Literature DB >> 33462974

Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis: Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation.

Katrien M J Devreese1,2, Philip G de Groot3, Bas de Laat3, Doruk Erkan4, Emmanuel J Favaloro5, Ian Mackie6, Marta Martinuzzo7, Thomas L Ortel8,9, Vittorio Pengo10, Jacob H Rand11, Armando Tripodi12,13, Denis Wahl14,15, Hannah Cohen16,17.   

Abstract

This guidance focuses on methodological aspects of lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing, as well as interpretation of results for clinicians. The main changes in how to test for LA compared with the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee 2009 guidelines, in the preanalytical phase are more detailed recommendations on how to handle testing in anticoagulated patients, and the timing of testing. Also, routine coagulation tests are advised to obtain more information on the coagulation background of the patient, and when necessary, anti-Xa activity measurement for heparins or specific assays for direct oral anticoagulants should be performed. The three-step procedure with two test systems (diluted Russell's viper venom time and activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]) is essentially not changed. Silica remains the preferable activator in the aPTT assays, but ellagic acid is not excluded. We advise simultaneous performance of the mixing and confirmatory step, in each sample with a prolonged screening test. The confirmatory step can also be performed on a mixture of patient plasma and normal pooled plasma. Cutoff values should be established in-house on at least 120 normals, with transference of the manufacturer's cutoffs as an alternative. Reporting of results has not been changed, although more attention is focused on what clinicians should know. Patient selection for LA testing has been expanded.
© 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antiphospholipid syndrome; confirmatory testing; cut‐off values; guidance; laboratory diagnosis; lupus anticoagulant; pre‐analytical

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33462974     DOI: 10.1111/jth.15047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  31 in total

1.  Antiphospholipid Antibodies and the Antiphospholipid Syndrome: From Coagulation to the Clinic.

Authors:  Rita Selby; Jameel Abdulrehman
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2022-01-05

2.  Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) interference in hemostasis assays.

Authors:  Karen A Moser; Kristi J Smock
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  Neuroimaging features of antiphospholipid antibody-related stroke compared with atrial fibrillation-related stroke.

Authors:  Wookjin Yang; Dong-Wan Kang; Jeong-Min Kim; Keun-Hwa Jung; Seung-Hoon Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances.

Authors:  Arne Vandevelde; Katrien M J Devreese
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Acquired haemophilia A: Italian Consensus Recommendations on diagnosis, general management and treatment of bleeding.

Authors:  Antonio Coppola; Massimo Franchini; Armando Tripodi; Rita C Santoro; Giancarlo Castaman; Renato Marino; Ezio Zanon; Cristina Santoro; Gianna F Rivolta; Laura Contino; Raimondo De Cristofaro; Angelo C Molinari; Paolo Gresele; Angiola Rocino
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.752

6.  Incidence of lupus anticoagulant in hospitalized covid-19 patients.

Authors:  Tarek Owaidah; Mahasen Saleh; Amelita M Aguilos; Abdulllah Al Amri; Khalid Maghrabi; Mustafa Owaidah; Khawar Siddiqui; Khalid Alsaleh; Randa Alnounou
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2021-06-15

7.  Lupus Anticoagulant Single Positivity During the Acute Phase of COVID-19 Is Not Associated With Venous Thromboembolism or In-Hospital Mortality.

Authors:  Nicolas Gendron; Marie-Agnès Dragon-Durey; Richard Chocron; Luc Darnige; Georges Jourdi; Aurélien Philippe; Camille Chenevier-Gobeaux; Jérôme Hadjadj; Jérôme Duchemin; Lina Khider; Nader Yatim; Guillaume Goudot; Daphné Krzisch; Benjamin Debuc; Laetitia Mauge; Françoise Levavasseur; Frédéric Pene; Jeremy Boussier; Elise Sourdeau; Julie Brichet; Nadège Ochat; Claire Goulvestre; Christophe Peronino; Tali-Anne Szwebel; Franck Pages; Pascale Gaussem; Charles-Marc Samama; Cherifa Cheurfa; Benjamin Planquette; Olivier Sanchez; Jean-Luc Diehl; Tristan Mirault; Michaela Fontenay; Benjamin Terrier; David M Smadja
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 15.483

Review 8.  Antiphospholipid Syndrome Alliance for Clinical Trials and International Networking (APS ACTION): 10-Year Update.

Authors:  Doruk Erkan; Savino Sciascia; Maria Laura Bertolaccini; Hannah Cohen
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Systematic Review of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in COVID-19 Patients: Culprits or Bystanders?

Authors:  Thomas Foret; Virginie Dufrost; Lucie Salomon Du Mont; Patricia Costa; Benjamin Lefevre; Patrick Lacolley; Veronique Regnault; Stephane Zuily; Denis Wahl
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Lupus anticoagulant and mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Authors:  Carmine Gazzaruso; Giuseppe Mariani; Carolina Ravetto; Laura Malinverni; Elena Tondelli; Maria Cerrone; Vittorio Sala; Luigi Bevilacqua; Teodoro Altavilla; Adriana Coppola; Pietro Gallotti
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.