Literature DB >> 7149443

A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique.

A Baydur, P K Behrakis, W A Zin, M Jaeger, J Milic-Emili.   

Abstract

The validity of the conventional esophageal balloon technique as a measure of pleural pressure was tested in 10 subjects in sitting, supine, and lateral positions by occluding the airways at end-expiration and measuring the ratio of changes in esophageal (delta Pes) and mouth pressure (delta Pm) during the ensuing spontaneous occluded inspiratory efforts. Similar measurements were also made during static Mueller maneuvers. In both tests, delta Pes/delta Pm values were close to unity in sitting and lateral positions, whereas in the supine position, substantial deviations from unity were found in some instances. However, by repositioning the balloon to different levels in the esophagus, even in these instances a locus could be found where the delta Pes/delta Pm ratio was close to unity. No appreciable phase difference between delta Pes and delta Pm was found. We conclude that by positioning the balloon according to the "occlusion test" procedure, valid measurements of pleural pressure can be obtained in all the tested body positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7149443     DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1982.126.5.788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  213 in total

1.  Changes in ventilatory mechanics and diaphragmatic function after lung volume reduction surgery in patients with COPD.

Authors:  E M Tschernko; W Wisser; T Wanke; M A Rajek; M Kritzinger; H Lahrmann; M Kontrus; H Benditte; W Klepetko
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on upper airway inspiratory dynamics in awake patients with sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  E Vérin; T Similowski; F Sériès
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Demonstration of a second rapidly conducting cortico-diaphragmatic pathway in humans.

Authors:  Tarek Sharshar; Nicholas S Hopkinson; Sophie Jonville; Hélène Prigent; Robert Carlier; Mark J Dayer; Elisabeth B Swallow; Frédéric Lofaso; John Moxham; Michael I Polkey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Diaphragm ultrasonography to estimate the work of breathing during non-invasive ventilation.

Authors:  Emmanuel Vivier; Armand Mekontso Dessap; Saoussen Dimassi; Frederic Vargas; Aissam Lyazidi; Arnaud W Thille; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Measuring the breathing workload in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  G Annat; J P Viale
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Influence of ventilator settings on patient-ventilator synchrony during pressure support ventilation with different interfaces.

Authors:  R Costa; P Navalesi; G Spinazzola; G Ferrone; A Pellegrini; F Cavaliere; R Proietti; M Antonelli; G Conti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Maintaining end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure prevents worsening of ventilator-induced lung injury caused by chest wall constriction in surfactant-depleted rats.

Authors:  Stephen H Loring; Matteo Pecchiari; Patrizia Della Valle; Ario Monaco; Guendalina Gentile; Edgardo D'Angelo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Variations in pulmonary artery occlusion pressure to estimate changes in pleural pressure.

Authors:  Patrick Bellemare; Peter Goldberg; Sheldon A Magder
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  P0.1 is a useful parameter in setting the level of pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  A Alberti; F Gallo; A Fongaro; S Valenti; A Rossi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Re-engineering ventilatory support to decrease days and improve resource utilization.

Authors:  O C Kirton; C B DeHaven; J Hudson-Civetta; J P Morgan; J Windsor; J M Civetta
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.