Literature DB >> 33466736

3D-Printed Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Modified with Alkaline Hydrolysis Enhance Osteogenesis In Vitro.

Sangbae Park1, Jae Eun Kim2, Jinsub Han2,3, Seung Jeong1, Jae Woon Lim1, Myung Chul Lee1, Hyunmok Son1, Hong Bae Kim1, Yun-Hoon Choung4, Hoon Seonwoo5,6, Jong Hoon Chung2,3,7, Kyoung-Je Jang8,9.   

Abstract

The 3D-printed bioactive ceramic incorporated Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds show great promise as synthetic bone graft substitutes. However, 3D-printed scaffolds still lack adequate surface properties for cells to be attached to them. In this study, we modified the surface characteristics of 3D-printed poly(ε-caprolactone)/hydroxyapatite scaffolds using O2 plasma and sodium hydroxide. The surface property of the alkaline hydrolyzed and O2 plasma-treated PCL/HA scaffolds were evaluated using field-emission scanning microscopy (FE-SEM), Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining, and water contact angle analysis, respectively. The in vitro behavior of the scaffolds was investigated using human dental pulp-derived stem cells (hDPSCs). Cell proliferation of hDPSCs on the scaffolds was evaluated via immunocytochemistry (ICC) and water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1) assay. Osteogenic differentiation of hDPSCs on the scaffolds was further investigated using ARS staining and Western blot analysis. The result of this study shows that alkaline treatment is beneficial for exposing hydroxyapatite particles embedded in the scaffolds compared to O2 plasma treatment, which promotes cell proliferation and differentiation of hDPSCs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; 3D scaffold; alkaline hydrolysis; hydroxyapatite; oxygen plasma; surface modification

Year:  2021        PMID: 33466736      PMCID: PMC7830212          DOI: 10.3390/polym13020257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Polymers (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4360            Impact factor:   4.329


  28 in total

1.  Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment.

Authors:  Kyung Mi Woo; Victor J Chen; Peter X Ma
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 2.  Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: A review.

Authors:  Xiaojian Wang; Shanqing Xu; Shiwei Zhou; Wei Xu; Martin Leary; Peter Choong; M Qian; Milan Brandt; Yi Min Xie
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  What should be the characteristics of the ideal bone graft substitute?

Authors:  P V Giannoudis; J J Chris Arts; G Schmidmaier; S Larsson
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  What should be the characteristics of the ideal bone graft substitute? Combining scaffolds with growth factors and/or stem cells.

Authors:  Patricia Janicki; Gerhard Schmidmaier
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 5.  Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size.

Authors:  Qiu Li Loh; Cleo Choong
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 6.  3D Bioprinting for Cartilage and Osteochondral Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Andrew C Daly; Fiona E Freeman; Tomas Gonzalez-Fernandez; Susan E Critchley; Jessica Nulty; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 7.  Role and regulation of RUNX2 in osteogenesis.

Authors:  M Bruderer; R G Richards; M Alini; M J Stoddart
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.942

8.  In-vitro cell adhesion and proliferation of adipose derived stem cell on hydroxyapatite composite surfaces.

Authors:  Praneetha Pulyala; Akshay Singh; Marcela Ferreira Dias-Netipanyj; Sheron Compos Cogo; Luciane S Santos; Paulo Soares; Vasanth Gopal; V Suganthan; Geetha Manivasagam; Ketul C Popat
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 9.  A review: fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds.

Authors:  H Janik; M Marzec
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 7.328

10.  Development of an electrospun nano-apatite/PCL composite membrane for GTR/GBR application.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Sanne K Both; Xuechao Yang; X Frank Walboomers; John A Jansen
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  2 in total

1.  3D Printed Poly(𝜀-caprolactone)/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study on a Composite Preparation by Melt Blending or Solvent Casting Techniques and the Influence of Bioceramic Content on Scaffold Properties.

Authors:  Sara Biscaia; Mariana V Branquinho; Rui D Alvites; Rita Fonseca; Ana Catarina Sousa; Sílvia Santos Pedrosa; Ana R Caseiro; Fernando Guedes; Tatiana Patrício; Tânia Viana; Artur Mateus; Ana C Maurício; Nuno Alves
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Enhanced osteogenic differentiation of stem cells by 3D printed PCL scaffolds coated with collagen and hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Zahra Ebrahimi; Shiva Irani; Abdolreza Ardeshirylajimi; Ehsan Seyedjafari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.