Literature DB >> 33465458

Outcomes associated with recent guideline recommendations removing metronidazole for treatment of non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection: a retrospective, observational, nationwide cohort study.

Chris A Gentry1, Darien L Campbell2, Riley J Williams2.   

Abstract

The 2017 Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) removed metronidazole as a preferred option for initial episodes of non-severe CDI. The objective of this study is to determine if the shift away from metronidazole improve clinical outcomes of initial episodes of non-severe CDI. The study was a retrospective, observational, nationwide cohort study using a Veterans Health Administration national clinical administrative database. Adult patients treated for non-severe CDI pre- and post- the February 2018 publication of the 2017 IDSA/SHEA C. difficile Clinical Practice Guidelines were included. The primary outcome was the composite of treatment failure or probable recurrence. A total of 3,608 patients were included, with 1,809 in pre-guideline cohort (mean [SD] age, 65.5 [14.2] years; 1,602[88.6%] male) and 1799 in post-guideline cohort (mean [SD] age, 64[14.6] years; 1584[88%] male). Overall composite of treatment failure or probable recurrence was similar between both cohorts (318 of 1,809 [17.6%] pre-guideline cohort vs 317 of 1,799 [17.6%] post-guideline cohort [P=0.97]). The shift away from metronidazole as a preferred option in initial non-severe CDI did not improve the composite of treatment failure or recurrence.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridioides difficile infection; Metronidazole; Vancomycin

Year:  2021        PMID: 33465458     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  4 in total

1.  Impact of the Introduction of a Two-Step Laboratory Diagnostic Algorithm in the Incidence and Earlier Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Authors:  Nieves Sopena; Jun Hao Wang-Wang; Irma Casas; Lourdes Mateu; Laia Castellà; María José García-Quesada; Sara Gutierrez; Josep M Llibre; M Luisa Pedro-Botet; Gema Fernandez-Rivas
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  Non-inferiority of metronidazole to vancomycin in the treatment of first episode non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection: a single center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ronza Najjar-Debbiny; Alina Bazazhina; Naama Schwartz; Pninit Shaked; Walid Saliba; Gabriel Weber
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 7.455

3.  Impact of Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Outpatient Treatment for Clostridioides difficile Infection and Associated Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Justin T Puckett; Engels N Obi; Sachin Kamal-Bahl; Kaushal Desai; Bruce Stuart; Jalpa A Doshi
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.423

4.  Changes in treatment of community-onset Clostridioides difficile infection after release of updated guidelines, Atlanta, Georgia, 2018.

Authors:  Max W Adelman; Dana Goodenough; Samantha Sefton; Carolyn Mackey; Stepy Thomas; Scott K Fridkin; Michael H Woodworth
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.837

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.