Literature DB >> 33466868

High Integrity and Fidelity of Long-Term Cryopreserved Umbilical Cord Blood for Transplantation.

Gee-Hye Kim1, Jihye Kwak1, Sung Hee Kim2, Hee Jung Kim2, Hye Kyung Hong2, Hye Jin Jin1, Soo Jin Choi1, Wonil Oh1,2, Soyoun Um1.   

Abstract

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is used as a source of donor cells for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. The success of transplantation is dependent on the quality of cord blood (CB) units for maximizing the chance of engraftment. Improved outcomes following transplantation are associated with certain factors of cryopreserved CB units: total volume and total nucleated cell (TNC) count, mononuclear cell (MNC) count, and CD34+ cell count. The role of the storage period of CB units in determining the viability and counts of cells is less clear and is related to the quality of cryopreserved CB units. Herein, we demonstrate the recovery of viable TNCs and CD34+ cells, as well as the MNC viability in 20-year-old cryopreserved CB units in a CB bank (MEDIPOST Co., Ltd., Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea). In addition, cell populations in CB units were evaluated for future clinical applications. The stable recovery rate of the viability of cryopreserved CB that had been stored for up to 20 years suggested the possibility of uses of the long-term cryopreservation of CB units. Similar relationships were observed in the recovery of TNCs and CD34+ cells in units of cryopreserved and fresh CB. The high-viability recovery of long-term cryopreserved CB suggests that successful hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation and other clinical applications, which are suitable for treating incurable diseases, may be performed regardless of long-term storage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cord blood; long-term cryopreservation; recovery; total nucleated cells

Year:  2021        PMID: 33466868      PMCID: PMC7830419          DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Med        ISSN: 2077-0383            Impact factor:   4.241


  34 in total

1.  Cell dose and speed of engraftment in placental/umbilical cord blood transplantation: graft progenitor cell content is a better predictor than nucleated cell quantity.

Authors:  A R Migliaccio; J W Adamson; C E Stevens; N L Dobrila; C M Carrier; P Rubinstein
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Surface-immobilization of adhesion peptides on substrate for ex vivo expansion of cryopreserved umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells.

Authors:  Xue-Song Jiang; Chou Chai; Yue Zhang; Ren-Xi Zhuo; Hai-Quan Mao; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, generation of induced pluripotent stem cells, and isolation of endothelial progenitors from 21- to 23.5-year cryopreserved cord blood.

Authors:  Hal E Broxmeyer; Man-Ryul Lee; Giao Hangoc; Scott Cooper; Nutan Prasain; Young-June Kim; Coleen Mallett; Zhaohui Ye; Scott Witting; Kenneth Cornetta; Linzhao Cheng; Mervin C Yoder
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Cord blood research, banking, and transplantation: achievements, challenges, and perspectives.

Authors:  Hector Mayani; John E Wagner; Hal E Broxmeyer
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 5.  Umbilical cord blood banking: an update.

Authors:  Merlin G Butler; Jay E Menitove
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Umbilical Cord Blood Banking and Transplantation: A short review.

Authors:  Salam Alkindi; David Dennison
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-10-25

7.  Quality rather than quantity: the cord blood bank dilemma.

Authors:  S Querol; S G Gomez; A Pagliuca; M Torrabadella; J A Madrigal
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  Lack of impact of umbilical cord blood unit processing techniques on clinical outcomes in adult double cord blood transplant recipients.

Authors:  Sarah Nikiforow; Shuli Li; Karen Snow; Deborah Liney; Grace Shih-Hui Kao; Richard Haspel; Elizabeth J Shpall; Brett Glotzbecker; R Alejandro Sica; Philippe Armand; John Koreth; Vincent T Ho; Edwin P Alyea; Jerome Ritz; Robert J Soiffer; Joseph H Antin; Bimal Dey; Steven McAfee; Yi-Bin Chen; Thomas Spitzer; David Avigan; Corey S Cutler; Karen Ballen
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.414

9.  Autologous umbilical cord blood transfusion in young children with type 1 diabetes fails to preserve C-peptide.

Authors:  Michael J Haller; Clive H Wasserfall; Maigan A Hulme; Miriam Cintron; Todd M Brusko; Kieran M McGrail; Theresa M Sumrall; John R Wingard; Douglas W Theriaque; Jonathan J Shuster; Mark A Atkinson; Desmond A Schatz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  A review of factors influencing the banking of collected umbilical cord blood units.

Authors:  David Allan; Tanya Petraszko; Heidi Elmoazzen; Susan Smith
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 5.443

View more
  2 in total

1.  Banking of AT-MSC and its Influence on Their Application to Clinical Procedures.

Authors:  Ekaterina Semenova; Mariusz P Grudniak; Katarzyna Bocian; Magdalena Chroscinska-Krawczyk; Marzena Trochonowicz; Igor M Stepaniec; Magdalena Murzyn; Ilona Szablowska-Gadomska; Dariusz Boruczkowski; Tomasz Oldak; Eugeniusz K Machaj
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-30

2.  Long-Term Cryopreservation Does Not Affect Quality of Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Grafts: A Comparative Study of Native, Short-Term and Long-Term Cryopreserved Haematopoietic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Daniel Lysak; Michaela Brychtová; Martin Leba; Miroslava Čedíková; Daniel Georgiev; Pavel Jindra; Tomáš Vlas; Monika Holubova
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.