Jessen; Alexander Seibold
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.