Literature DB >> 33466368

Histological and Histomorphometric Analyses of Bone Regeneration in Osteoporotic Rats Using a Xenograft Material.

Marwa Y Shaheen1, Amani M Basudan1, Abdurahman A Niazy2, Jeroen J J P van den Beucken3, John A Jansen3, Hamdan S Alghamdi1.   

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of osteoporotic induction after eight weeks of initial healing of bone defects grafted with a xenograft material in a rat model. Bone defects were created in the femoral condyles of 16 female Wistar rats (one defect per rat). The defects were filled with bovine bone (Inter-Oss) granules. After eight weeks of bone healing, rats were randomly ovariectomized (OVX) or sham-operated (SHAM). At 14 weeks of bone healing, all animals were euthanized. Bone specimens were harvested and processed for histological and histomorphometric analyses to assess new bone formation (N-BF%), remaining bone graft (RBG%) and trabecular bone space (Tb.Sp%) within the defect area. After 14 weeks of bone healing, histological evaluation revealed a significant alteration in trabecular bone in OVX rats compared to SHAM rats. There was lower N-BF% in OVX rats (22.5% ± 3.0%) compared to SHAM rats (37.7% ± 7.9%; p < 0.05). Additionally, the RBG% was significantly lower in OVX (23.7% ± 5.8%) compared to SHAM (34.8% ± 9.6%; p < 0.05) rats. Finally, the Tb.Sp% was higher in OVX (53.8% ± 7.7%) compared to SHAM (27.5% ± 14.3%; p < 0.05) rats. In conclusion, within the limitations of this study, inducing an osteoporotic condition in a rat model negatively influenced bone regeneration in the created bone defect and grafted with a xenograft material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal model; bone regeneration; osteoporotic condition; xenograft

Year:  2021        PMID: 33466368      PMCID: PMC7795077          DOI: 10.3390/ma14010222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  46 in total

Review 1.  Bone and bone substitutes.

Authors:  H F Nasr; M E Aichelmann-Reidy; R A Yukna
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.589

2.  Impaired bone healing pattern in mice with ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis: A drill-hole defect model.

Authors:  Yi-Xin He; Ge Zhang; Xiao-Hua Pan; Zhong Liu; Li-Zhen Zheng; Chun-Wai Chan; Kwong-Man Lee; Yong-Ping Cao; Gang Li; Lei Wei; Leung-Kim Hung; Kwok-Sui Leung; Ling Qin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Estrogen and the skeleton.

Authors:  Sundeep Khosla; Merry Jo Oursler; David G Monroe
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 12.015

4.  Osteoporotic rat models for evaluation of osseointegration of bone implants.

Authors:  Hamdan S Alghamdi; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; John A Jansen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.056

5.  Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans.

Authors:  M Piattelli; G A Favero; A Scarano; G Orsini; A Piattelli
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  The association between osteoporosis and oral bone loss.

Authors:  Marjorie Jeffcoat
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Animal models of osteoporosis--necessity and limitations.

Authors:  A S Turner
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 3.942

8.  FDA Guidelines and animal models for osteoporosis.

Authors:  D D Thompson; H A Simmons; C M Pirie; H Z Ke
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions.

Authors:  Ahmad Oryan; Soodeh Alidadi; Ali Moshiri; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 10.  Cellular Mechanisms Responsible for Success and Failure of Bone Substitute Materials.

Authors:  Tim Rolvien; Mike Barbeck; Sabine Wenisch; Michael Amling; Matthias Krause
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-09-23       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Two Bovine Commercial Xenografts in the Regeneration of Critical Cranial Defects.

Authors:  Carlos Humberto Valencia-Llano; Diego López-Tenorio; Marcela Saavedra; Paula A Zapata; Carlos David Grande-Tovar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Bone Regeneration Using PEVAV/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Composite Scaffolds in Standardized Calvarial Defects: Micro-Computed Tomographic Experiment in Rats.

Authors:  Mohammed Badwelan; Mohammed Alkindi; Osama Alghamdi; Abeer Ahmed; Sundar Ramalingam; Ali Alrahlah
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.