Literature DB >> 33467666

Impact of Different Positive End-Expiratory Pressures on Lung Mechanics in the Setting of Moderately Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model.

Mascha O Fiedler1,2, Emilis Simeliunas1,3, B Luise Deutsch4, Dovile Diktanaite1,3, Alexander Harms5, Maik Brune6, Maximilian Dietrich1, Florian Uhle1, Markus A Weigand1,2, Armin Kalenka2,7,8.   

Abstract

The effects of a moderately elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on lung mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have still not been fully analyzed. Moreover, the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in elevated IAP and ARDS is unclear. In this paper, 18 pigs under general anesthesia received a double hit lung injury. After saline lung lavage and 2 h of injurious mechanical ventilation to induce an acute lung injury (ALI), an intra-abdominal balloon was filled until an IAP of 10 mmHg was generated. Animals were randomly assigned to one of three groups (group A = PEEP 5, B = PEEP 10 and C = PEEP 15 cmH2O) and ventilated for 6 h. We measured end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) per kg bodyweight, driving pressure (ΔP), transpulmonary pressure (ΔPL), static lung compliance (Cstat), oxygenation (P/F ratio) and cardiac index (CI). In group A, we found increases in ΔP (22 ± 1 vs. 28 ± 2 cmH2O; p = 0.006) and ΔPL (16 ± 1 vs. 22 ± 2 cmH2O; p = 0.007), with no change in EELV/kg (15 ± 1 vs. 14 ± 1 mL/kg) when comparing hours 0 and 6. In group B, there was no change in ΔP (26 ± 2 vs. 25 ± 2 cmH2O), ΔPL (19 ± 2 vs. 18 ± 2 cmH2O), Cstat (21 ± 3 vs. 21 ± 2 cmH2O/mL) or EELV/kg (12 ± 2 vs. 13 ± 3 mL/kg). ΔP and ΔPL were significantly lower after 6 h when comparing between group C and A (21 ± 1 vs. 28 ± 2 cmH2O; p = 0.020) and (14 ± 1 vs. 22 ± 2 cmH2O; p = 0.013)). The EELV/kg increased over time in group C (13 ± 1 vs. 19 ± 2 mL/kg; p = 0.034). The P/F ratio increased in all groups over time. CI decreased in groups B and C. The global lung injury score did not significantly differ between groups (A: 0.25 ± 0.05, B: 0.21 ± 0.02, C: 0.22 ± 0.03). In this model of ALI, elevated IAP, ΔP and ΔPL increased further over time in the group with a PEEP of 5 cmH2O applied over 6 h. This was not the case in the groups with a PEEP of 10 and 15 cmH2O. Although ΔP and ΔPL were significantly lower after 6 hours in group C compared to group A, we could not show significant differences in histological lung injury score.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALI; ARDS; PEEP; end-expiratory lung volume; intraabdominal pressure; transpulmonary pressure

Year:  2021        PMID: 33467666      PMCID: PMC7830768          DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  36 in total

1.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

Review 2.  Ventilator-induced lung injury.

Authors:  Arthur S Slutsky; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Early impact of abdominal compartment syndrome on liver, kidney and lung damage in a rodent model.

Authors:  Ricardo Lima; Pedro L Silva; Vera L Capelozzi; Mariana G Oliveira; Maria Cristina E Santana; Fernanda F Cruz; Paolo Pelosi; Alberto Schanaider; Manu L N G Malbrain; Patricia R M Rocco
Journal:  Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther       Date:  2017-05-14

4.  In vivo lung lavage as an experimental model of the respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  B Lachmann; B Robertson; J Vogel
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.105

5.  A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique.

Authors:  A Baydur; P K Behrakis; W A Zin; M Jaeger; J Milic-Emili
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1982-11

6.  Alveolar instability (atelectrauma) is not identified by arterial oxygenation predisposing the development of an occult ventilator-induced lung injury.

Authors:  Penny L Andrews; Benjamin Sadowitz; Michaela Kollisch-Singule; Joshua Satalin; Shreyas Roy; Kathy Snyder; Louis A Gatto; Gary F Nieman; Nader M Habashi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2015-06-09

Review 7.  Ventilation in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension: what every critical care physician needs to know.

Authors:  Adrian Regli; Paolo Pelosi; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 6.925

8.  Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory function and hemodynamics in patients with acute respiratory failure with and without intra-abdominal hypertension: a pilot study.

Authors:  Joerg Krebs; Paolo Pelosi; Charalambos Tsagogiorgas; Markus Alb; Thomas Luecke
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Mechanical ventilation and intra-abdominal hypertension: 'Beyond Good and Evil'.

Authors:  Paolo Pelosi; Maria Vargas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Effect of moderate elevated intra-abdominal pressure on lung mechanics and histological lung injury at different positive end-expiratory pressures.

Authors:  Mascha O Fiedler; B Luise Deutsch; Emilis Simeliunas; Dovile Diktanaite; Alexander Harms; Maik Brune; Florian Uhle; Markus Weigand; Thorsten Brenner; Armin Kalenka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Tidal volume significantly affects oxygenation in healthy pigs during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared to conventional ventilation.

Authors:  Karel Roubík; Jakub Ráfl; Martin Rožánek; Petr Kudrna; Mikuláš Mlček
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.