Literature DB >> 33462316

GATA3 somatic mutations are associated with clinicopathological features and expression profile in TCGA breast cancer patients.

Fahimeh Afzaljavan1, Ayeh Sadat Sadr2, Sevtap Savas3,4, Alireza Pasdar5,6,7.   

Abstract

The effect of somatic mutations and the gene expression profiles on the prognosis is well documented in cancer research. This study was conducted to evaluate the association of GATA3 somatic mutations with tumor features, survival, and expression profiles in breast cancer. Clinicopathological information was compared between TCGA-BRCA patients with GATA3-mutant and non-mutant tumors in all patients as well as in ER-positive subgroup. Cox-regression method was used to evaluate the association of the GATA3 mutation status with overall survival time. Differential gene expression, functional annotation, and protein-protein interaction analyses were performed using edgeR, Metascape, DAVID, STRING and CytoNCA. GATA3-mutant and non-mutant samples had significantly different clinicopathological features (p < 0.05). While GATA3 mutation status was not associated with the overall survival in the entire cohort (padj = 0.52), the GATA3-wild type ER-positive cases had a better prognosis than mutant ones (padj = 0.04). GATA3 expression was higher in tumors than normal tissues. Several pathways were different between mutant and non-mutant groups (p < 0.05). Interleukin-6 was found as the highest scored gene in both comparisons (normal vs. mutant and normal vs. non-mutant groups) in the entire patient and in the ER-positive subgroup, suggesting the association of IL6 with breast tumorigenesis. These findings suggest that GATA3 mutations can be associated with several tumor characteristics and influence the pattern of gene expression. However, GATA3 mutation status seems to be a prognostic factor for the disease only in ER-positive patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33462316     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80680-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  54 in total

1.  GATA3 expression and its relationship with clinicopathological parameters in invasive breast carcinomas.

Authors:  A Cakir; I Isik Gonul; O Ekinci; B Cetin; M Benekli; O Uluoglu
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 2.  GATA3 in Breast Cancer: Tumor Suppressor or Oncogene?

Authors:  Motoki Takaku; Sara A Grimm; Paul A Wade
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2015

3.  Mutation of GATA3 in human breast tumors.

Authors:  Jerry Usary; Victor Llaca; Gamze Karaca; Shafaq Presswala; Mehmet Karaca; Xiaping He; Anita Langerød; Rolf Kåresen; Daniel S Oh; Lynn G Dressler; Per E Lønning; Robert L Strausberg; Stephen Chanock; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  GATA3: a multispecific but potentially useful marker in surgical pathology: a systematic analysis of 2500 epithelial and nonepithelial tumors.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Peter A McCue; Maarit Sarlomo-Rikala; Janusz Rys; Piotr Czapiewski; Krzysztof Wazny; Renata Langfort; Piotr Waloszczyk; Wojciech Biernat; Jerzy Lasota; Zengfeng Wang
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 5.  Somatic mutations in breast and serous ovarian cancer young patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giselly Encinas; Simone Maistro; Fátima Solange Pasini; Maria Lucia Hirata Katayama; Maria Mitzi Brentani; Geertruida Hendrika de Bock; Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.209

Review 6.  GATA3 in development and cancer differentiation: cells GATA have it!

Authors:  Jonathan Chou; Sylvain Provot; Zena Werb
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Gene-environment interaction and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Anja Rudolph; Jenny Chang-Claude; Marjanka K Schmidt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Erratum: The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refine their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes.

Authors:  Bernard Pereira; Suet-Feung Chin; Oscar M Rueda; Hans-Kristian Moen Vollan; Elena Provenzano; Helen A Bardwell; Michelle Pugh; Linda Jones; Roslin Russell; Stephen-John Sammut; Dana W Y Tsui; Bin Liu; Sarah-Jane Dawson; Jean Abraham; Helen Northen; John F Peden; Abhik Mukherjee; Gulisa Turashvili; Andrew R Green; Steve McKinney; Arusha Oloumi; Sohrab Shah; Nitzan Rosenfeld; Leigh Murphy; David R Bentley; Ian O Ellis; Arnie Purushotham; Sarah E Pinder; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Helena M Earl; Paul D Pharoah; Mark T Ross; Samuel Aparicio; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences.

Authors:  Serena Nik-Zainal; Helen Davies; Johan Staaf; Manasa Ramakrishna; Dominik Glodzik; Xueqing Zou; Inigo Martincorena; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Sancha Martin; David C Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Young Seok Ju; Marcel Smid; Arie B Brinkman; Sandro Morganella; Miriam R Aure; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Anita Langerød; Markus Ringnér; Sung-Min Ahn; Sandrine Boyault; Jane E Brock; Annegien Broeks; Adam Butler; Christine Desmedt; Luc Dirix; Serge Dronov; Aquila Fatima; John A Foekens; Moritz Gerstung; Gerrit K J Hooijer; Se Jin Jang; David R Jones; Hyung-Yong Kim; Tari A King; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Hee Jin Lee; Jeong-Yeon Lee; Yilong Li; Stuart McLaren; Andrew Menzies; Ville Mustonen; Sarah O'Meara; Iris Pauporté; Xavier Pivot; Colin A Purdie; Keiran Raine; Kamna Ramakrishnan; F Germán Rodríguez-González; Gilles Romieu; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Peter T Simpson; Rebecca Shepherd; Lucy Stebbings; Olafur A Stefansson; Jon Teague; Stefania Tommasi; Isabelle Treilleux; Gert G Van den Eynden; Peter Vermeulen; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Lucy Yates; Carlos Caldas; Laura van't Veer; Andrew Tutt; Stian Knappskog; Benita Kiat Tee Tan; Jos Jonkers; Åke Borg; Naoto T Ueno; Christos Sotiriou; Alain Viari; P Andrew Futreal; Peter J Campbell; Paul N Span; Steven Van Laere; Sunil R Lakhani; Jorunn E Eyfjord; Alastair M Thompson; Ewan Birney; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Marc J van de Vijver; John W M Martens; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Andrea L Richardson; Gu Kong; Gilles Thomas; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

1.  Upregulated GATA3/miR205-5p Axis Inhibits MFNG Transcription and Reduces the Malignancy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Samson Mugisha; Xiaotang Di; Doudou Wen; Yuetao Zhao; Xusheng Wu; Shubing Zhang; Hao Jiang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  The breast pre-cancer atlas illustrates the molecular and micro-environmental diversity of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Daniela Nachmanson; Adam Officer; Hidetoshi Mori; Jonathan Gordon; Mark F Evans; Joseph Steward; Huazhen Yao; Thomas O'Keefe; Farnaz Hasteh; Gary S Stein; Kristen Jepsen; Donald L Weaver; Gillian L Hirst; Brian L Sprague; Laura J Esserman; Alexander D Borowsky; Janet L Stein; Olivier Harismendy
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-01-13

3.  HAUS5 Is A Potential Prognostic Biomarker With Functional Significance in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zhijian Huang; Jiasheng Yang; Wenjing Qiu; Jing Huang; Zhirong Chen; Yuanyuan Han; Changsheng Ye
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Positive Regulation of Estrogen Receptor Alpha in Breast Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Lucas Porras; Houssam Ismail; Sylvie Mader
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Epigenetic Mechanisms Influencing Therapeutic Response in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Amaia Arruabarrena-Aristorena; Eneda Toska
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Omics Analysis of Chemoresistant Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells Reveals Novel Metabolic Vulnerabilities.

Authors:  Dimitris Kordias; Christina E Kostara; Styliani Papadaki; John Verigos; Eleni Bairaktari; Angeliki Magklara
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 7.  Vitamin D May Protect against Breast Cancer through the Regulation of Long Noncoding RNAs by VDR Signaling.

Authors:  Janusz Blasiak; Jan Chojnacki; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Aleksandra Jablkowska; Cezary Chojnacki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.